fkie_cve-2022-41352
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2022-09-26 02:15
Modified
2025-04-03 18:54
Summary
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
zimbra collaboration 8.8.15
zimbra collaboration 9.0.0



{
   cisaActionDue: "2022-11-10",
   cisaExploitAdd: "2022-10-20",
   cisaRequiredAction: "Apply updates per vendor instructions.",
   cisaVulnerabilityName: "Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability",
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:collaboration:8.8.15:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "1B17C1A7-0F0A-4E7C-8C0C-0BBB0BF66C82",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:collaboration:9.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "685D9652-2934-4C13-8B36-40582C79BFC1",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Se ha detectado un problema en Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) versiones 8.8.15 y 9.0. Un atacante puede descargar archivos arbitrarios mediante amavisd por medio de un loophole de cpio (extracción a /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) que puede conllevar a un acceso incorrecto a cualquier otra cuenta de usuario. Zimbra recomienda pax sobre cpio. Además, pax está en los prerrequisitos de Zimbra en Ubuntu; sin embargo, pax ya no forma parte de una instalación por defecto de Red Hat después de RHEL 6 (o CentOS 6). Una vez instalado pax, amavisd lo prefiere automáticamente sobre cpio.\n\n",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2022-41352",
   lastModified: "2025-04-03T18:54:44.173",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 9.8,
               baseSeverity: "CRITICAL",
               confidentialityImpact: "HIGH",
               integrityImpact: "HIGH",
               privilegesRequired: "NONE",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 3.9,
            impactScore: 5.9,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
         },
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 9.8,
               baseSeverity: "CRITICAL",
               confidentialityImpact: "HIGH",
               integrityImpact: "HIGH",
               privilegesRequired: "NONE",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 3.9,
            impactScore: 5.9,
            source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
            type: "Secondary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2022-09-26T02:15:10.733",
   references: [
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Third Party Advisory",
            "VDB Entry",
         ],
         url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         tags: [
            "Mitigation",
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
            "Release Notes",
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         tags: [
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         tags: [
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Third Party Advisory",
            "VDB Entry",
         ],
         url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Mitigation",
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153&p=306532",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
            "Release Notes",
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org",
   vulnStatus: "Analyzed",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-22",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-22",
            },
         ],
         source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
         type: "Secondary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.