CVE-2026-9675 (GCVE-0-2026-9675)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-17 16:20 – Updated: 2026-06-17 17:29
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
undici WebSocket client vulnerable to denial of service via cumulative fragment bypass
Summary
Impact:
The undici WebSocket client enforces maxPayloadSize per-frame but does not enforce the cumulative size of fragmented uncompressed messages. A malicious WebSocket server can stream many small fragments that each pass per-frame validation but collectively exceed the configured limit, causing unbounded memory growth in the client process. The result is memory exhaustion and a denial of service.
Affected applications are those using the undici WebSocket client (new WebSocket(...)) that can be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised WebSocket endpoint.
This is a regression specific to undici 8.1.0. The 6.25.0 line shipped the equivalent cumulative check from the start and is unaffected. The 7.x line never had the maxPayloadSize feature and is also unaffected.
Patches:
Upgrade to undici >= 8.5.0.
Workarounds:
No workaround is available. The fix must be applied through an upgrade.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-06-17 17:29 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-9675",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-17T17:29:24.751635Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T17:29:42.926Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/undici",
"product": "undici",
"vendor": "undici",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.5.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "8.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "mauriceng98"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Str1ckl4nd"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "mcollina"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "UlisesGascon"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "lzhou1110"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Zyy0530"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Impact:\nThe undici WebSocket client enforces maxPayloadSize per-frame but does not enforce the cumulative size of fragmented uncompressed messages. A malicious WebSocket server can stream many small fragments that each pass per-frame validation but collectively exceed the configured limit, causing unbounded memory growth in the client process. The result is memory exhaustion and a denial of service.\n\nAffected applications are those using the undici WebSocket client (new WebSocket(...)) that can be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised WebSocket endpoint.\n\nThis is a regression specific to undici 8.1.0. The 6.25.0 line shipped the equivalent cumulative check from the start and is unaffected. The 7.x line never had the maxPayloadSize feature and is also unaffected.\n\nPatches:\nUpgrade to undici \u003e= 8.5.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\nNo workaround is available. The fix must be applied through an upgrade."
}
],
"value": "Impact:\nThe undici WebSocket client enforces maxPayloadSize per-frame but does not enforce the cumulative size of fragmented uncompressed messages. A malicious WebSocket server can stream many small fragments that each pass per-frame validation but collectively exceed the configured limit, causing unbounded memory growth in the client process. The result is memory exhaustion and a denial of service.\n\nAffected applications are those using the undici WebSocket client (new WebSocket(...)) that can be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised WebSocket endpoint.\n\nThis is a regression specific to undici 8.1.0. The 6.25.0 line shipped the equivalent cumulative check from the start and is unaffected. The 7.x line never had the maxPayloadSize feature and is also unaffected.\n\nPatches:\nUpgrade to undici \u003e= 8.5.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\nNo workaround is available. The fix must be applied through an upgrade."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T16:20:32.548Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-38rv-x7px-6hhq"
},
{
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
}
],
"title": "undici WebSocket client vulnerable to denial of service via cumulative fragment bypass",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-9675",
"datePublished": "2026-06-17T16:20:32.548Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-27T07:10:38.904Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T17:29:42.926Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-9675",
"date": "2026-09-15",
"epss": "0.00426",
"percentile": "0.36089"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-08-12T23:43:41.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2026-9675",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2026-9675",
"initial_release_date": "2026-06-27T01:07:22.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "1",
"product_status:known_affected": "1",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "undici WebSocket client vulnerable to denial of service via cumulative fragment bypass",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-9675.json",
"version": "3"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-9675\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"published\":\"2026-06-17T17:17:28.183\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-25T17:46:52.130\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Impact:\\nThe undici WebSocket client enforces maxPayloadSize per-frame but does not enforce the cumulative size of fragmented uncompressed messages. A malicious WebSocket server can stream many small fragments that each pass per-frame validation but collectively exceed the configured limit, causing unbounded memory growth in the client process. The result is memory exhaustion and a denial of service.\\n\\nAffected applications are those using the undici WebSocket client (new WebSocket(...)) that can be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised WebSocket endpoint.\\n\\nThis is a regression specific to undici 8.1.0. The 6.25.0 line shipped the equivalent cumulative check from the start and is unaffected. The 7.x line never had the maxPayloadSize feature and is also unaffected.\\n\\nPatches:\\nUpgrade to undici \u003e= 8.5.0.\\n\\nWorkarounds:\\nNo workaround is available. The fix must be applied through an upgrade.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"undici\",\"product\":\"undici\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"packageURL\":\"pkg:npm/undici\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"8.0.0\",\"lessThan\":\"8.5.0\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"8.5.0\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-06-17T17:29:24.751635Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-9675\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-400\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-770\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:undici:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"8.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"8.5.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"37F3655C-C7AE-4B13-A5EB-6FE0A9566124\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html\",\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-38rv-x7px-6hhq\",\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-24T13:48:00+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-9675",
"id": "CVE-2026-9675",
"initial_release_date": "2026-06-17T16:20:32.548000+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "16",
"product_status:known_affected": "1",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "69",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "undici: undici WebSocket client vulnerable to denial of service via cumulative fragment bypass",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-9675.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-9675\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-17T17:29:24.751635Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-17T17:29:28.032Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"undici WebSocket client vulnerable to denial of service via cumulative fragment bypass\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"mauriceng98\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Str1ckl4nd\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"mcollina\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation reviewer\", \"value\": \"UlisesGascon\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"lzhou1110\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Zyy0530\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"undici\", \"product\": \"undici\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"8.0.0\", \"lessThan\": \"8.5.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"8.5.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:npm/undici\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-38rv-x7px-6hhq\"}, {\"url\": \"https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cve-kit 1.0.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Impact:\\nThe undici WebSocket client enforces maxPayloadSize per-frame but does not enforce the cumulative size of fragmented uncompressed messages. A malicious WebSocket server can stream many small fragments that each pass per-frame validation but collectively exceed the configured limit, causing unbounded memory growth in the client process. The result is memory exhaustion and a denial of service.\\n\\nAffected applications are those using the undici WebSocket client (new WebSocket(...)) that can be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised WebSocket endpoint.\\n\\nThis is a regression specific to undici 8.1.0. The 6.25.0 line shipped the equivalent cumulative check from the start and is unaffected. The 7.x line never had the maxPayloadSize feature and is also unaffected.\\n\\nPatches:\\nUpgrade to undici \u003e= 8.5.0.\\n\\nWorkarounds:\\nNo workaround is available. The fix must be applied through an upgrade.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Impact:\\nThe undici WebSocket client enforces maxPayloadSize per-frame but does not enforce the cumulative size of fragmented uncompressed messages. A malicious WebSocket server can stream many small fragments that each pass per-frame validation but collectively exceed the configured limit, causing unbounded memory growth in the client process. The result is memory exhaustion and a denial of service.\\n\\nAffected applications are those using the undici WebSocket client (new WebSocket(...)) that can be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised WebSocket endpoint.\\n\\nThis is a regression specific to undici 8.1.0. The 6.25.0 line shipped the equivalent cumulative check from the start and is unaffected. The 7.x line never had the maxPayloadSize feature and is also unaffected.\\n\\nPatches:\\nUpgrade to undici \u003e= 8.5.0.\\n\\nWorkarounds:\\nNo workaround is available. The fix must be applied through an upgrade.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-400\", \"description\": \"CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-770\", \"description\": \"CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\", \"shortName\": \"openjs\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-17T16:20:32.548Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-9675\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-17T17:29:42.926Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-27T07:10:38.904Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-17T16:20:32.548Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"openjs\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…