CWE-295
Weakness AllowedImproper Certificate Validation
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
When the product uses certificate pinning, the developer might not properly validate all relevant components of the certificate before pinning the certificate. This can make it difficult or expensive to test after the pinning is complete.
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Bytecode Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis
Binary Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Web Application Scanner
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Man-in-the-middle attack tool
Effectiveness: High
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Effectiveness: High
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Source code Weakness Analyzer
Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
Effectiveness: High
Content history
Submitted by members of the CWE community to extend early CWE versions
Suggested OWASP Top Ten 2004 mapping
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Background_Details, Description
updated Related_Attack_Patterns
Converted from category to weakness class.
updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Description, Name, Observed_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction, Type
updated Observed_Examples
updated Detection_Factors
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
updated Background_Details, Modes_of_Introduction, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Related_Attack_Patterns
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Observed_Examples, References
updated Description, Modes_of_Introduction
updated Relationships
updated Mapping_Notes
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Detection_Factors, Diagram, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Observed_Examples
updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
2474 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-122318 (GCVE-0-2026-122318)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-05 02:25 – Updated: 2026-11-05 02:25- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/kyverno/kyverno/security/advis… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/kyverno-befo… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:golang/github.com/kyverno/kyverno",
"product": "kyverno",
"vendor": "kyverno",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.19.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.19.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:kyverno:kyverno:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.19.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "arpitjain099"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Kyverno before 1.19.2 contains an authentication bypass in matchCertificateData that skips verifyImages subject and subjectRegExp checks when the signing certificate has no Subject Alternative Name. Attackers holding a leaf certificate from a configured private trust root can omit the SAN, set the expected Fulcio issuer OID, and sign malicious images that are admitted despite signer pinning."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:L/SI:H/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T02:25:17.874Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-fcfr-fr8g-qjqv)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kyverno/kyverno/security/advisories/GHSA-fcfr-fr8g-qjqv"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Kyverno before 1.19.2 Cosign Identity Check Bypass via Empty SAN Certificates",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/kyverno-before-1.19.2-cosign-identity-check-bypass-via-empty-san-certificates"
}
],
"title": "Kyverno before 1.19.2 Cosign Identity Check Bypass via Empty SAN Certificates",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-122318",
"datePublished": "2026-11-05T02:25:17.874Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-11-04T23:25:07.316Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T02:25:17.874Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-121638 (GCVE-0-2026-121638)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-04 14:44 – Updated: 2026-11-04 18:20| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://psirt.watchguard.com/CVE-2026-121638 | vendor-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WatchGuard | AuthPoint Authentication Gateway |
Affected:
1.0 , < 7.6.0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:watchguard:authpoint_authentication_gateway:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-121638",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-04T16:38:45.464042Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-04T18:20:22.305Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "AuthPoint Authentication Gateway",
"vendor": "WatchGuard",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.6.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThis vulnerability affects AuthPoint Gateway deployments configured with a RADIUS, LDAP or ADFS resource.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "This vulnerability affects AuthPoint Gateway deployments configured with a RADIUS, LDAP or ADFS resource."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:watchguard:authpoint_authentication_gateway:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.6.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "WatchGuard AI Security Research"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in WatchGuard AuthPoint Gateway allows an attacker with an on-path network position to intercept and modify communications between the AuthPoint Gateway and local authentication providers."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "WatchGuard is not aware of any exploitation of this vulnerability in the wild."
