CVE-2025-69418 (GCVE-0-2025-69418)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-27 16:01 – Updated: 2026-05-12 12:08
VLAI
Title
Unauthenticated/unencrypted trailing bytes with low-level OCB function calls
Summary
Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or<br>other hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple<br>of 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.<br><br>Impact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in<br>cleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,<br>allowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.<br><br>The low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated<br>stream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output<br>pointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original<br>base pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while<br>leaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum<br>also excludes the true tail bytes.<br><br>However, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the<br>higher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full<br>blocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding<br>the problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.<br>The vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level<br>CRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with<br>non-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.<br>For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.<br><br>The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected<br>by this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.<br><br>OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.<br><br>OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.
Severity
4 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
OpenSSL OpenSSL Affected: 3.6.0 , < 3.6.1 (semver)
Affected: 3.5.0 , < 3.5.5 (semver)
Affected: 3.4.0 , < 3.4.4 (semver)
Affected: 3.3.0 , < 3.3.6 (semver)
Affected: 3.0.0 , < 3.0.19 (semver)
Affected: 1.1.1 , < 1.1.1ze (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem Affected: 0 , < * (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-01-27 14:00
Credits
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research) Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "LOCAL",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 4,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-69418",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-01-29T15:06:43.617751Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-01-29T15:07:14.052Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
            "product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
            "vendor": "Siemens",
            "versions": [
              {
                "lessThan": "*",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "0",
                "versionType": "custom"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T12:08:40.794Z",
          "orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
          "shortName": "siemens-SADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
          }
        ],
        "x_adpType": "supplier"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.6.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.6.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.5.5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.4.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.4.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.3.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.3.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.0.19",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "1.1.1ze",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.1.1",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-01-27T14:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or\u003cbr\u003eother hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple\u003cbr\u003eof 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in\u003cbr\u003ecleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,\u003cbr\u003eallowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated\u003cbr\u003estream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output\u003cbr\u003epointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original\u003cbr\u003ebase pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while\u003cbr\u003eleaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum\u003cbr\u003ealso excludes the true tail bytes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the\u003cbr\u003ehigher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full\u003cbr\u003eblocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding\u003cbr\u003ethe problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level\u003cbr\u003eCRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with\u003cbr\u003enon-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.\u003cbr\u003eFor these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected\u003cbr\u003eby this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or\u003cbr\u003eother hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple\u003cbr\u003eof 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in\u003cbr\u003ecleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,\u003cbr\u003eallowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated\u003cbr\u003estream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output\u003cbr\u003epointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original\u003cbr\u003ebase pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while\u003cbr\u003eleaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum\u003cbr\u003ealso excludes the true tail bytes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the\u003cbr\u003ehigher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full\u003cbr\u003eblocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding\u003cbr\u003ethe problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level\u003cbr\u003eCRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with\u003cbr\u003enon-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.\u003cbr\u003eFor these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected\u003cbr\u003eby this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Low"
            },
            "type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-325",
              "description": "CWE-325 Missing Cryptographic Step",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-01-27T16:01:23.986Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.6.1 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ed40856d7d4ba6cb42779b6770666a65f19cb977"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.5.5 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4016975d4469cd6b94927c607f7c511385f928d8"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.4.4 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/372fc5c77529695b05b4f5b5187691a57ef5dffc"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.3.6 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7589230356d908c0eca4b969ec4f62106f4f5ae"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.0.19 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/52d23c86a54adab5ee9f80e48b242b52c4cc2347"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Unauthenticated/unencrypted trailing bytes with low-level OCB function calls",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-69418",
    "datePublished": "2026-01-27T16:01:23.986Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-06T12:44:09.945Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T12:08:40.794Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2025-69418",
      "date": "2026-08-10",
      "epss": "0.00115",
      "percentile": "0.01795"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-69418\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"published\":\"2026-01-27T16:16:33.253\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T10:00:39.647\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or\u003cbr\u003eother hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple\u003cbr\u003eof 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in\u003cbr\u003ecleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,\u003cbr\u003eallowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated\u003cbr\u003estream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output\u003cbr\u003epointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original\u003cbr\u003ebase pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while\u003cbr\u003eleaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum\u003cbr\u003ealso excludes the true tail bytes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the\u003cbr\u003ehigher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full\u003cbr\u003eblocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding\u003cbr\u003ethe problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level\u003cbr\u003eCRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with\u003cbr\u003enon-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.\u003cbr\u003eFor these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected\u003cbr\u003eby this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Resumen del problema: Al usar la API OCB de bajo nivel directamente con AES-NI u otras rutas de c\u00f3digo aceleradas por hardware, las entradas cuya longitud no es un m\u00faltiplo de 16 bytes pueden dejar el bloque parcial final sin cifrar y sin autenticar.