CWE-178
AllowedImproper Handling of Case Sensitivity
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product does not properly account for differences in case sensitivity when accessing or determining the properties of a resource, leading to inconsistent results.
225 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-116469 (GCVE-0-2026-116469)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-26 10:35 – Updated: 2026-10-26 14:35| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/MISP/misp-guard/commit/9868b1d… | patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MISP | misp-guard |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.3
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:misp:misp-guard:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
qwen3.8:27b
1 event
advisory
bcp-05-x-01bcp-05-x-02bcp-05-x-03
Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.
| Model | Source | Identifier |
|---|---|---|
| qwen3.8:27b | ollama | qwen3.8:27b |
- Generator
-
patch2vuln.pyon 2026-10-26 10:33 - Model
qwen3.8:27b- Input
-
https://github.com/MISP/misp-guard/commit/9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c.patch
26a847175a70… - Confidence
- medium
| Commit | Subject | Patch SHA-256 |
|---|---|---|
9868b1d93fc9
|
fix: [security] match categories and required taxonomies | 26a847175a70… |
Fix summary
The fix makes all policy-matching comparisons case-insensitive by applying .lower() to both the input value (tag name, attribute category, sharing-group UUID) and the configured policy value (required taxonomy prefix, allowed tags, blocked categories, blocked UUIDs) before performing the comparison. This ensures that a tag such as 'TLP:AMBER' is correctly recognized as belonging to the 'tlp' taxonomy and is checked against the allowed-tags list, and that a blocked category or UUID is matched regardless of letter case.
Patch summary
In src/mispguard.py, four comparison sites were changed: (1) check_required_taxonomy_exists now uses tag['name'].lower().startswith(required_taxonomy.lower() + ':') instead of a case-sensitive startswith; (2) check_required_taxonomy_tags_allowed applies .lower() to both the tag name and the required taxonomy prefix in the startswith check; (3) check_blocked_attribute_categories compares attribute['category'].lower() against a lowercased list of blocked categories; (4) check_blocked_analyst_data_sharing_groups_uuids compares the UUID in lowercase against a lowercased list of blocked UUIDs. Ninety-one lines of test cases were added to src/test/test_misp_guard.py covering mixed-case TLP tags in required-taxonomy checks and mixed-case blocked attribute categories.
CVSS rationale
AV:N: The MISP feed is consumed over the network (HTTP). AC:L: Exploitation requires only changing the letter case of a tag, category, or UUID string. AT:N: No log or audit tampering is needed. PR:L: The attacker needs the ability to create or modify events in a MISP instance, which typically requires a low-privilege user account or a connected instance. UI:N: No user interaction is required. VC:H: The primary impact is unauthorized disclosure of data that the operator intended to restrict (non-allowed TLP tags, blocked categories, blocked sharing groups are forwarded to feed consumers). VI:N: The data content is not modified, only improperly shared. VA:N: No availability impact. SC/SI/SA:N: No secondary system impact is evidenced.
Weakness rationale
- CWE-178 The root cause is that string comparisons used to enforce security policies (taxonomy prefix matching, category blocking, UUID blocking) were case-sensitive, allowing an attacker to bypass the checks by altering letter case. CWE-178 is the most specific and accurate mapping.
- CWE-20 More broadly, the guard failed to validate input against the policy in a canonical form, which is a form of improper input validation. CWE-20 is included as a secondary, broader mapping.
Attack pattern rationale
- CAPEC-10 The attacker tampers with the letter case of tag names, attribute categories, or sharing-group UUIDs in MISP events to bypass the guard's policy checks. This is a form of parameter tampering where the input is modified in a way that the validation logic does not anticipate. CAPEC-10 is the closest available pattern; the uncertainty is that the tampering occurs in structured event data rather than in a traditional request parameter, but the underlying technique (modifying input to evade validation) aligns with this pattern.
Assumptions to verify
- The MISP Guard is assumed to operate as a proxy filtering outbound MISP feed data; the attacker is assumed to have the ability to create or modify events in a MISP instance that feeds through the guard. The patch does not specify the exact deployment topology.
- PR:L assumes that creating events in MISP requires at least a low-privilege authenticated account. If the guard is used in a context where events are pushed from a connected MISP instance without per-event authentication, PR could be None.
