PYSEC-2026-4081
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-10-01 16:38 - Updated: 2026-10-01 17:10Summary
ENABLED_TOOLS and TOOLSETS filters are enforced at tools/list time only. tools/call dispatches from the full unfiltered tool registry (73 tools). Any user with access to the server endpoint that knows a tool name can invoke it directly. Tool names are not secret since mcp-atlassian is open source. Any direct JSON-RPC call bypasses the restriction entirely.
READ_ONLY_MODE is not affected: it has dual enforcement at list time (_list_tools_mcp) and call time @check_write_access decorator. The developers applied the correct pattern to READ_ONLY_MODE but not to ENABLED_TOOLS or toolsets - confirming this is an implementation oversight.
Impact
Any user with access to the MCP server's HTTP endpoint can invoke any of the 73 registered tools regardless of ENABLED_TOOLS or TOOLSETS configuration - including write and delete operations on Jira issues, Confluence pages, etc. Operators deploying mcp-atlassian via Streamable HTTP rely on ENABLED_TOOLS to enforce least-privilege access; the bypass invalidates that model entirely.
The security impact concentrates in multi-user / HTTP-transport deployments, where the tool filter is a trust boundary between clients. In a single-user stdio deployment there is no second principal to defend against.
Details
In src/mcp_atlassian/servers/main.py, AtlassianMCP overrides _list_tools_mcp and applies the TOOLSETS and ENABLED_TOOLS filters before returning the tool list to clients. The _call_tool_mcp handler is not overridden. FastMCP's default _call_tool_mcp resolves the tool from the local tool manager / mounted servers, the full unfiltered inventory, so the filters never apply at call time.
Proof of Concept
All calls are issued against the HTTP transport, with ENABLED_TOOLS=jira_search configured - only jira_search should be reachable.
Step 1 - negative control: tools/list correctly filters by ENABLED_TOOLS:
req → tools/list
← { "tools": [ { "name": "jira_search" } ] } # only 1 tool; jira_get_issue / jira_create_issue absent
Step 2 - confidentiality bypass: tools/call dispatches jira_get_issue despite its exclusion from the list:
req → tools/call jira_get_issue { "issue_key": "SEC-1" }
← { ... issue fields (summary, status, ...) ... } # executed; not blocked
Step 3 - integrity bypass: tools/call dispatches the write tool jira_create_issue:
req → tools/call jira_create_issue
{ "project_key": "SEC", "summary": "[PoC] ENABLED_TOOLS bypass", "issue_type": "Task" }
← { ... "key": "SEC-<n>" ... } # issue created despite ENABLED_TOOLS=jira_search
Step 1 proves the filter exists and is enforced at list time, so Steps 2–3 are a genuine authorization bypass, not an open/unconfigured endpoint. The same result holds with TOOLSETS=jira_read configured: write tools are absent from tools/list yet execute via tools/call.
Local reproduction
Extract enabled_tools_bypass_tool_authorization.zip:
# Fill Atlassian credentials in docker-compose.yml (ENABLED_TOOLS=jira_search is preset);
# ensure issue SEC-1 exists, or update the project/issue key in poc.sh
docker compose up -d # mcp-atlassian, streamable-http, 0.0.0.0, ENABLED_TOOLS=jira_search
./poc.sh # exits 0 on success
docker compose down -v
Requires Docker, curl, jq, and an Atlassian Cloud site with a Jira project (free tier works). The script runs the three steps above: it confirms tools/list returns only jira_search, then dispatches the excluded jira_get_issue (read) and jira_create_issue (write) via tools/call. The test issue it creates is deleted automatically on exit.
