CVE-2025-10158 (GCVE-0-2025-10158)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-18 14:24 – Updated: 2025-11-19 16:48
VLAI?
Title
Rsync: Out of bounds array access via negative index
Summary
A malicious client acting as the receiver of an rsync file transfer can trigger an out of bounds read of a heap based buffer, via a negative array index. The malicious rsync client requires at least read access to the remote rsync module in order to trigger the issue.
Severity ?
4.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CWE
  • CWE-129 - Improper Validation of Array Index
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
rsync rsync Affected: 0 , ≤ 3.4.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public ?
2025-11-18 14:20
Credits
Calum Hutton
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-10158",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-11-19T16:15:02.998218Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-11-19T16:48:56.591Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "rsync",
          "vendor": "rsync",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "3.4.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Calum Hutton"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-11-18T14:20:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "A malicious client acting as the receiver of an rsync file transfer can trigger an out of bounds read of a heap based buffer, via a negative array index. The \n\nmalicious \n\nrsync client requires at least read access to the remote rsync module in order to trigger the issue."
            }
          ],
          "value": "A malicious client acting as the receiver of an rsync file transfer can trigger an out of bounds read of a heap based buffer, via a negative array index. The \n\nmalicious \n\nrsync client requires at least read access to the remote rsync module in order to trigger the issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-129",
              "description": "CWE-129 Improper Validation of Array Index",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-11-18T14:45:58.065Z",
        "orgId": "9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7",
        "shortName": "rapid7"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/commit/797e17fc4a6f15e3b1756538a9f812b63942686f"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://attackerkb.com/assessments/fbacb2a6-d1cd-4011-bb3a-f06b1c8306b1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-03-19T06:11:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 makes initial outreach to rsync maintainers"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-03-19T10:04:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rsync maintainers confirm outreach"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-03-20T10:34:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 provides rsync maintainers a technical writeup and PoC to reproduce the issue"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-04-02T03:05:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 requests confirmation of findings"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-04-06T09:30:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rsync maintainers indicate more time is needed"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-04-16T05:31:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rsync maintainers reproduce the issue and dispute its security impact due to uncertainty around viability of heap manipulation during exploitation"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-04-17T01:56:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 indicates manipulating the heap is nuanced and CVE assignment is both prudent and best practice in this instance"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-05-07T09:08:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 requests an update"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-05-12T06:08:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rsync maintainers indicate a pull request to fix the issue is forthcoming"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-05-28T09:40:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 requests an update"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-06-17T04:19:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 requests an update"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-08-18T11:59:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 requests an update"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-08-23T09:17:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rsync maintainers indicate a pull request to remediate the issue has been made and a feature release is forthcoming"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-09-02T04:23:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 indicates intention to assign a CVE and perform a coordinated disclosure with the rsync maintainers upon the upcoming feature release"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-09-09T11:18:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 provides rsync maintainers a reserved CVE identifier and requests the date for the expected feature release"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-11-11T04:42:00.000Z",
          "value": "Rapid7 indicates intention to publish the CVE record on November 18, 2025."
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-11-18T14:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "This disclosure"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Rsync: Out of bounds array access via negative index",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7",
    "assignerShortName": "rapid7",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-10158",
    "datePublished": "2025-11-18T14:24:19.210Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-09-09T11:15:17.585Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-11-19T16:48:56.591Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2025-10158",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "epss": "0.00063",
      "percentile": "0.19281"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-10158\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@rapid7.com\",\"published\":\"2025-11-18T15:16:25.433\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-11-19T19:15:16.750\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A malicious client acting as the receiver of an rsync file transfer can trigger an out of bounds read of a heap based buffer, via a negative array index. The \\n\\nmalicious \\n\\nrsync client requires at least read access to the remote rsync module in order to trigger the issue.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cve@rapid7.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve@rapid7.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-129\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://attackerkb.com/assessments/fbacb2a6-d1cd-4011-bb3a-f06b1c8306b1\",\"source\":\"cve@rapid7.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/commit/797e17fc4a6f15e3b1756538a9f812b63942686f\",\"source\":\"cve@rapid7.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"Rsync: Out of bounds array access via negative index\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Calum Hutton\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"rsync\", \"product\": \"rsync\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"3.4.1\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-03-19T06:11:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 makes initial outreach to rsync maintainers\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-03-19T10:04:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rsync maintainers confirm outreach\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-03-20T10:34:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 provides rsync maintainers a technical writeup and PoC to reproduce the issue\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-04-02T03:05:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 requests confirmation of findings\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-04-06T09:30:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rsync maintainers indicate more time is needed\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-04-16T05:31:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rsync maintainers reproduce the issue and dispute its security impact due to uncertainty around viability of heap manipulation during exploitation\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-04-17T01:56:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 indicates manipulating the heap is nuanced and CVE assignment is both prudent and best practice in this instance\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-05-07T09:08:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 requests an update\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-05-12T06:08:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rsync maintainers indicate a pull request to fix the issue is forthcoming\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-05-28T09:40:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 requests an update\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-06-17T04:19:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 requests an update\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-08-18T11:59:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 requests an update\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-08-23T09:17:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rsync maintainers indicate a pull request to remediate the issue has been made and a feature release is forthcoming\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-09-02T04:23:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 indicates intention to assign a CVE and perform a coordinated disclosure with the rsync maintainers upon the upcoming feature release\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-09-09T11:18:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 provides rsync maintainers a reserved CVE identifier and requests the date for the expected feature release\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-11-11T04:42:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Rapid7 indicates intention to publish the CVE record on November 18, 2025.\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-11-18T14:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"This disclosure\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-11-18T14:20:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/commit/797e17fc4a6f15e3b1756538a9f812b63942686f\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://attackerkb.com/assessments/fbacb2a6-d1cd-4011-bb3a-f06b1c8306b1\", \"tags\": [\"technical-description\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.5.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A malicious client acting as the receiver of an rsync file transfer can trigger an out of bounds read of a heap based buffer, via a negative array index. The \\n\\nmalicious \\n\\nrsync client requires at least read access to the remote rsync module in order to trigger the issue.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"A malicious client acting as the receiver of an rsync file transfer can trigger an out of bounds read of a heap based buffer, via a negative array index. The \\n\\nmalicious \\n\\nrsync client requires at least read access to the remote rsync module in order to trigger the issue.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-129\", \"description\": \"CWE-129 Improper Validation of Array Index\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7\", \"shortName\": \"rapid7\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-18T14:45:58.065Z\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-10158\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-11-19T16:15:02.998218Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-19T16:15:07.191Z\"}}]}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-10158\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-18T14:45:58.065Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-09-09T11:15:17.585Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-11-18T14:24:19.210Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"rapid7\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.