- The CAPEC-10 mapping is the closest available pattern; the actual attack involves modifying structured JSON event fields rather than traditional HTTP parameters, so the mapping is approximate.
- No specific affected or fixed version numbers are provided in the patch metadata; the version range is marked as unspecified.
- The commit message references 'ID 004' as a prior related fix, suggesting this is a follow-up to an earlier incomplete case-sensitivity fix, but no further details about that prior fix are available in the patch.
Model comparison
Selected qwen3.8:27b
by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.
| Model | Score | Agreement | Confidence | Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
qwen3.8:27b |
7 | 11 | medium | 5 |
- 2026-10-26 09:25 UTC Fix developed Corrective change authored (9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c): fix: [security] match categories and required taxonomies https://github.com/MISP/misp-guard/commit/9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c.patch
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-116469",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-26T13:32:47.760705Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T14:35:18.399Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:misp:misp-guard:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"src/mispguard.py"
],
"product": "misp-guard",
"programFiles": [
"src/mispguard.py"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/MISP/misp-guard",
"vendor": "MISP",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Luciano Righetti"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "tool",
"value": "Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP Guard, a proxy-based security filter for MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) feed distribution, contains a case-sensitivity flaw in multiple policy enforcement checks. The functions check_required_taxonomy_exists, check_required_taxonomy_tags_allowed, check_blocked_attribute_categories, and check_blocked_analyst_data_sharing_groups_uuids performed case-sensitive string comparisons when matching event tags, attribute categories, and sharing-group UUIDs against configured allow/block lists.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAn attacker with the ability to create or modify events in a MISP instance (or a connected instance that pushes events through the guard) could craft events using different letter case in taxonomy tag names, attribute categories, or sharing-group UUIDs to bypass the configured security policies. For example, if the policy requires the \u0027tlp\u0027 taxonomy with only \u0027tlp:clear\u0027 allowed, an event tagged \u0027TLP:AMBER\u0027 would not be recognized as belonging to the \u0027tlp\u0027 taxonomy and would therefore not be checked against the allowed-tags list, resulting in the event being forwarded to feed consumers. Similarly, a blocked attribute category such as \u0027Person\u0027 would not match a configured block entry of \u0027person\u0027, allowing the attribute to pass through the filter.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe security impact is unauthorized disclosure of threat-intelligence data that the operator intended to restrict. Events carrying non-allowed TLP (Traffic Light Protocol) markings, blocked attribute categories, or blocked sharing-group associations are forwarded to downstream feed consumers in violation of the configured distribution policy. This undermines the confidentiality controls that MISP Guard is designed to enforce.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability is trivially exploitable: the attacker only needs to alter the letter case of a tag, category, or UUID string. No authentication beyond normal MISP event-creation privileges is required, and no user interaction is needed.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "MISP Guard, a proxy-based security filter for MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) feed distribution, contains a case-sensitivity flaw in multiple policy enforcement checks. The functions check_required_taxonomy_exists, check_required_taxonomy_tags_allowed, check_blocked_attribute_categories, and check_blocked_analyst_data_sharing_groups_uuids performed case-sensitive string comparisons when matching event tags, attribute categories, and sharing-group UUIDs against configured allow/block lists.\n\nAn attacker with the ability to create or modify events in a MISP instance (or a connected instance that pushes events through the guard) could craft events using different letter case in taxonomy tag names, attribute categories, or sharing-group UUIDs to bypass the configured security policies. For example, if the policy requires the \u0027tlp\u0027 taxonomy with only \u0027tlp:clear\u0027 allowed, an event tagged \u0027TLP:AMBER\u0027 would not be recognized as belonging to the \u0027tlp\u0027 taxonomy and would therefore not be checked against the allowed-tags list, resulting in the event being forwarded to feed consumers. Similarly, a blocked attribute category such as \u0027Person\u0027 would not match a configured block entry of \u0027person\u0027, allowing the attribute to pass through the filter.