}
],
"value": "WatchGuard is not aware of any exploitation of this vulnerability in the wild."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-04T14:44:14.541Z",
"orgId": "5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3",
"shortName": "WatchGuard"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://psirt.watchguard.com/CVE-2026-121638"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "AuthPoint Authentication Gateway 7.6.0"
}
],
"value": "AuthPoint Authentication Gateway 7.6.0"
}
],
"title": "WatchGuard AuthPoint Gateway Improper Certificate Validation Allows Man-in-the-Middle Attacks"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3",
"assignerShortName": "WatchGuard",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-121638",
"datePublished": "2026-11-04T14:44:14.541Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-11-03T17:27:06.115Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-04T18:20:22.305Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-121624 (GCVE-0-2026-121624)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-03 17:13 – Updated: 2026-11-03 22:41- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://pusi77.eu.org/blog/2026-11-03-supremo-tls-cve | technical-description |
| https://www.supremocontrol.com/changelog/ | release-notes |
| https://www.supremocontrol.com/ | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nanosystems-… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanosystems | Supremo |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.2.3874
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-121624",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-03T22:36:34.514075Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T22:41:14.021Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Supremo",
"vendor": "Nanosystems",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.2.3874",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Andrea Pusineri"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-11-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Nanosystems Supremo for Windows and macOS before 5.0.2.3874 contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability that allows adjacent attackers to intercept TLS connections by presenting untrusted certificates. Attackers on the same network can terminate and relay the client\u0027s TLS session using self-signed certificates to read usernames, SHA-256 password hashes, and license codes."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 7.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T17:13:52.053Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://pusi77.eu.org/blog/2026-11-03-supremo-tls-cve"
},
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://www.supremocontrol.com/changelog/"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.supremocontrol.com/"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Nanosystems Supremo before 5.0.2.3874 Improper TLS Certificate Validation",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nanosystems-supremo-before-5.0.2.3874-improper-tls-certificate-validation"
}
],
"title": "Nanosystems Supremo before 5.0.2.3874 Improper TLS Certificate Validation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-121624",
"datePublished": "2026-11-03T17:13:52.053Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-11-03T16:57:36.800Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T22:41:14.021Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-121565 (GCVE-0-2026-121565)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-03 22:17 – Updated: 2026-11-06 19:26- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanium | TanOS |
Affected:
1.8.5 , < 1.8.5.0326
(custom)
Affected: 1.8.6 , < 1.8.6.0193 (custom) Affected: 1.9.0 , < 1.9.0.0089 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Asset |
Affected:
1.33 , < 1.33.334
(custom)
Affected: 1.36 , < 1.36.182 (custom) Affected: 1.39 , < 1.39.164 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Comply |
Affected:
2.32 , < 2.32.275
(custom)
Affected: 2.35 , < 2.35.337 (custom) Affected: 2.37 , < 2.37.347 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Connect |
Affected:
5.29 , < 5.29.272
(custom)
Affected: 5.37 , < 5.37.177 (custom) Affected: 5.47 , < 5.47.135 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Integrity Monitor |
Affected:
3.6 , < 3.6.608
(custom)
Affected: 3.7 , < 3.7.383 (custom) Affected: 3.8 , < 3.8.362 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Health Check |
Affected:
1.13 , < 1.13.653
(custom)
|
|
| Tanium | Endpoint Configuration Toolset Solution |
Affected:
1.51 , < 1.51.61
(custom)
Affected: 1.59 , < 1.59.51 (custom) Affected: 1.71 , < 1.71.26 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Patch |
Affected:
3.24 , < 3.24.328
(custom)
Affected: 3.28 , < 3.28.346 (custom) Affected: 3.32 , < 3.32.383 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Performance |
Affected:
1.25 , < 1.25.196
(custom)
|
|
| Tanium | Reputation |
Affected:
6.6 , < 6.6.150
(custom)
Affected: 6.7 , < 6.7.143 (custom) Affected: 6.8 , < 6.8.167 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Reveal |
Affected:
2.4 , < 2.4.109
(custom)
Affected: 2.5 , < 2.5.166 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Threat Response |
Affected:
4.9 , < 4.9.480
(custom)
Affected: 4.12 , < 4.12.353 (custom) Affected: 4.17 , < 4.17.333 (custom) |
|
| Tanium | Provision Host |
Affected:
10.4.100 , < 10.4.100
(semver)
Affected: 10.8.115 , < 10.8.115 (semver) Affected: 10.9.113 , < 10.9.113 (semver) Affected: 10.10.189 , < 10.10.189 (semver) Affected: 10.11.127 , < 10.11.127 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-121565",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-06T19:26:46.759376Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-06T19:26:57.322Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "TanOS",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.8.5.0326",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.8.5",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.8.6.0193",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.8.6",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.9.0.0089",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.9.