Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-78
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
9703 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GCVE-1337-2026-000000000… (CVE-2026-4946)
Vulnerability from gna-1337 – Published: 2026-03-29 19:35 – Updated: 2026-03-29 19:35
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
NSA Ghidra Auto-Analysis Annotation Command Execution
Summary
Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CNA · AHA (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://takeonme.org/gcves/GCVE-1337-2026-0000000… | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra/… | vendor-advisory |
Date Public
2026-03-29 18:37
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Ghidra",
"vendor": "NSA",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "12.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Mobasi Security Team"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "todb of AHA!"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-29T18:37:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst\u2019s machine."
}
],
"value": "Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst\u2019s machine."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CNA",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-29T19:35:30.692Z",
"orgId": "26969f82-7e87-44d8-9cb5-f6fb926ddd43",
"shortName": "AHA"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://takeonme.org/gcves/GCVE-1337-2026-00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001011111111111000111111110000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000110"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra/security/advisories/GHSA-mc3p-mq2p-xw6v"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "NSA Ghidra Auto-Analysis Annotation Command Execution",
"x_gcve": [
{
"recordType": "advisory",
"vulnId": "gcve-1337-2026-00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001011111111111000111111110000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000110"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "26969f82-7e87-44d8-9cb5-f6fb926ddd43",
"assignerShortName": "AHA",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-4946",
"datePublished": "2026-03-29T19:35:30.692Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-27T02:17:29.992Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-29T19:35:30.692Z",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"vulnId": "GCVE-1337-2026-00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001011111111111000111111110000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000110"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-109318 (GCVE-0-2026-109318)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 16:05 – Updated: 2026-10-12 16:05
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Grav Git Sync 1.0.2 through 3.4.12 Command Injection via Commit Author
Summary
Grav Git Sync 1.0.2 through 3.4.12 contains a command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated content editors to execute OS commands by injecting shell substitutions into profile fields. When the gravuser or gravfull author mode is enabled, attackers can set a malicious username, full name, or email that reaches PHP exec() via git commit --author, running commands as the web-server account.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/getgrav/grav/security/advisori… | vendor-advisorythird-party-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/grav-git-syn… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| trilbymedia | grav-plugin-git-sync |
Affected:
1.0.2 , < 3.4.13
(semver)
Unaffected: 3.4.13 (semver) |
Date Public
2026-09-23 00:00
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "grav-plugin-git-sync",
"repo": "https://github.com/trilbymedia/grav-plugin-git-sync",
"vendor": "trilbymedia",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.4.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "3.4.13",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "AlpetGexha"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Grav Git Sync 1.0.2 through 3.4.12 contains a command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated content editors to execute OS commands by injecting shell substitutions into profile fields. When the gravuser or gravfull author mode is enabled, attackers can set a malicious username, full name, or email that reaches PHP exec() via git commit --author, running commands as the web-server account."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T16:05:11.496Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-c89w-55m3-fmf7)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/getgrav/grav/security/advisories/GHSA-c89w-55m3-fmf7"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Grav Git Sync 1.0.2 through 3.4.12 Command Injection via Commit Author",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/grav-git-sync-1.0.2-through-3.4.12-command-injection-via-commit-author"
}
],
"title": "Grav Git Sync 1.0.2 through 3.4.12 Command Injection via Commit Author",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-109318",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T16:05:11.496Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-12T14:15:29.011Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T16:05:11.496Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-108953 (GCVE-0-2026-108953)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 12:13 – Updated: 2026-10-12 12:13
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
mac-shell-mcp before 2.0.0 OS Command Injection via execute_command Arguments
Summary
mac-shell-mcp before 2.0.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows MCP clients to bypass the command whitelist by injecting shell metacharacters into execute_command arguments. Attackers or malicious prompts can call a safe command such as pwd with arguments like ';' to run forbidden commands as the server user without approval.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/cfdude/mac-shell-mcp/issues/45 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/cfdude/mac-shell-mcp/commit/93… | patch |
| https://github.com/cfdude/mac-shell-mcp/blob/1c17… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/cfdude/mac-shell-mcp | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mac-shell-mc… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cfdude | mac-shell-mcp |
Affected:
0 , < 2.0.0
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-10-04 00:00
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "mac-shell-mcp",
"vendor": "cfdude",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Bandana (HackWitHer), APIsec Research Labs"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "mac-shell-mcp before 2.0.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows MCP clients to bypass the command whitelist by injecting shell metacharacters into execute_command arguments. Attackers or malicious prompts can call a safe command such as pwd with arguments like \u0027;\u0027 to run forbidden commands as the server user without approval."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T12:13:05.422Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cfdude/mac-shell-mcp/issues/45"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cfdude/mac-shell-mcp/commit/932ce733cde07bb30b1f186303e6692dbb5d087a"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cfdude/mac-shell-mcp/blob/1c1708201abb7a18c83075e1bf933e7a92cbeb9f/src/services/command-service.ts#L257-L340"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cfdude/mac-shell-mcp"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: mac-shell-mcp before 2.0.0 OS Command Injection via execute_command Arguments",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mac-shell-mcp-before-2.0.0-os-command-injection-via-execute-command-arguments"
}
],
"title": "mac-shell-mcp before 2.0.0 OS Command Injection via execute_command Arguments",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108953",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T12:13:05.422Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-11T19:04:35.850Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T12:13:05.422Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-108896 (GCVE-0-2026-108896)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 14:30 – Updated: 2026-10-12 14:30