\n\nThe security impact is unauthorized disclosure of threat-intelligence data that the operator intended to restrict. Events carrying non-allowed TLP (Traffic Light Protocol) markings, blocked attribute categories, or blocked sharing-group associations are forwarded to downstream feed consumers in violation of the configured distribution policy. This undermines the confidentiality controls that MISP Guard is designed to enforce.\n\nThe vulnerability is trivially exploitable: the attacker only needs to alter the letter case of a tag, category, or UUID string. No authentication beyond normal MISP event-creation privileges is required, and no user interaction is needed."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-10",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-10 Parameter Tampering"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"format": "SSVC",
"other": {
"content": {
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "Supplier",
"timestamp": "2026-10-26T10:33:59Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "SSVC"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178 Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T10:35:51.992Z",
"orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
"shortName": "CIRCL"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Security patch",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/misp-guard/commit/9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix makes all policy-matching comparisons case-insensitive by applying .lower() to both the input value (tag name, attribute category, sharing-group UUID) and the configured policy value (required taxonomy prefix, allowed tags, blocked categories, blocked UUIDs) before performing the comparison. This ensures that a tag such as \u0027TLP:AMBER\u0027 is correctly recognized as belonging to the \u0027tlp\u0027 taxonomy and is checked against the allowed-tags list, and that a blocked category or UUID is matched regardless of letter case.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The fix makes all policy-matching comparisons case-insensitive by applying .lower() to both the input value (tag name, attribute category, sharing-group UUID) and the configured policy value (required taxonomy prefix, allowed tags, blocked categories, blocked UUIDs) before performing the comparison. This ensures that a tag such as \u0027TLP:AMBER\u0027 is correctly recognized as belonging to the \u0027tlp\u0027 taxonomy and is checked against the allowed-tags list, and that a blocked category or UUID is matched regardless of letter case."
}
],
"title": "MISP Guard Case-Sensitive Policy Bypass Allows Unauthorized Feed Data Forwarding",
"x_gcve": [
{
"extensions": {
"bcp-05-x-01": {
"ai_annotations": [
{
"ai_level": "generated",
"description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
"gna_source": 1,
"models": [
{
"gna_source": 1,
"identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
"name": "qwen3.8:27b",
"source": "ollama"
}
],
"review_status": "partial",
"scope": "record",
"tags": [
"ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
"ai-computer-assisted:classification"
]
}
]
},
"bcp-05-x-02": {
"x_patch2vuln": {
"assumptions": [
"The MISP Guard is assumed to operate as a proxy filtering outbound MISP feed data; the attacker is assumed to have the ability to create or modify events in a MISP instance that feeds through the guard. The patch does not specify the exact deployment topology.",
"PR:L assumes that creating events in MISP requires at least a low-privilege authenticated account. If the guard is used in a context where events are pushed from a connected MISP instance without per-event authentication, PR could be None.",
"The CAPEC-10 mapping is the closest available pattern; the actual attack involves modifying structured JSON event fields rather than traditional HTTP parameters, so the mapping is approximate.",
"No specific affected or fixed version numbers are provided in the patch metadata; the version range is marked as unspecified.",
"The commit message references \u0027ID 004\u0027 as a prior related fix, suggesting this is a follow-up to an earlier incomplete case-sensitivity fix, but no further details about that prior fix are available in the patch."
],
"capecRationale": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-10",
"rationale": "The attacker tampers with the letter case of tag names, attribute categories, or sharing-group UUIDs in MISP events to bypass the guard\u0027s policy checks. This is a form of parameter tampering where the input is modified in a way that the validation logic does not anticipate. CAPEC-10 is the closest available pattern; the uncertainty is that the tampering occurs in structured event data rather than in a traditional request parameter, but the underlying technique (modifying input to evade validation) aligns with this pattern."
