CVE-2026-12490 (GCVE-0-2026-12490)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-25 05:24 – Updated: 2026-06-25 05:24
VLAI
Title
Bypass of client certificate verification with transfer over TLS
Summary
When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.
Severity
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-1… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs | NSD |
Affected:
4.10.1 , < 4.14.3
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-06-25 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "NSD",
"vendor": "NLnet Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.14.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.10.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Qifan Zhang from Palo Alto Networks"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Transfer security restrictions for client certificates can be bypassed completely if the attacker can match the other access control conditions, and the tls-auth-xfr-only option is not explicitly set to yes (which it by default is not)"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284: Improper Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T05:24:41.814Z",
"orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"shortName": "NLnet Labs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-12490.txt"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue is fixed starting with version 4.14.3."
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "NLnet Labs shares patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-17T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Qifan Zhang verifies patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Fix released with version 4.14.3"
}
],
"title": "Bypass of client certificate verification with transfer over TLS",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-12490",
"datePublished": "2026-06-25T05:24:41.814Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-17T06:44:23.686Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T05:24:41.814Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…