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Linksys E1700 setLinksysIpv6 os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003. This affects the function setLinksysIpv6 of the file /goform/setLinksysIpv6. The manipulation of the argument _6rd_prefix/_6rd_prefix_len results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
9.9 (Critical)
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416683 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416683/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108896 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/973115 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Link… | broken-linkexploit |
| https://www.linksys.com/ | product |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:linksys:e1700_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "E1700",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0.4.003"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "pjqwudi (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was found in Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003. This affects the function setLinksysIpv6 of the file /goform/setLinksysIpv6. The manipulation of the argument _6rd_prefix/_6rd_prefix_len results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 9,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T14:30:14.340Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-416683 | Linksys E1700 setLinksysIpv6 os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416683"
},
{
"name": "VDB-416683 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416683/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-108896 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108896"
},
{
"name": "Submit #973115 | Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/973115"
},
{
"tags": [
"broken-link",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Linksys3/vuln_70/70.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.linksys.com/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T16:27:52.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Linksys E1700 setLinksysIpv6 os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108896",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T14:30:14.340Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-11T14:22:22.662Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T14:30:14.340Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-108895 (GCVE-0-2026-108895)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 14:15 – Updated: 2026-10-12 14:15
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Linksys E1700 setDMZ os command injection
Summary
A weakness has been identified in Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003. The affected element is the function setDMZ of the file /goform/setDMZ. Executing a manipulation of the argument MAC_addr can lead to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
9.9 (Critical)
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416687 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416687/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108895 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/973114 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Link… | exploit |
| https://www.linksys.com/ | product |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:linksys:e1700_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "E1700",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0.4.003"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "pjqwudi (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A weakness has been identified in Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003. The affected element is the function setDMZ of the file /goform/setDMZ. Executing a manipulation of the argument MAC_addr can lead to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 9,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T14:15:10.292Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-416687 | Linksys E1700 setDMZ os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416687"
},
{
"name": "VDB-416687 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416687/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-108895 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108895"
},
{
"name": "Submit #973114 | Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/973114"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Linksys3/vuln_69/69.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.linksys.com/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T16:28:09.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Linksys E1700 setDMZ os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108895",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T14:15:10.292Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-11T14:22:18.925Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T14:15:10.292Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-108894 (GCVE-0-2026-108894)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 14:00 – Updated: 2026-10-12 14:00
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Linksys E1700 Static Route addStaticRoute os command injection
Summary
A security flaw has been discovered in Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003. Impacted is the function addStaticRoute of the file /goform/addStaticRoute of the component Static Route Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument staticRoute_IP_setting/staticRoute_Netmask_setting/staticRoute_Gateway_setting/staticRoute_Metric_setting results in os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
9.9 (Critical)
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416686 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416686/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108894 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/973113 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Link… | exploit |
| https://www.linksys.com/ | product |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:linksys:e1700_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Static Route Handler"
],
"product": "E1700",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0.4.003"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "pjqwudi (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A security flaw has been discovered in Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003. Impacted is the function addStaticRoute of the file /goform/addStaticRoute of the component Static Route Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument staticRoute_IP_setting/staticRoute_Netmask_setting/staticRoute_Gateway_setting/staticRoute_Metric_setting results in os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 9,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T14:00:15.516Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-416686 | Linksys E1700 Static Route addStaticRoute os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416686"
},
{
"name": "VDB-416686 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416686/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-108894 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108894"
},
{
"name": "Submit #973113 | Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/973113"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Linksys3/vuln_68/68.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.linksys.com/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T16:28:06.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Linksys E1700 Static Route addStaticRoute os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108894",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T14:00:15.516Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-11T14:22:15.579Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T14:00:15.516Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-108817 (GCVE-0-2026-108817)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 08:45 – Updated: 2026-10-12 08:45 X_Open Source
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
agno-agi agno CodingTools coding.py agno.CodingTools.run_shell os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was determined in agno-agi agno up to 3.0.9. Affected by this issue is the function agno.CodingTools.run_shell in the library libs/agno/agno/tools/coding.py of the component CodingTools. This manipulation of the argument command causes os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 3.0.10 can resolve this issue. Patch name: ed64fab5be63d2b15faddc2ef7c733176daa14aa. You should upgrade the affected component.