}
],
"commit": "9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c",
"confidence": "medium",
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Luciano Righetti"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "tool",
"value": "Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context)"
}
],
"cvssRationale": "AV:N: The MISP feed is consumed over the network (HTTP). AC:L: Exploitation requires only changing the letter case of a tag, category, or UUID string. AT:N: No log or audit tampering is needed. PR:L: The attacker needs the ability to create or modify events in a MISP instance, which typically requires a low-privilege user account or a connected instance. UI:N: No user interaction is required. VC:H: The primary impact is unauthorized disclosure of data that the operator intended to restrict (non-allowed TLP tags, blocked categories, blocked sharing groups are forwarded to feed consumers). VI:N: The data content is not modified, only improperly shared. VA:N: No availability impact. SC/SI/SA:N: No secondary system impact is evidenced.",
"fixSummary": "The fix makes all policy-matching comparisons case-insensitive by applying .lower() to both the input value (tag name, attribute category, sharing-group UUID) and the configured policy value (required taxonomy prefix, allowed tags, blocked categories, blocked UUIDs) before performing the comparison. This ensures that a tag such as \u0027TLP:AMBER\u0027 is correctly recognized as belonging to the \u0027tlp\u0027 taxonomy and is checked against the allowed-tags list, and that a blocked category or UUID is matched regardless of letter case.",
"generatedAt": "2026-10-26T10:33:59.935580Z",
"generator": "patch2vuln.py",
"model": "qwen3.8:27b",
"modelComparison": {
"rankings": [
{
"agreementScore": 11,
"assumptionCount": 5,
"confidence": "medium",
"model": "qwen3.8:27b",
"score": 7
}
],
"selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
"selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
"selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
},
"patchSha256": "26a847175a70394b7c0feaa57f7286f41fb131fc28c4c540412e88018c749628",
"patchSummary": "In src/mispguard.py, four comparison sites were changed: (1) check_required_taxonomy_exists now uses tag[\u0027name\u0027].lower().startswith(required_taxonomy.lower() + \u0027:\u0027) instead of a case-sensitive startswith; (2) check_required_taxonomy_tags_allowed applies .lower() to both the tag name and the required taxonomy prefix in the startswith check; (3) check_blocked_attribute_categories compares attribute[\u0027category\u0027].lower() against a lowercased list of blocked categories; (4) check_blocked_analyst_data_sharing_groups_uuids compares the UUID in lowercase against a lowercased list of blocked UUIDs. Ninety-one lines of test cases were added to src/test/test_misp_guard.py covering mixed-case TLP tags in required-taxonomy checks and mixed-case blocked attribute categories.",
"patchTruncated": false,
"patches": [
{
"commit": "9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c",
"date": "Mon, 26 Oct 2026 10:25:52 +0100",
"patchSha256": "26a847175a70394b7c0feaa57f7286f41fb131fc28c4c540412e88018c749628",
"source": "https://github.com/MISP/misp-guard/commit/9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c.patch",
"sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/misp-guard/commit/9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c.patch",
"subject": "fix: [security] match categories and required taxonomies"
}
],
"source": "https://github.com/MISP/misp-guard/commit/9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c.patch",
"ssvc": {
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "Supplier",
"timestamp": "2026-10-26T10:33:59Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"subject": "fix: [security] match categories and required taxonomies",
"weaknessRationale": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"rationale": "The root cause is that string comparisons used to enforce security policies (taxonomy prefix matching, category blocking, UUID blocking) were case-sensitive, allowing an attacker to bypass the checks by altering letter case. CWE-178 is the most specific and accurate mapping."
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"rationale": "More broadly, the guard failed to validate input against the policy in a canonical form, which is a form of improper input validation. CWE-20 is included as a secondary, broader mapping."
