fkie_cve-2022-41352
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2022-09-26 02:15
Modified
2025-04-03 18:54
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
zimbra | collaboration | 8.8.15 | |
zimbra | collaboration | 9.0.0 |
{ cisaActionDue: "2022-11-10", cisaExploitAdd: "2022-10-20", cisaRequiredAction: "Apply updates per vendor instructions.", cisaVulnerabilityName: "Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability", configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:collaboration:8.8.15:-:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "1B17C1A7-0F0A-4E7C-8C0C-0BBB0BF66C82", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:collaboration:9.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "685D9652-2934-4C13-8B36-40582C79BFC1", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.", }, { lang: "es", value: "Se ha detectado un problema en Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) versiones 8.8.15 y 9.0. Un atacante puede descargar archivos arbitrarios mediante amavisd por medio de un loophole de cpio (extracción a /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) que puede conllevar a un acceso incorrecto a cualquier otra cuenta de usuario. Zimbra recomienda pax sobre cpio. Además, pax está en los prerrequisitos de Zimbra en Ubuntu; sin embargo, pax ya no forma parte de una instalación por defecto de Red Hat después de RHEL 6 (o CentOS 6). Una vez instalado pax, amavisd lo prefiere automáticamente sobre cpio.\n\n", }, ], id: "CVE-2022-41352", lastModified: "2025-04-03T18:54:44.173", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 9.8, baseSeverity: "CRITICAL", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 5.9, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 9.8, baseSeverity: "CRITICAL", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 5.9, source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", type: "Secondary", }, ], }, published: "2022-09-26T02:15:10.733", references: [ { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Exploit", "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry", ], url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Mitigation", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Patch", "Release Notes", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Exploit", "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry", ], url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Mitigation", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", "Release Notes", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org", vulnStatus: "Analyzed", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-22", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-22", }, ], source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", type: "Secondary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.