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Asset",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.33.334",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.33",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.36.182",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.36",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.39.164",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.39",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Comply",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.32.275",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.32",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.35.337",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.35",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.37.347",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.37",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Connect",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.29.272",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.29",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.37.177",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.37",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.47.135",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.47",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Integrity Monitor",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.6.608",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.6",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.7.383",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.7",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.8.362",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.8",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Health Check",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.13.653",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.13",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Endpoint Configuration Toolset Solution",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.51.61",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.51",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.59.51",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.59",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.71.26",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.71",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Patch",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.24.328",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.24",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.28.346",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.28",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.32.383",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.32",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Performance",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.196",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.25",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Reputation",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.6.150",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.6",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.7.143",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.8.167",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.8",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Reveal",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.4.109",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.4",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.5.166",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Threat Response",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.9.480",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.9",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.12.353",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.12",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.17.333",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.17",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Provision Host",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.4.100",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.4.100",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.8.115",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.8.115",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.9.113",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.9.113",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.10.189",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.10.189",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.11.127",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.11.127",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"dateAssigned": "2026-11-03T14:58:46.819Z",
"datePublic": "2026-11-03T22:12:11.458Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Tanium addressed an improper certificate validation vulnerability in multiple products. Products have been updated to distrust several intermediate CA certificates associated with compromised private keys."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-04T11:24:05.622Z",
"orgId": "3938794e-25f5-4123-a1ba-5cbd7f104512",
"shortName": "Tanium"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "TAN-2026-092",
"url": "https://security.tanium.com/TAN-2026-092"
}
],
"title": "Tanium addressed an improper certificate validation vulnerability in multiple products"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3938794e-25f5-4123-a1ba-5cbd7f104512",
"assignerShortName": "Tanium",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-121565",
"datePublished": "2026-11-03T22:17:22.997Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-11-03T14:58:47.328Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-06T19:26:57.322Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-121452 (GCVE-0-2026-121452)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-03 15:17 – Updated: 2026-11-03 18:28- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/mlogclub/bbs-go/issues/310 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/mlogclub/bbs-go | product |
| https://github.com/mlogclub/bbs-go/commit/1a06e35… | patch |
| https://github.com/mlogclub/bbs-go/blob/v4.4.6/in… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/bbs-go-throu… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-121452",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-03T17:21:23.781193Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T18:28:15.865Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:golang/bbs-go",
"product": "bbs-go",
"vendor": "mlogclub",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.4.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bbs-go_project:bbs-go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "4.4.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "George Chen"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "bbs-go through 4.4.6 contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability that allows network-positioned attackers to intercept SMTP traffic because sendEmail() sets InsecureSkipVerify to true. Attackers can present any certificate to capture SMTP PLAIN auth credentials and read or modify outgoing password-reset and verification emails."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T15:17:01.813Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #310",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mlogclub/bbs-go/issues/310"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mlogclub/bbs-go"
},
{
"name": "Fix commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mlogclub/bbs-go/commit/1a06e35fa6314ee2d3ada70685a7afa740baf6f5"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mlogclub/bbs-go/blob/v4.4.6/internal/services/email_service.go#L86-L113"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: bbs-go through 4.4.6 Improper TLS Certificate Validation in SMTP Email Service",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/bbs-go-through-4.4.6-improper-tls-certificate-validation-in-smtp-email-service"
}
],
"title": "bbs-go through 4.4.6 Improper TLS Certificate Validation in SMTP Email Service",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-121452",
