cve-2022-41352
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-09-26 00:00
Modified
2025-02-03 14:34
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.
References
CISA Known exploited vulnerability
Data from the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog
Date added: 2022-10-20
Due date: 2022-11-10
Required action: Apply updates per vendor instructions.
Used in ransomware: Unknown
Notes: https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41352
{ containers: { adp: [ { providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2024-08-03T12:42:46.297Z", orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", shortName: "CVE", }, references: [ { tags: [ "x_transferred", ], url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories", }, { tags: [ "x_transferred", ], url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center", }, { tags: [ "x_transferred", ], url: "https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532", }, { tags: [ "x_transferred", ], url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html", }, { tags: [ "x_transferred", ], url: "https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/", }, ], title: "CVE Program Container", }, { metrics: [ { cvssV3_1: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 9.8, baseSeverity: "CRITICAL", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.1", }, }, { other: { content: { id: "CVE-2022-41352", options: [ { Exploitation: "active", }, { Automatable: "yes", }, { "Technical Impact": "total", }, ], role: "CISA Coordinator", timestamp: "2025-02-03T14:33:44.078384Z", version: "2.0.3", }, type: "ssvc", }, }, { other: { content: { dateAdded: "2022-10-20", reference: "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?search_api_fulltext=CVE-2022-41352", }, type: "kev", }, }, ], problemTypes: [ { descriptions: [ { cweId: "CWE-22", description: "CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')", lang: "en", type: "CWE", }, ], }, ], providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2025-02-03T14:34:03.877Z", orgId: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", shortName: "CISA-ADP", }, title: "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", }, ], cna: { affected: [ { product: "n/a", vendor: "n/a", versions: [ { status: "affected", version: "n/a", }, ], }, ], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.", }, ], problemTypes: [ { descriptions: [ { description: "n/a", lang: "en", type: "text", }, ], }, ], providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2023-10-09T23:19:12.543Z", orgId: "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", shortName: "mitre", }, references: [ { url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories", }, { url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center", }, { url: "https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532", }, { url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html", }, { url: "https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/", }, ], }, }, cveMetadata: { assignerOrgId: "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", assignerShortName: "mitre", cveId: "CVE-2022-41352", datePublished: "2022-09-26T00:00:00.000Z", dateReserved: "2022-09-26T00:00:00.000Z", dateUpdated: "2025-02-03T14:34:03.877Z", state: "PUBLISHED", }, dataType: "CVE_RECORD", dataVersion: "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { cisa_known_exploited: { cveID: "CVE-2022-41352", cwes: "[\"CWE-22\"]", dateAdded: "2022-10-20", dueDate: "2022-11-10", knownRansomwareCampaignUse: "Unknown", notes: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41352", product: "Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)", requiredAction: "Apply updates per vendor instructions.", shortDescription: "Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) allows an attacker to upload arbitrary files using cpio package to gain incorrect access to any other user accounts.", vendorProject: "Synacor", vulnerabilityName: "Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability", }, nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-41352\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2022-09-26T02:15:10.733\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-02-25T02:00:02.097\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se ha detectado un problema en Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) versiones 8.8.15 y 9.0. Un atacante puede descargar archivos arbitrarios mediante amavisd por medio de un loophole de cpio (extracción a /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) que puede conllevar a un acceso incorrecto a cualquier otra cuenta de usuario. Zimbra recomienda pax sobre cpio. Además, pax está en los prerrequisitos de Zimbra en Ubuntu; sin embargo, pax ya no forma parte de una instalación por defecto de Red Hat después de RHEL 6 (o CentOS 6). Una vez instalado pax, amavisd lo prefiere automáticamente sobre cpio.\\n\\n\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9},{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"cisaExploitAdd\":\"2022-10-20\",\"cisaActionDue\":\"2022-11-10\",\"cisaRequiredAction\":\"Apply updates per vendor instructions.\",\"cisaVulnerabilityName\":\"Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability\",\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-22\"}]},{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-22\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:collaboration:8.8.15:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1B17C1A7-0F0A-4E7C-8C0C-0BBB0BF66C82\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:collaboration:9.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"685D9652-2934-4C13-8B36-40582C79BFC1\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Release Notes\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Release Notes\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}", vulnrichment: { containers: "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-03T12:42:46.297Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2022-41352\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"active\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-02-03T14:33:44.078384Z\"}}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"kev\", \"content\": {\"dateAdded\": \"2022-10-20\", \"reference\": \"https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?search_api_fulltext=CVE-2022-41352\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-22\", \"description\": \"CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-03T14:33:05.319Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"product\": \"n/a\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories\"}, {\"url\": \"https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center\"}, {\"url\": \"https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532\"}, {\"url\": \"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"text\", \"description\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"shortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2023-10-09T23:19:12.543Z\"}}}", cveMetadata: "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2022-41352\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-03T14:34:03.877Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2022-09-26T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"datePublished\": \"2022-09-26T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mitre\"}", dataType: "CVE_RECORD", dataVersion: "5.1", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.