}
]
}
},
"bcp-05-x-03": {
"x_timeline": {
"events": [
{
"description": "Corrective change authored (9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c): fix: [security] match categories and required taxonomies",
"id": "evt-fix-developed-1",
"references": [
"https://github.com/MISP/misp-guard/commit/9868b1d93fc9cc40cc7c69ca11c86afd825bbc1c.patch"
],
"timestamp": "2026-10-26T09:25:52Z",
"type": "fix-developed"
}
]
}
}
},
"recordType": "advisory",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20344"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
"assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-116469",
"datePublished": "2026-10-26T10:35:51.992Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-26T10:35:05.591Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T14:35:18.399Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-114132 (GCVE-0-2026-114132)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-21 17:50 – Updated: 2026-10-23 15:10| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/security/advisories/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/f6cfee52cf957… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/releases/tag/v4.6.2 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-114132",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-23T14:47:57.588088Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-23T15:10:37.684Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "nuxt",
"vendor": "nuxt",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.6.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. Prior to 4.6.2, Nuxt resolves pages case-insensitively by default while Nitro matches server-side route-rule keys case-sensitively, allowing a request whose path differs only by letter case to render without the server rule intended for that page. The mismatch can skip redirect, headers, proxy, ssr: false, and noScripts, and can cause getRouteRules(event) and matchRouteRules to return no rule for the case variant. Applications that set router.options.sensitive: true in nuxt.config are not affected; setting sensitive only in app/router.options.ts does not establish this exclusion because the server follows the nuxt.config value. Access checks implemented in server middleware, page route middleware, or page data fetching remain independent of this matcher. This issue is fixed in version 4.6.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-21T17:50:11.250Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/security/advisories/GHSA-vjh5-4x84-xrqp",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/security/advisories/GHSA-vjh5-4x84-xrqp"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/f6cfee52cf9576ddc4f4ee83b486969328b358f8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/f6cfee52cf9576ddc4f4ee83b486969328b358f8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/releases/tag/v4.6.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/releases/tag/v4.6.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-vjh5-4x84-xrqp",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Nuxt: Server-side route rules (`redirect`, `headers`, `proxy`, `ssr`) are skipped for case-variant paths when routing is case-insensitive"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-114132",
"datePublished": "2026-10-21T17:50:11.250Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-20T21:53:58.473Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-23T15:10:37.684Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-111448 (GCVE-0-2026-111448)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-16 03:41 – Updated: 2026-10-16 15:00- CWE-178 - Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/wheels-dev/wheels/security/adv… | vendor-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-111448",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-16T14:59:56.035815Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T15:00:16.100Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Wheels",
"repo": "https://github.com/wheels-dev/wheels",
"vendor": "Wheels",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.2.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Wheels 4.0.0 through 4.1.2 uses case-insensitive comparisons in path-containment checks on case-sensitive filesystems. Canonical-path checks for zip entries, package mappings, development assets/docs, guide images and image tags can accept paths through an existing symlink to a case-distinct sibling directory, allowing access outside the intended root, including limited file disclosure. Separately, the CLI database-dump output check can write outside the application root to an existing writable case-distinct sibling directory; that action requires the CLI POST, loopback and password gate. This is fixed in 4.2.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178 Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T03:41:58.401Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wheels-dev/wheels/security/advisories/GHSA-m63x-8m98-225v"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "CVE-Request-form 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-111448",
"datePublished": "2026-10-16T03:41:58.401Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-16T03:41:57.639Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T15:00:16.100Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-109841 (GCVE-0-2026-109841)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-15 18:22 – Updated: 2026-10-16 20:04- CWE-178 - Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-109841",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-16T20:04:31.429219Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T20:04:41.388Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/undici",
"product": "undici",
"vendor": "undici",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.30.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.15.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.30.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.12.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "8.12.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Kushalkhemka"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "mayank-jangid-moon"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "tool",
"value": "opensec-intelligence"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "mcollina"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "UlisesGascon"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "skigeek16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "KhafraDev"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "undici is an HTTP client library for Node.js. In versions 7.15.0 through 7.30.0 and 8.0.0 through 8.12.1, its fetch() implementation verifies Subresource Integrity metadata by matching the algorithm token against a lowercase-only set, even though the SRI specification defines the token by its ASCII-lowercase form, so a valid but non-lowercase token such as an uppercase or mixed-case SHA256 is treated as unknown and skipped. When no recognized algorithm remains, undici treats the integrity list as empty and accepts the response, so a server returning a body that does not match the pinned digest passes the check. An attacker who controls only the response body can therefore deliver attacker-controlled bytes to an application that pinned a valid uppercase or mixed-case SRI token, with no integrity error, affecting response integrity only. The issue is fixed in undici 7.30.1 and 8.12.2, which normalize the algorithm token to ASCII lowercase before validation, and users should upgrade to one of those versions or later. As a workaround, use lowercase algorithm tokens such as sha256, sha384, or sha512 in integrity metadata."
