PYSEC-2026-3677

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-08-19 11:56 - Updated: 2026-08-19 12:16
VLAI
Details

Summary

Repo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur

When ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False (an explicitly supported and documented configuration), POST /api/1/authorities with type=subca never verifies that the caller holds AuthorityPermission on the supplied parent authority. The parent field is resolved by AssociatedAuthoritySchema via a raw fetch_objects(Authority, data) lookup, then passed straight through service.create → mint → cryptography-issuer.create_authority, which loads options["parent"].authority_certificate.private_key and signs a brand-new intermediate CA on the caller's behalf.

Any authenticated non-read-only user can therefore mint a sub-CA chained to any internal root whose private key Lemur holds — including roots they hold no role on — attach a role they already belong to, and immediately issue or offline-sign trusted leaf certificates for arbitrary names.

Affected route

POST /api/1/authorities (with type=subca)

Affected code

Impact

In deployments that set ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False to enable self-service CA creation, any authenticated non-read-only user — with zero permission on a given internal root CA — can obtain a working intermediate CA chained to that root. They can then:

  • Issue TLS certificates for arbitrary names trusted by every relying party that trusts the internal root, bypassing LEMUR_ALLOWED_DOMAINS, sensitive-domain flags, and the per-user domain-authorization plugin.
  • Export the sub-CA private key and sign end-entity certificates entirely outside Lemur, defeating all in-product issuance controls.

This converts "can create a self-contained test CA" into "can mint trusted certs under any internal PKI root in the organisation". The ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION documentation does not warn operators of this consequence.

Root cause

AuthoritiesList.post evaluates AuthorityCreatorPermission (a global "may create authorities" flag) and StrictRolePermission, but never evaluates AuthorityPermission(parent.id, parent.roles) against the caller-supplied parent. AssociatedAuthoritySchema is a pure lookup schema with no authz hook, and neither authorities.service.create nor mint re-check before invoking issuer_plugin.create_authority(options). The bundled cryptography-issuer then uses the parent's stored private key directly.

Validated evidence

Static trace, confirmed by code inspection (validation status: CONFIRMED):

  • parent is loaded via AssociatedAuthoritySchema (raw fetch_objects), passed unchecked through views.post → service.create → mint → plugin.create_authority → issue_certificate, where the parent authority's stored private key is read and used to sign the new intermediate.
  • No call to AuthorityPermission(parent.id, ...) exists anywhere on this path.
  • Precondition ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False is an explicitly supported config (docs/administration.rst:517).

Proof of concept / reproducer

Status: reconstructed from source report (static control-flow trace; not executed against a live CA).

Preconditions: ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False; attacker is an authenticated Lemur user holding any role other than read-only; <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID> is any internal cryptography-issuer root CA the attacker holds no role on; <ATTACKER_ROLE> is any role the attacker already belongs to.

curl -sS -X POST "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/authorities" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
        "name": "attacker-subca",
        "owner": "attacker@example.com",
        "description": "poc",
        "type": "subca",
        "parent": {"id": <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID>},
        "plugin": {"slug": "cryptography-issuer"},
        "roles": [{"name": "<ATTACKER_ROLE>"}],
        "commonName": "attacker-intermediate",
        "validityYears": 1
      }'

The response contains a new authority whose authority_certificate is signed by <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID>'s private key. The caller is recorded as creator and holds <ATTACKER_ROLE> on it, so POST /api/1/certificates against the new authority succeeds (and skips allowed_issuance_for_domain because is_private_authority is true).

Static-trace validation command from the source report:

grep -n 'parent' lemur/authorities/schemas.py lemur/authorities/views.py lemur/authorities/service.py \
  && sed -n '37,55p' lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py

Source artifact: audit/harnesses/public-repo-threat-model-harness/results/netflix-lemur-100run-mythos-20260627T051129Z/findings.jsonl (run_022, finding cluster lemur-subca-parent-authz, 5/100 runs).

Suggested fix

In AuthoritiesList.post (or authorities.service.create), when data.get('parent') is present, enforce AuthorityPermission(parent.id, [r.name for r in parent.roles]).can() before invoking the issuer plugin, regardless of ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION. Additionally, update the ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION documentation to state that disabling it currently grants every authenticated user the ability to chain sub-CAs off any internal root whose private key Lemur holds. Consider also requiring admin (or an explicit per-parent capability) for any type=subca creation independent of the global flag.