Severity
Assigner
References
11 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416594 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416594/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108817 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/964160 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/964161 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/Agno-agi/Agno/issues/10048 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/pull/10210 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/ybyu-ieu/agno-security-advisor… | exploit |
| https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/commit/ed64fab5b… | patch |
| https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/releases/tag/v3.0.10 | patch |
| https://github.com/Agno-agi/Agno/ | product |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:agno-agi:agno:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"CodingTools"
],
"product": "agno",
"vendor": "agno-agi",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.9"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "3.0.10"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Ybyu (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was determined in agno-agi agno up to 3.0.9. Affected by this issue is the function agno.CodingTools.run_shell in the library libs/agno/agno/tools/coding.py of the component CodingTools. This manipulation of the argument command causes os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 3.0.10 can resolve this issue. Patch name: ed64fab5be63d2b15faddc2ef7c733176daa14aa. You should upgrade the affected component."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T08:45:20.909Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-416594 | agno-agi agno CodingTools coding.py agno.CodingTools.run_shell os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416594"
},
{
"name": "VDB-416594 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416594/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-108817 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108817"
},
{
"name": "Submit #964160 | Agno AGI Agno 2.7.3 CWE-78 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/964160"
},
{
"name": "Submit #964161 | Agno AGI Agno 2.7.3 CWE-88 Argument Injection (Duplicate)",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/964161"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Agno-agi/Agno/issues/10048"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/pull/10210"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ybyu-ieu/agno-security-advisories/blob/main/advisories/agno-codingtools-run-shell-disallowlist-bypass-command-execution.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/commit/ed64fab5be63d2b15faddc2ef7c733176daa14aa"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/agno-agi/agno/releases/tag/v3.0.10"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Agno-agi/Agno/"
}
],
"tags": [
"x_open-source"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T12:46:37.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "agno-agi agno CodingTools coding.py agno.CodingTools.run_shell os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108817",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T08:45:20.909Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-11T10:41:29.061Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T08:45:20.909Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-108804 (GCVE-0-2026-108804)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 05:30 – Updated: 2026-10-12 05:30 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
TRENDnet TEW-751DR/TEW-752DRU/TEW733GR Web Management Backend pigwidgeon.cgi fwrite os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was detected in TRENDnet TEW-751DR, TEW-752DRU and TEW733GR 1.03B01/1.03B03. Affected is the function fwrite of the file pigwidgeon.cgi of the component Web Management Backend. The manipulation of the argument service results in os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor confirms: "As this router was EOL'd in 2011, we have no way of testing if such vulnerability exists. We will notify our customers of a potential vulnerability on this product." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Severity
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416581 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416581/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108804 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/962770 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/dacj4n/TRENDNetExploits | exploit |
| https://github.com/dacj4n/TRENDNetExploits/tree/m… | exploit |
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRENDnet | TEW-751DR |
Affected:
1.03B01
Affected: 1.03B03 cpe:2.3:a:trendnet:tew-751dr:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| TRENDnet | TEW-752DRU |
Affected:
1.03B01
Affected: 1.03B03 cpe:2.3:a:trendnet:tew-752dru:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| TRENDnet | TEW733GR |
Affected:
1.03B01
Affected: 1.03B03 cpe:2.3:a:trendnet:tew733gr:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:trendnet:tew-751dr:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Web Management Backend"
],
"product": "TEW-751DR",
"vendor": "TRENDnet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.03B01"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.03B03"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:trendnet:tew-752dru:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Web Management Backend"
],
"product": "TEW-752DRU",
"vendor": "TRENDnet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.03B01"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.03B03"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:trendnet:tew733gr:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Web Management Backend"
],
"product": "TEW733GR",
"vendor": "TRENDnet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.03B01"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.03B03"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "dacjun (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was detected in TRENDnet TEW-751DR, TEW-752DRU and TEW733GR 1.03B01/1.03B03. Affected is the function fwrite of the file pigwidgeon.cgi of the component Web Management Backend. The manipulation of the argument service results in os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor confirms: \"As this router was EOL\u0027d in 2011, we have no way of testing if such vulnerability exists. We will notify our customers of a potential vulnerability on this product.\" This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T05:30:17.425Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-416581 | TRENDnet TEW-751DR/TEW-752DRU/TEW733GR Web Management Backend pigwidgeon.cgi fwrite os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416581"
},
{
"name": "VDB-416581 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416581/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-108804 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108804"