}
],
"value": "undici is an HTTP client library for Node.js. In versions 7.15.0 through 7.30.0 and 8.0.0 through 8.12.1, its fetch() implementation verifies Subresource Integrity metadata by matching the algorithm token against a lowercase-only set, even though the SRI specification defines the token by its ASCII-lowercase form, so a valid but non-lowercase token such as an uppercase or mixed-case SHA256 is treated as unknown and skipped. When no recognized algorithm remains, undici treats the integrity list as empty and accepts the response, so a server returning a body that does not match the pinned digest passes the check. An attacker who controls only the response body can therefore deliver attacker-controlled bytes to an application that pinned a valid uppercase or mixed-case SRI token, with no integrity error, affecting response integrity only. The issue is fixed in undici 7.30.1 and 8.12.2, which normalize the algorithm token to ASCII lowercase before validation, and users should upgrade to one of those versions or later. As a workaround, use lowercase algorithm tokens such as sha256, sha384, or sha512 in integrity metadata."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T18:22:06.283Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-f72v-6w45-q472"
},
{
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
}
],
"title": "undici vulnerable to Subresource Integrity bypass via non-lowercase algorithm tokens",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-109841",
"datePublished": "2026-10-15T18:22:06.283Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-13T07:02:52.591Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T20:04:41.388Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-108721 (GCVE-0-2026-108721)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-11 12:19 – Updated: 2026-10-13 17:01- CWE-178 - Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://hackmd.io/@haind/rJHI_S6IiMl | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/iFurySt/open-codex-computer-us… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/iFurySt/open-codex-computer-us… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/iFurySt/open-codex-computer-use | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/open-compute… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| iFurySt | open-computer-use |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.0.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-108721",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-13T15:49:39.503998Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T17:01:12.777Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/iFurySt/open-codex-computer-use",
"product": "open-computer-use",
"repo": "https://github.com/iFurySt/open-codex-computer-use",
"vendor": "iFurySt",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "HaiND from the Post and Telecommunication Institute of Technology"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Open Computer Use through 1.0.0 on macOS contains an improper case sensitivity handling vulnerability that allows local MCP callers to bypass the password-manager denylist using case-variant bundle identifiers. Attackers, including prompt-injected model turns, can pass identifiers like com.1Password.1Password to get_app_state and action tools to read accessibility trees, capture screenshots, and drive unlocked password manager interfaces."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-11T12:19:31.981Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/@haind/rJHI_S6IiMl"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/iFurySt/open-codex-computer-use/blob/8a3a7dec06402db2d760368cb24676ad3ba42c49/packages/OpenComputerUseKit/Sources/OpenComputerUseKit/AppDiscovery.swift#L144-L198"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/iFurySt/open-codex-computer-use/blob/8a3a7dec06402db2d760368cb24676ad3ba42c49/packages/OpenComputerUseKit/Sources/OpenComputerUseKit/AppDiscovery.swift#L554-L572"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/iFurySt/open-codex-computer-use"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Open Computer Use through 1.0.0 Denylist Bypass via Case-Variant Bundle ID",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/open-computer-use-through-1.0.0-denylist-bypass-via-case-variant-bundle-id"
}
],
"title": "Open Computer Use through 1.0.0 Denylist Bypass via Case-Variant Bundle ID",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108721",
"datePublished": "2026-10-11T12:19:31.981Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-11T01:52:29.003Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T17:01:12.777Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-107832 (GCVE-0-2026-107832)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-13 13:23 – Updated: 2026-10-15 19:14- CWE-178 - Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-107832",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-15T17:34:08.435956Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T19:14:58.255Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/fastify",
"product": "fastify",
"vendor": "fastify",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.12.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.12.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.12.6",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "uttej-badwane"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "mcollina"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "UlisesGascon"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "kian0417"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "fastify is a fast and low overhead web framework for Node.js. In versions 5.12.2 through 5.12.5, the routine that lowercases header names declared in a route schema does not lowercase the enum or const header names nested inside a propertyNames subschema. As a result, a header allow-list or deny-list written with canonical (non-lowercase) casing never matches the incoming lowercased header, so a restricted header passes validation and reaches the route handler. An attacker can therefore bypass a case-sensitive header validation rule and smuggle a forbidden header past the schema, affecting the integrity of request handling. The issue is fixed in fastify 5.12.6, and users should upgrade to 5.12.6 or later. There is no workaround other than upgrading, though applications can declare header names in lowercase to avoid the mismatch."
