ghsa-rwpv-8h6r-wrrr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:14
Modified
2022-05-17 03:14
Details
The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-4217" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-06-26T10:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601.", "id": "GHSA-rwpv-8h6r-wrrr", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:14:13Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:14:13Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4217" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150625-ironport" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39461" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75418" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032725" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032726" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.