},
{
"name": "Submit #962770 | TRENDnet TEW-751DR, TEW-752DRU, TEW733GR TEW-751DR v1.03B03, TEW-752DRU v1.03B01, TEW733GR v1.03B01 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/962770"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/dacj4n/TRENDNetExploits"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/dacj4n/TRENDNetExploits/tree/main/exploit"
}
],
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-11T11:46:18.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "TRENDnet TEW-751DR/TEW-752DRU/TEW733GR Web Management Backend pigwidgeon.cgi fwrite os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108804",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T05:30:17.425Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-11T09:41:13.126Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T05:30:17.425Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-108744 (GCVE-0-2026-108744)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-11 12:19 – Updated: 2026-10-11 12:19
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
pbi-cli 3.10.1 through 3.12.0 OS Command Injection via Desktop Sync
Summary
pbi-cli 3.10.1 through 3.12.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in desktop_sync.py that passes unquoted .pbip paths to cmd /c start when reopening projects. Attackers can lure victims into opening a Power BI project from a space-free path containing & to run commands with victim privileges during report write or reload.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://hackmd.io/@haind/pbi-cli-desktop-sync-pbi… | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/MinaSaad1/pbi-cli/blob/c8655cb… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/MinaSaad1/pbi-cli/blob/c8655cb… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/MinaSaad1/pbi-cli | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/pbi-cli-3.10… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-10-10 00:00
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/pbi-cli-tool",
"product": "pbi-cli",
"repo": "https://github.com/MinaSaad1/pbi-cli",
"vendor": "MinaSaad1",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.12.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.10.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "HaiND from the Post and Telecommunication Institute of Technology"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "pbi-cli 3.10.1 through 3.12.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in desktop_sync.py that passes unquoted .pbip paths to cmd /c start when reopening projects. Attackers can lure victims into opening a Power BI project from a space-free path containing \u0026 to run commands with victim privileges during report write or reload."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-11T12:19:46.798Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/@haind/pbi-cli-desktop-sync-pbip-cmd-argument-injection"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MinaSaad1/pbi-cli/blob/c8655cb9a131e2ce87ae5e1380994099f693d6af/src/pbi_cli/utils/desktop_sync.py#L398-L405"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MinaSaad1/pbi-cli/blob/c8655cb9a131e2ce87ae5e1380994099f693d6af/src/pbi_cli/utils/desktop_sync.py#L286-L291"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MinaSaad1/pbi-cli"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: pbi-cli 3.10.1 through 3.12.0 OS Command Injection via Desktop Sync",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/pbi-cli-3.10.1-through-3.12.0-os-command-injection-via-desktop-sync"
}
],
"title": "pbi-cli 3.10.1 through 3.12.0 OS Command Injection via Desktop Sync",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108744",
"datePublished": "2026-10-11T12:19:46.798Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-11T01:53:19.833Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-11T12:19:46.798Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-108576 (GCVE-0-2026-108576)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-11 12:15 – Updated: 2026-10-11 12:15
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
TOZED X300 IPPingDiagnostics process_ping os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was found in TOZED X300 up to 6.01.3. This vulnerability affects the function process_ping of the component IPPingDiagnostics Handler. The manipulation of the argument Host results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416233 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/416233/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108576 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/956290 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/danish1162/CVE-2026-2035703-x3… | related |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:tozed:x300:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"IPPingDiagnostics Handler"
],
"product": "X300",
"vendor": "TOZED",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.01.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.01.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.01.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.01.3"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "danish1162 (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was found in TOZED X300 up to 6.01.3. This vulnerability affects the function process_ping of the component IPPingDiagnostics Handler. The manipulation of the argument Host results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:ND/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-11T12:15:13.822Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-416233 | TOZED X300 IPPingDiagnostics process_ping os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416233"
},
{
"name": "VDB-416233 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/416233/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-108576 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108576"
},
{
"name": "Submit #956290 | Tozed Kangwei ZLT X300 6.01.3 Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/956290"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danish1162/CVE-2026-2035703-x300/security/advisories/GHSA-qcpp-vfr2-v242"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-10T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-10T17:47:19.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "TOZED X300 IPPingDiagnostics process_ping os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108576",
"datePublished": "2026-10-11T12:15:13.822Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-10T15:41:51.290Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-11T12:15:13.822Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-4.3
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation MIT-28
Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Implementation
If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation MIT-27
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation MIT-29
Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation
Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.