fkie_cve-2022-41352
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2022-09-26 02:15
Modified
2025-02-25 02:00
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
zimbra | collaboration | 8.8.15 | |
zimbra | collaboration | 9.0.0 |
{ "cisaActionDue": "2022-11-10", "cisaExploitAdd": "2022-10-20", "cisaRequiredAction": "Apply updates per vendor instructions.", "cisaVulnerabilityName": "Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability", "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:collaboration:8.8.15:-:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "1B17C1A7-0F0A-4E7C-8C0C-0BBB0BF66C82", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:collaboration:9.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "685D9652-2934-4C13-8B36-40582C79BFC1", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. An attacker can upload arbitrary files through amavis via a cpio loophole (extraction to /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) that can lead to incorrect access to any other user accounts. Zimbra recommends pax over cpio. Also, pax is in the prerequisites of Zimbra on Ubuntu; however, pax is no longer part of a default Red Hat installation after RHEL 6 (or CentOS 6). Once pax is installed, amavis automatically prefers it over cpio." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se ha detectado un problema en Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) versiones 8.8.15 y 9.0. Un atacante puede descargar archivos arbitrarios mediante amavisd por medio de un loophole de cpio (extracci\u00f3n a /opt/zimbra/jetty/webapps/zimbra/public) que puede conllevar a un acceso incorrecto a cualquier otra cuenta de usuario. Zimbra recomienda pax sobre cpio. Adem\u00e1s, pax est\u00e1 en los prerrequisitos de Zimbra en Ubuntu; sin embargo, pax ya no forma parte de una instalaci\u00f3n por defecto de Red Hat despu\u00e9s de RHEL 6 (o CentOS 6). Una vez instalado pax, amavisd lo prefiere autom\u00e1ticamente sobre cpio.\n\n" } ], "id": "CVE-2022-41352", "lastModified": "2025-02-25T02:00:02.097", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2022-09-26T02:15:10.733", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Mitigation", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153\u0026p=306532" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Patch", "Release Notes", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169458/Zimbra-Collaboration-Suite-TAR-Path-Traversal.html" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Mitigation", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://forums.zimbra.org/viewtopic.php?t=71153\u0026p=306532" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch", "Release Notes", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://www.secpod.com/blog/unpatched-rce-bug-in-zimbra-collaboration-suite-exploited-in-wild/" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-22" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-22" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.