"datePublished": "2026-11-03T15:17:01.813Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-11-03T12:33:53.717Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T18:28:15.865Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-121392 (GCVE-0-2026-121392)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-03 14:27 – Updated: 2026-11-03 18:31- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advis… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-befo… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-121392",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-03T17:48:51.108013Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T18:31:19.966Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FreeRDP",
"vendor": "FreeRDP",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.32.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "3.32.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:freerdp:freerdp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.32.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability in tls_verify_certificate() that accepts Common Name fallback despite non-matching SAN entries and matches IP literals against DNS strings. Man-in-the-middle attackers holding a certificate from a client-trusted CA can bypass server identity checks to intercept RDP sessions, including keystrokes, clipboard, and screen content."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T14:27:57.885Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-jq25-3374-4262)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-jq25-3374-4262"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: FreeRDP before 3.32.2 Certificate Identity Validation Bypass via tls_verify_certificate",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-3.32.2-certificate-identity-validation-bypass-via-tls-verify-certificate"
}
],
"title": "FreeRDP before 3.32.2 Certificate Identity Validation Bypass via tls_verify_certificate",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-121392",
"datePublished": "2026-11-03T14:27:57.885Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-11-03T12:26:31.384Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T18:31:19.966Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-121147 (GCVE-0-2026-121147)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-04 12:43 – Updated: 2026-11-05 19:07- CWE-295 - Improper certificate validation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.cert-in.org.in/s2cMainServlet?pageid=… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tata Motors | Tata Motors iRA 2.0 |
Affected:
versions 26.7.3 and below
cpe:2.3:a:tata_motors:tata_motors_ira_2.0:versions_26.7.3_and_below:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Tata Motors | Tata Motors iRA.ev |
Affected:
versions 26.7.2 and below
cpe:2.3:a:tata_motors:tata_motors_ira.ev:versions_26.7.2_and_below:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-121147",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-04T20:41:44.554987Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T19:07:49.340Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Tata Motors iRA 2.0",
"vendor": "Tata Motors",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "versions 26.7.3 and below"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Tata Motors iRA.ev",
"vendor": "Tata Motors",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "versions 26.7.2 and below"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:tata_motors:tata_motors_ira_2.0:versions_26.7.3_and_below:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:tata_motors:tata_motors_ira.ev:versions_26.7.2_and_below:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "This vulnerability is reported by Pranav Rajendran."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "This vulnerability exists in the iRA 2.0 and iRA.ev mobile applications due to improper implementation of SSL certificate pinning in the network security configuration, resulting in ineffective certificate pinning controls. An attacker positioned to intercept network traffic could exploit this vulnerability to intercept or modify communications between the application and its backend services."
}
],
"value": "This vulnerability exists in the iRA 2.0 and iRA.ev mobile applications due to improper implementation of SSL certificate pinning in the network security configuration, resulting in ineffective certificate pinning controls. An attacker positioned to intercept network traffic could exploit this vulnerability to intercept or modify communications between the application and its backend services."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-94",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-94 Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper certificate validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-04T12:43:17.895Z",
"orgId": "66834db9-ab24-42b4-be80-296b2e40335c",
"shortName": "CERT-In"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.cert-in.org.in/s2cMainServlet?pageid=PUBVLNOTES01\u0026VLCODE=CIVN-2026-0537"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Upgrade to latest versions:\n\u003cbr\u003eTata Motors iRA 2.0 to version 26.8.2 \n\u003cbr\u003eTata Motors iRA.ev to version 26.9.1\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Upgrade to latest versions:\n\nTata Motors iRA 2.0 to version 26.8.2 \n\nTata Motors iRA.ev to version 26.9.1"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Security Misconfiguration Vulnerability in Tata Motors iRA and iRA.ev mobile application",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "66834db9-ab24-42b4-be80-296b2e40335c",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-In",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-121147",
"datePublished": "2026-11-04T12:43:17.895Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-11-03T10:01:29.370Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T19:07:49.340Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-120250 (GCVE-0-2026-120250)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-01 00:57 – Updated: 2026-11-05 15:39- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/marketcalls/openalgo/commit/af… | patch |
| https://github.com/marketcalls/openalgo/blob/main… | release-notes |
| https://github.com/marketcalls/openalgo/blob/96e5… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/marketcalls/openalgo | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openalgo-1.0… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| marketcalls | OpenAlgo |
Affected:
1.0.0.29 , < 2.0.3.1
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-120250",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-05T15:39:05.887315Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T15:39:19.445Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/marketcalls/openalgo",
"product": "OpenAlgo",
"repo": "https://github.com/marketcalls/openalgo",