\\nResumen del impacto: Los \u00faltimos 1-15 bytes de un mensaje pueden quedar expuestos en texto claro durante el cifrado y no est\u00e1n cubiertos por la etiqueta de autenticaci\u00f3n, lo que permite a un atacante leer o manipular esos bytes sin ser detectado. Las rutinas de cifrado y descifrado OCB de bajo nivel en la ruta de flujo acelerada por hardware procesan bloques completos de 16 bytes, pero no avanzan los punteros de entrada/salida. El c\u00f3digo posterior de manejo de la cola opera entonces sobre los punteros base originales, reprocesando efectivamente el inicio del b\u00fafer mientras deja los bytes finales reales sin procesar. La suma de verificaci\u00f3n de autenticaci\u00f3n tambi\u00e9n excluye los verdaderos bytes de la cola. Sin embargo, los consumidores t\u00edpicos de OpenSSL que usan EVP no se ven afectados porque las implementaciones OCB de EVP y del proveedor de nivel superior dividen las entradas de modo que los bloques completos y los bloques parciales finales se procesan en llamadas separadas, evitando la ruta de c\u00f3digo problem\u00e1tica. Adem\u00e1s, TLS no utiliza conjuntos de cifrado OCB. La vulnerabilidad solo afecta a las aplicaciones que llaman directamente a las funciones de bajo nivel CRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() o CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() con longitudes no alineadas a bloques en una sola llamada en compilaciones aceleradas por hardware. Por estas razones, el problema se evalu\u00f3 como de baja severidad. Los m\u00f3dulos FIPS en 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 y 3.0 no se ven afectados por este problema, ya que el modo OCB no es un algoritmo aprobado por FIPS. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 y 1.1.1 son vulnerables a este problema. OpenSSL 1.0.2 no se ve afectado por este problema.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"OpenSSL\",\"product\":\"OpenSSL\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"3.6.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.6.1\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.5.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.5.5\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.4.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.4.4\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.3.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.3.6\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.0.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.0.19\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"1.1.1\",\"lessThan\":\"1.1.1ze\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]},{\"source\":\"0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Siemens\",\"product\":\"SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unknown\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"*\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.4,\"impactScore\":2.5}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-01-29T15:06:43.617751Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2025-69418\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-325\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.1.1\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.1.1ze\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E000B986-6A31-468F-9EA3-B9D16DB16FB2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.0.19\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C76C5F55-5243-4461-82F5-2FEBFF4D59FA\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.3.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.3.6\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F5292E9E-6B50-409F-9219-7B0A04047AD8\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.4.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.4.4\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B9D3DCAE-317D-4DFB-93F0-7A235A229619\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.5.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.5.5\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1CAC7CBE-EC03-4089-938A-0CEEB2E09B62\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.6.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.6.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"68352537-5E99-4F4D-B78A-BCF0353A70A5\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/372fc5c77529695b05b4f5b5187691a57ef5dffc\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4016975d4469cd6b94927c607f7c511385f928d8\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/52d23c86a54adab5ee9f80e48b242b52c4cc2347\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7589230356d908c0eca4b969ec4f62106f4f5ae\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ed40856d7d4ba6cb42779b6770666a65f19cb977\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html\",\"source\":\"0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e\"}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Low",
      "current_release_date": "2026-08-09T19:06:15+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2025-69418",
      "id": "CVE-2025-69418",
      "initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "107",
      "product_status:known_affected": "58",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "5",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "openssl: OpenSSL: Information disclosure and data tampering via specific low-level OCB encryption/decryption calls",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-69418.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-08-01T23:28:48Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2025-69418",
      "id": "CVE-2025-69418",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-01-30T00:27:16Z",
      "product_status:known_affected": "406",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "250",
      "product_status:recommended": "329",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2025-69418",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2025-69418.json",
      "version": "28"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4, \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-69418\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-01-29T15:06:43.617751Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-29T15:07:09.532Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Unauthenticated/unencrypted trailing bytes with low-level OCB function calls\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/\", \"content\": {\"text\": \"Low\"}}, \"format\": \"other\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"OpenSSL\", \"product\": \"OpenSSL\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.6.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.6.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.5.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.5.5\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.4.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.4.4\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.3.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.3.6\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.0.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.0.19\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.1.1\", \"lessThan\": \"1.1.1ze\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-01-27T14:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt\", \"name\": \"OpenSSL Advisory\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ed40856d7d4ba6cb42779b6770666a65f19cb977\", \"name\": \"3.6.1 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4016975d4469cd6b94927c607f7c511385f928d8\", \"name\": \"3.5.5 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/372fc5c77529695b05b4f5b5187691a57ef5dffc\", \"name\": \"3.4.4 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7589230356d908c0eca4b969ec4f62106f4f5ae\", \"name\": \"3.3.6 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/52d23c86a54adab5ee9f80e48b242b52c4cc2347\", \"name\": \"3.0.19 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or\u003cbr\u003eother hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple\u003cbr\u003eof 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in\u003cbr\u003ecleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,\u003cbr\u003eallowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated\u003cbr\u003estream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output\u003cbr\u003epointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original\u003cbr\u003ebase pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while\u003cbr\u003eleaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum\u003cbr\u003ealso excludes the true tail bytes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the\u003cbr\u003ehigher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full\u003cbr\u003eblocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding\u003cbr\u003ethe problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level\u003cbr\u003eCRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with\u003cbr\u003enon-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.\u003cbr\u003eFor these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected\u003cbr\u003eby this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or\u003cbr\u003eother hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple\u003cbr\u003eof 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in\u003cbr\u003ecleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,\u003cbr\u003eallowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated\u003cbr\u003estream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output\u003cbr\u003epointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original\u003cbr\u003ebase pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while\u003cbr\u003eleaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum\u003cbr\u003ealso excludes the true tail bytes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the\u003cbr\u003ehigher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full\u003cbr\u003eblocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding\u003cbr\u003ethe problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level\u003cbr\u003eCRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with\u003cbr\u003enon-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.\u003cbr\u003eFor these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected\u003cbr\u003eby this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-325\", \"description\": \"CWE-325 Missing Cryptographic Step\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"shortName\": \"openssl\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-27T16:01:23.986Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-69418\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-29T15:07:14.052Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-01-06T12:44:09.945Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-27T16:01:23.986Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"openssl\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.