}
],
"value": "fastify is a fast and low overhead web framework for Node.js. In versions 5.12.2 through 5.12.5, the routine that lowercases header names declared in a route schema does not lowercase the enum or const header names nested inside a propertyNames subschema. As a result, a header allow-list or deny-list written with canonical (non-lowercase) casing never matches the incoming lowercased header, so a restricted header passes validation and reaches the route handler. An attacker can therefore bypass a case-sensitive header validation rule and smuggle a forbidden header past the schema, affecting the integrity of request handling. The issue is fixed in fastify 5.12.6, and users should upgrade to 5.12.6 or later. There is no workaround other than upgrading, though applications can declare header names in lowercase to avoid the mismatch."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T13:23:24.217Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify/security/advisories/GHSA-389g-gv7q-r4x8"
},
{
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
}
],
"title": "fastify vulnerable to header validation bypass via case-sensitive propertyNames",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-107832",
"datePublished": "2026-10-13T13:23:24.217Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-08T21:50:49.357Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T19:14:58.255Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-107381 (GCVE-0-2026-107381)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-14 14:53 – Updated: 2026-10-18 13:36| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/secu… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/comm… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/rele… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| darylldoyle | svg-sanitizer |
Affected:
< 1.0.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-107381",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-18T13:36:10.730964Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-18T13:36:27.865Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/security/advisories/GHSA-m9xh-6747-9r6f"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "svg-sanitizer",
"vendor": "darylldoyle",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.0.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "svg-sanitizer is a PHP SVG/XML sanitizer. Prior to 1.0.0, Resolver::processReferences() in src/ElementReference/Resolver.php builds the SVG \u003cuse\u003e reference graph with a case-sensitive href attribute predicate before cleanHrefAttributes() normalizes mixed-case names. An attacker can provide xlink:HrEf on nested \u003cuse\u003e elements so the graph omits those references, after which the sanitizer converts the attribute to canonical xlink:href and returns the live nesting structure without applying the useNestingLimit protection. A consuming application that renders the sanitized SVG can therefore be exposed to the resource exhaustion that control is designed to prevent. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T14:53:40.415Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/security/advisories/GHSA-m9xh-6747-9r6f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/security/advisories/GHSA-m9xh-6747-9r6f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/commit/2dff6628314de8519155b7feb218bbe132785757",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/commit/2dff6628314de8519155b7feb218bbe132785757"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/releases/tag/1.0.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/releases/tag/1.0.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-m9xh-6747-9r6f",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "svg-sanitizer: Mixed-case xlink:HrEf skips the `\u003cuse\u003e` nesting-DoS check in Resolver::processReferences"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-107381",
"datePublished": "2026-10-14T14:53:40.415Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-07T21:07:54.988Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-18T13:36:27.865Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106503 (GCVE-0-2026-106503)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 21:37 – Updated: 2026-10-09 01:55| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/11c… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/a91… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/e30… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| backstage | backstage |
Affected:
< 1.49.6
Affected: >= 1.50.0-next.0, < 1.50.5 Affected: >= 1.51.0-next.0, < 1.54.6 |
|
| @backstage | plugin-scaffolder-backend |
Affected:
< 3.3.1
Affected: >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.1 Affected: >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.3 Affected: >= 4.0.4, < 4.1.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106503",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-09T01:55:45.447568Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-09T01:55:54.101Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "backstage",
"vendor": "backstage",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.49.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.50.0-next.0, \u003c 1.50.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.51.0-next.0, \u003c 1.54.6"
}
]
},
{
"product": "plugin-scaffolder-backend",
"vendor": "@backstage",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.3.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.4.0, \u003c 3.4.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.0.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.4, \u003c 4.1.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Prior to 3.3.1, 3.4.1, 4.0.3 and 4.1.0, the @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend package is affected by scaffolder action input authorization bypass. An authenticated user with access to affected Scaffolder templates could bypass configured action restrictions. Depending on integration credentials, this could grant unauthorized access to repositories and related source-control resources. This issue is fixed in versions 3.3.1, 3.4.1, 4.0.3 and 4.1.