cve-2015-4217
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2015-06-26 10:00
Modified
2024-08-06 06:11
Severity ?
Summary
The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a n/a Version: n/a
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:11:11.355Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "20150625 Multiple Default SSH Keys Vulnerabilities in Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_CISCO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150625-ironport"
          },
          {
            "name": "1032725",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032725"
          },
          {
            "name": "20150625 Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA Default SSH Host Keys Vulnerability",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_CISCO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39461"
          },
          {
            "name": "1032726",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032726"
          },
          {
            "name": "75418",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75418"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-06-25T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2016-12-23T18:57:01",
        "orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
        "shortName": "cisco"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "20150625 Multiple Default SSH Keys Vulnerabilities in Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_CISCO"
          ],
          "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150625-ironport"
        },
        {
          "name": "1032725",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032725"
        },
        {
          "name": "20150625 Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA Default SSH Host Keys Vulnerability",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_CISCO"
          ],
          "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39461"
        },
        {
          "name": "1032726",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032726"
        },
        {
          "name": "75418",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75418"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "psirt@cisco.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-4217",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20150625 Multiple Default SSH Keys Vulnerabilities in Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA",
              "refsource": "CISCO",
              "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150625-ironport"
            },
            {
              "name": "1032725",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032725"
            },
            {
              "name": "20150625 Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA Default SSH Host Keys Vulnerability",
              "refsource": "CISCO",
              "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39461"
            },
            {
              "name": "1032726",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032726"
            },
            {
              "name": "75418",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75418"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
    "assignerShortName": "cisco",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-4217",
    "datePublished": "2015-06-26T10:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2015-06-04T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:11:11.355Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-4217\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"published\":\"2015-06-26T10:59:04.343\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:30:39.247\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La caracter\u00edstica de soporte remoto en los dispositivos Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), y Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) anterior a 2015-06-25 utilice las mismas claves de anfitri\u00f3n SSH por defecto en las instalaciones de clientes diferentes, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos superar los mecanismos de protecci\u00f3n criptogr\u00e1fica mediante el aprovechamiento del conocimiento de una clave privada de otra instalaci\u00f3n, tambi\u00e9n conocido como Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, y CSCuu96601.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-200\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-310\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:content_security_management_virtual_appliance:8.4.0.0150:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A7CC2842-66AE-4738-BF49-F491B4E1EF7A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:content_security_management_virtual_appliance:9.0.0.087:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FE947E42-6952-49E4-9674-5C8E0900E3BD\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:8.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A560D3EA-57DF-48A9-B7A1-957C226C625B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F44102CA-6BE5-42AD-910B-3A0BA911FB53\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7C7E609D-0414-40AD-BD7D-D708C3B36986\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:9.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C699F035-7418-4344-8FDE-7C180176186D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:7.7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"ABB49075-4E5C-46F2-8436-0A7BA7161972\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"048F0725-C1B9-4D21-B7FE-2E81E72CFBD3\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C7837ACC-B42E-4099-BF9F-87523637C91A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"715190B6-9EBD-42DB-98B7-3FD410536F97\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E063B3C2-53CE-4732-8482-6A4B8EF0D02E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"675388FE-6B3D-4C90-BFB4-B997DDF47AB2\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150625-ironport\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39461\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75418\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032725\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032726\",\"source\":\"ykramarz@cisco.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150625-ironport\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39461\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75418\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032725\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032726\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.