gsd-2015-4217
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2015-4217", "description": "The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601.", "id": "GSD-2015-4217" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-4217" ], "details": "The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601.", "id": "GSD-2015-4217", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:59.510990Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "psirt@cisco.com", "ID": "CVE-2015-4217", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "20150625 Multiple Default SSH Keys Vulnerabilities in Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA", "refsource": "CISCO", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150625-ironport" }, { "name": "1032725", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032725" }, { "name": "20150625 Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA Default SSH Host Keys Vulnerability", "refsource": "CISCO", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39461" }, { "name": "1032726", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032726" }, { "name": "75418", "refsource": "BID", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75418" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:content_security_management_virtual_appliance:8.4.0.0150:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:content_security_management_virtual_appliance:9.0.0.087:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:9.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:8.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:7.7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "psirt@cisco.com", "ID": "CVE-2015-4217" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-310" }, { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-200" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "20150625 Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA Default SSH Host Keys Vulnerability", "refsource": "CISCO", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39461" }, { "name": "20150625 Multiple Default SSH Keys Vulnerabilities in Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA", "refsource": "CISCO", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150625-ironport" }, { "name": "75418", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75418" }, { "name": "1032726", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032726" }, { "name": "1032725", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032725" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.3, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2016-12-28T16:51Z", "publishedDate": "2015-06-26T10:59Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.