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284: Improper Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T21:37:33.675Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-hmp2-4m7g-22cv",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-hmp2-4m7g-22cv"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/11c1384c0649b8ab26391c6a4e4f34b80ab0d188",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/11c1384c0649b8ab26391c6a4e4f34b80ab0d188"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/a91ed72d540e80b62a73b39bb1563ff5018d52d1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/a91ed72d540e80b62a73b39bb1563ff5018d52d1"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/e307e4f487103d815e484291b3fda778ab9983bf",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/e307e4f487103d815e484291b3fda778ab9983bf"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.49.6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.49.6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.50.5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.50.5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.54.6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.54.6"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-hmp2-4m7g-22cv",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Backstage: Scaffolder action input authorization bypass"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106503",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T21:37:33.675Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T18:46:47.766Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-09T01:55:54.101Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106497 (GCVE-0-2026-106497)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 21:18 – Updated: 2026-10-07 16:19| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/214… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| backstage | backstage |
Affected:
< 1.54.6
|
|
| @backstage | plugin-catalog-backend |
Affected:
< 3.9.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106497",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-07T16:19:14.828108Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T16:19:32.903Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "backstage",
"vendor": "backstage",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.54.6"
}
]
},
{
"product": "plugin-catalog-backend",
"vendor": "@backstage",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.9.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Prior to 3.9.1, the @backstage/plugin-catalog-backend package is affected by inconsistent catalog property permission evaluation. In deployments that use affected value-based catalog permission conditions as a confidentiality boundary, an authenticated user could receive catalog entity data that policy authors intended to restrict. This issue is fixed in version 3.9.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T21:18:31.150Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-8429-xpcj-3cg5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-8429-xpcj-3cg5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/21424faa2e280a6bc6b9e5c5245952f16aafca7b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/21424faa2e280a6bc6b9e5c5245952f16aafca7b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.54.6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.54.6"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-8429-xpcj-3cg5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Backstage: Inconsistent catalog property permission evaluation"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106497",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T21:18:31.150Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T18:46:47.766Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T16:19:32.903Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105608 (GCVE-0-2026-105608)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-26 17:52 – Updated: 2026-10-26 19:38- CWE-178 - Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HashiCorp | Consul |
Affected:
2.0.4 , < 2.1.0
(semver)
|
|
| HashiCorp | Consul Enterprise |
Affected:
2.0.4 , < 2.1.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105608",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-26T19:05:41.796579Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T19:38:29.607Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"64 bit",
"32 bit",
"x86",
"ARM",
"MacOS",
"Windows",
"Linux"
],
"product": "Consul",
"repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul",
"vendor": "HashiCorp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"64 bit",
"32 bit",
"x86",
"ARM",
"MacOS",
"Windows",
"Linux"
],
"product": "Consul Enterprise",
"repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul",
"vendor": "HashiCorp",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "1.21.18",
"status": "affected"
},
{
"at": "1.21.19",
"status": "unaffected"
},
{
"at": "1.22.12",
"status": "affected"
}
],
"lessThan": "2.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue was reported to HashiCorp by Immad Sahin of ZeroTrail and Yonghwa Lee of Theori."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eHashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise are vulnerable to an authorization bypass in service mesh proxy registration. This may allow a user with service write permission to apply Envoy escape-hatch configuration without the required mesh write permission. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-105608) is fixed in Consul Community Edition 2.1.0 and Consul Enterprise 2.1.0 and 1.21.19.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr/\u003e"
}
],
"value": "HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise are vulnerable to an authorization bypass in service mesh proxy registration. This may allow a user with service write permission to apply Envoy escape-hatch configuration without the required mesh write permission. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-105608) is fixed in Consul Community Edition 2.1.0 and Consul Enterprise 2.1.0 and 1.21.19."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-267",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-267: Leverage Alternate Encoding"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T17:53:16.484Z",
"orgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
"shortName": "HashiCorp"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-47-consul-vulnerable-to-an-authorization-bypass-in-service-mesh-registration/77912"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "HCSEC-2026-47",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Consul vulnerable to an authorization bypass in service mesh registration"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
"assignerShortName": "HashiCorp",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105608",
"datePublished": "2026-10-26T17:52:33.021Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T16:15:56.816Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T19:38:29.607Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation MIT-44
Strategy: Input Validation
Avoid making decisions based on names of resources (e.g. files) if those resources can have alternate names.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation MIT-20
Strategy: Input Validation
Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.