"vendor": "marketcalls",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.0.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0.29",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Tommaso Bona (ParzivalHack)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "marketcalls"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenAlgo 1.0.0.29 before 2.0.3.1 contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability in utils/email_utils.py and utils/email_debug.py that disables TLS hostname and certificate checks for STARTTLS and SMTPS. Network-positioned attackers can present a forged certificate to intercept SMTP credentials and all later mail, including password-reset links."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-01T00:57:14.226Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/marketcalls/openalgo/commit/af5d5f2cc564ee31cdd1159bc147a9b03cc713ac"
},
{
"name": "OpenAlgo 2.0.3.1 Release Notes",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/marketcalls/openalgo/blob/main/docs/releases/version-2.0.3.1-released.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/marketcalls/openalgo/blob/96e5927e5adbff146f203bf72c7a79add9e6622c/utils/email_utils.py#L403-L406"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/marketcalls/openalgo"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: OpenAlgo 1.0.0.29 before 2.0.3.1 Improper Certificate Validation in SMTP Connections",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openalgo-1.0.0.29-before-2.0.3.1-improper-certificate-validation-in-smtp-connections"
}
],
"title": "OpenAlgo 1.0.0.29 before 2.0.3.1 Improper Certificate Validation in SMTP Connections",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-120250",
"datePublished": "2026-11-01T00:57:14.226Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-31T22:06:00.139Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T15:39:19.445Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-119559 (GCVE-0-2026-119559)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-30 11:31 – Updated: 2026-11-05 21:45- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed/bl… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed/bl… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed/bl… | technical-description |
| https://abraxaslabs.tech/research/openlitespeed-h… | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openlitespee… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| litespeedtech | openlitespeed |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.9.4
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:litespeedtech:openlitespeed:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-119559",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-05T21:42:53.138822Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T21:45:08.355Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://abraxaslabs.tech/research/openlitespeed-h3-mtls-verifycontext"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/litespeedtech/openlitespeed",
"product": "openlitespeed",
"repo": "https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed",
"vendor": "litespeedtech",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.9.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:litespeedtech:openlitespeed:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.9.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Abraxas Labs"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenLiteSpeed through 1.9.4 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to evade virtual host client certificate requirements over HTTP/3. Because QuicStream inherits a verifyContext() implementation that always returns true, attackers can present a non-mTLS host\u0027s SNI with a protected Host header to access protected content."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-30T11:31:08.276Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed/blob/v1.9.4/src/http/httpsession.cpp#L1665-L1672"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed/blob/v1.9.4/src/sslpp/hiocrypto.h#L49-L50"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed/blob/v1.9.4/src/quic/quicstream.h#L33-L37"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://abraxaslabs.tech/research/openlitespeed-h3-mtls-verifycontext"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: OpenLiteSpeed through 1.9.4 mTLS Bypass via HTTP/3 SNI and Host Mismatch",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openlitespeed-through-1.9.4-mtls-bypass-via-http-3-sni-and-host-mismatch"
}
],
"title": "OpenLiteSpeed through 1.9.4 mTLS Bypass via HTTP/3 SNI and Host Mismatch",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-119559",
"datePublished": "2026-10-30T11:31:08.276Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-30T10:53:29.316Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T21:45:08.355Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-119190 (GCVE-0-2026-119190)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-29 19:25 – Updated: 2026-10-29 20:25| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/58c… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| digitalbazaar | forge |
Affected:
< 1.4.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-119190",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-29T20:24:38.825329Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T20:25:04.131Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-5x38-2vff-x55p"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "forge",
"vendor": "digitalbazaar",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.4.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.1, node-forge parsed deprecated extension OIDs 2.5.29.10 and 2.5.29.13 as basicConstraints, and pki.verifyCertificateChain() used the first extension with that name. Exploitation requires a CA trusted by the application to issue a certificate carrying an attacker-supplied deprecated-OID extension, commonly because the CA copies extensions from a certificate signing request. By placing a permissive deprecated extension before the genuine 2.5.29.19 basicConstraints extension, the certificate holder could have the certificate accepted as a CA and issue certificates for arbitrary names, enabling server or client impersonation. If the issuing CA adds a keyUsage extension without keyCertSign, node-forge rejects the chain. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-436",
"description": "CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T19:25:09.677Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-5x38-2vff-x55p",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-5x38-2vff-x55p"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/58c06bc251856b409c30ecb35a93f5f6c9bbc84a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/58c06bc251856b409c30ecb35a93f5f6c9bbc84a"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/releases/tag/v1.4.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/releases/tag/v1.4.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5x38-2vff-x55p",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Forge: X.509 basicConstraints bypass in verifyCertificateChain() via deprecated extension OIDs 2.5.29.10 and 2.5.29.13"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-119190",
"datePublished": "2026-10-29T19:25:09.677Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-29T16:04:48.728Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T20:25:04.131Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
Mitigation
If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.