Credit
Discovered by Francisco Rosales of Manifold Security
| Name | purl | mcp-atlassian | pkg:pypi/mcp-atlassian |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "mcp-atlassian",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/mcp-atlassian"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.22.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.1.1",
"0.1.10",
"0.1.11",
"0.1.12",
"0.1.13",
"0.1.14",
"0.1.15",
"0.1.16",
"0.1.2",
"0.1.3",
"0.1.4",
"0.1.6",
"0.1.7",
"0.1.8",
"0.1.9",
"0.10.0",
"0.10.1",
"0.10.2",
"0.10.3",
"0.10.4",
"0.10.5",
"0.10.6",
"0.11.0",
"0.11.1",
"0.11.10",
"0.11.11",
"0.11.12",
"0.11.2",
"0.11.2a2",
"0.11.3",
"0.11.4",
"0.11.5",
"0.11.6",
"0.11.7",
"0.11.8",
"0.11.9",
"0.12.0",
"0.13.0",
"0.13.1",
"0.14.0",
"0.14.1",
"0.14.2",
"0.14.3",
"0.15.0",
"0.16.0",
"0.16.1",
"0.17.0",
"0.18.0",
"0.18.1",
"0.19.0",
"0.2.0",
"0.2.1",
"0.2.2",
"0.2.3",
"0.2.4",
"0.2.5",
"0.2.6",
"0.20.0",
"0.20.1",
"0.21.0",
"0.21.1",
"0.3.0",
"0.3.1",
"0.4.0",
"0.5.0",
"0.6.0",
"0.6.1",
"0.6.2",
"0.6.3",
"0.6.4",
"0.6.5",
"0.7.0",
"0.7.1",
"0.8.0",
"0.8.1",
"0.8.2",
"0.8.3",
"0.8.4",
"0.9.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-77243",
"GHSA-3r68-hf9h-887v"
],
"details": "### Summary\n\n`ENABLED_TOOLS` and `TOOLSETS` filters are enforced at `tools/list` time only. `tools/call` dispatches from the full unfiltered tool registry (73 tools). Any user with access to the server endpoint that knows a tool name can invoke it directly. Tool names are not secret since mcp-atlassian is open source. Any direct JSON-RPC call bypasses the restriction entirely.\n\n`READ_ONLY_MODE` is **not** affected: it has dual enforcement at list time (`_list_tools_mcp`) and call time `@check_write_access decorator`. The developers applied the correct pattern to `READ_ONLY_MODE` but not to `ENABLED_TOOLS` or `toolsets` - confirming this is an implementation oversight.\n\n### Impact\n\nAny user with access to the MCP server\u0027s HTTP endpoint can invoke any of the 73 registered tools regardless of `ENABLED_TOOLS` or `TOOLSETS` configuration - including write and delete operations on Jira issues, Confluence pages, etc. Operators deploying mcp-atlassian via Streamable HTTP rely on `ENABLED_TOOLS` to enforce least-privilege access; the bypass invalidates that model entirely.\n\nThe security impact concentrates in multi-user / HTTP-transport deployments, where the tool filter is a trust boundary between clients. In a single-user stdio deployment there is no second principal to defend against.\n\n### Details\nIn `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/main.py`, AtlassianMCP overrides `_list_tools_mcp` and applies the `TOOLSETS` and `ENABLED_TOOLS` filters before returning the tool list to clients. The `_call_tool_mcp` handler is not overridden. FastMCP\u0027s default `_call_tool_mcp` resolves the tool from the local tool manager / mounted servers, the full unfiltered inventory, so the filters never apply at call time.\n\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\nAll calls are issued against the HTTP transport, with `ENABLED_TOOLS=jira_search` configured - only `jira_search` should be reachable.\n\nStep 1 - negative control: tools/list correctly filters by ENABLED_TOOLS:\n```\nreq \u2192 tools/list\n\u2190 { \"tools\": [ { \"name\": \"jira_search\" } ] } # only 1 tool; jira_get_issue / jira_create_issue absent\n```\n\nStep 2 - confidentiality bypass: tools/call dispatches jira_get_issue despite its exclusion from the list:\n```\nreq \u2192 tools/call jira_get_issue { \"issue_key\": \"SEC-1\" }\n\u2190 { ... issue fields (summary, status, ...) ... } # executed; not blocked\n```\n\nStep 3 - integrity bypass: tools/call dispatches the write tool jira_create_issue:\n```\nreq \u2192 tools/call jira_create_issue\n { \"project_key\": \"SEC\", \"summary\": \"[PoC] ENABLED_TOOLS bypass\", \"issue_type\": \"Task\" }\n\u2190 { ... \"key\": \"SEC-\u003cn\u003e\" ... } # issue created despite ENABLED_TOOLS=jira_search\n```\n\nStep 1 proves the filter exists and is enforced at list time, so Steps 2\u20133 are a genuine authorization bypass, not an open/unconfigured endpoint. The same result holds with TOOLSETS=jira_read configured: write tools are absent from tools/list yet execute via tools/call.\n\n**Local reproduction**\n\nExtract `enabled_tools_bypass_tool_authorization.zip`:\n```\n# Fill Atlassian credentials in docker-compose.yml (ENABLED_TOOLS=jira_search is preset);\n# ensure issue SEC-1 exists, or update the project/issue key in poc.sh\ndocker compose up -d # mcp-atlassian, streamable-http, 0.0.0.0, ENABLED_TOOLS=jira_search\n./poc.sh # exits 0 on success\ndocker compose down -v\n```\n\n\u003eRequires Docker, curl, jq, and an Atlassian Cloud site with a Jira project (free tier works). The script runs the three steps above: it confirms tools/list returns only jira_search, then dispatches the excluded jira_get_issue (read) and jira_create_issue (write) via tools/call. The test issue it creates is deleted automatically on exit.\n\n### Credit\nDiscovered by [Francisco Rosales](https://www.linkedin.com/in/francisco-rosales-celis/) of [Manifold Security](https://manifold.security/)",
"id": "PYSEC-2026-4081",
"modified": "2026-10-01T17:10:29.899448Z",
"published": "2026-10-01T16:38:35.193604Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/security/advisories/GHSA-3r68-hf9h-887v"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-77243"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/pull/1448"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/commit/b041733473f95119dd539542a43c280737a8e460"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/sooperset/mcp-atlassian"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/releases/tag/v0.22.0"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/mcp-atlassian"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3r68-hf9h-887v"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "MCP Atlassian: ENABLED_TOOLS / Toolset authorization bypass"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.