Impacted products
Name purl
lemur pkg:pypi/lemur

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "lemur",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/lemur"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.9.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.11.0",
        "0.2.1",
        "0.8.0",
        "0.8.1",
        "0.9.0",
        "1.0.0",
        "1.1.0",
        "1.2.0",
        "1.3.1",
        "1.3.2",
        "1.4.0",
        "1.5.0",
        "1.6.0",
        "1.7.0",
        "1.8.0",
        "1.8.1",
        "1.8.2",
        "1.9.0",
        "1.9.1",
        "1.9.2"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-71317",
    "GHSA-g7p5-89mh-248h"
  ],
  "details": "## Summary\n\nRepo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur\n\nWhen `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False` (an explicitly supported and documented configuration), `POST /api/1/authorities` with `type=subca` never verifies that the caller holds `AuthorityPermission` on the supplied `parent` authority. The `parent` field is resolved by `AssociatedAuthoritySchema` via a raw `fetch_objects(Authority, data)` lookup, then passed straight through `service.create \u2192 mint \u2192 cryptography-issuer.create_authority`, which loads `options[\"parent\"].authority_certificate.private_key` and signs a brand-new intermediate CA on the caller\u0027s behalf.\n\nAny authenticated non-read-only user can therefore mint a sub-CA chained to any internal root whose private key Lemur holds \u2014 including roots they hold no role on \u2014 attach a role they already belong to, and immediately issue or offline-sign trusted leaf certificates for arbitrary names.\n\n## Affected route\n\n`POST /api/1/authorities` (with `type=subca`)\n\n## Affected code\n\n- [`lemur/authorities/views.py:231`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/authorities/views.py#L231) \u2014 gates only on `AuthorityCreatorPermission()` + `StrictRolePermission()`; no `AuthorityPermission` on `data[\u0027parent\u0027]`\n- [`lemur/authorities/schemas.py:58`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/authorities/schemas.py#L58) \u2014 `parent = fields.Nested(AssociatedAuthoritySchema)`; `validate_subca` only checks presence\n- [`lemur/schemas.py:107`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/schemas.py#L107) \u2014 `AssociatedAuthoritySchema.get_object` \u2192 `fetch_objects(Authority, data)` resolves any authority by id/name with no permission check\n- [`lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py:40`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py#L40) \u2014 `private_key = options[\"authority\"].authority_certificate.private_key` (set from `options[\"parent\"]`) signs the new intermediate\n- [`lemur/auth/permissions.py:62`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/auth/permissions.py#L62) \u2014 `AuthorityCreatorPermission` becomes always-allow when `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False`\n- [`lemur/certificates/views.py:538`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/lemur/certificates/views.py#L538) \u2014 `is_private_authority` (true for `cryptography-issuer`) skips `USER_DOMAIN_AUTHORIZATION_PROVIDER` for subsequent leaf issuance\n\n## Impact\n\nIn deployments that set `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False` to enable self-service CA creation, any authenticated non-read-only user \u2014 with zero permission on a given internal root CA \u2014 can obtain a working intermediate CA chained to that root. They can then:\n\n- Issue TLS certificates for arbitrary names trusted by every relying party that trusts the internal root, bypassing `LEMUR_ALLOWED_DOMAINS`, sensitive-domain flags, and the per-user domain-authorization plugin.\n- Export the sub-CA private key and sign end-entity certificates entirely outside Lemur, defeating all in-product issuance controls.\n\nThis converts \"can create a self-contained test CA\" into \"can mint trusted certs under any internal PKI root in the organisation\". The `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION` documentation does not warn operators of this consequence.\n\n## Root cause\n\n`AuthoritiesList.post` evaluates `AuthorityCreatorPermission` (a global \"may create authorities\" flag) and `StrictRolePermission`, but never evaluates `AuthorityPermission(parent.id, parent.roles)` against the caller-supplied `parent`. `AssociatedAuthoritySchema` is a pure lookup schema with no authz hook, and neither `authorities.service.create` nor `mint` re-check before invoking `issuer_plugin.create_authority(options)`. The bundled `cryptography-issuer` then uses the parent\u0027s stored private key directly.\n\n## Validated evidence\n\nStatic trace, confirmed by code inspection (validation status: `CONFIRMED`):\n\n- `parent` is loaded via `AssociatedAuthoritySchema` (raw `fetch_objects`), passed unchecked through `views.post \u2192 service.create \u2192 mint \u2192 plugin.create_authority \u2192 issue_certificate`, where the parent authority\u0027s stored private key is read and used to sign the new intermediate.\n- No call to `AuthorityPermission(parent.id, ...)` exists anywhere on this path.\n- Precondition `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False` is an explicitly supported config ([`docs/administration.rst:517`](https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/blob/main/docs/administration.rst#L517)).\n\n## Proof of concept / reproducer\n\nStatus: reconstructed from source report (static control-flow trace; not executed against a live CA).\n\nPreconditions: `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False`; attacker is an authenticated Lemur user holding any role other than `read-only`; `\u003cPARENT_AUTHORITY_ID\u003e` is any internal `cryptography-issuer` root CA the attacker holds no role on; `\u003cATTACKER_ROLE\u003e` is any role the attacker already belongs to.\n\n```bash\ncurl -sS -X POST \"\u003cTARGET_BASE_URL\u003e/api/1/authorities\" \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Bearer \u003cAUTH_TOKEN\u003e\" \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\n        \"name\": \"attacker-subca\",\n        \"owner\": \"attacker@example.com\",\n        \"description\": \"poc\",\n        \"type\": \"subca\",\n        \"parent\": {\"id\": \u003cPARENT_AUTHORITY_ID\u003e},\n        \"plugin\": {\"slug\": \"cryptography-issuer\"},\n        \"roles\": [{\"name\": \"\u003cATTACKER_ROLE\u003e\"}],\n        \"commonName\": \"attacker-intermediate\",\n        \"validityYears\": 1\n      }\u0027\n```\n\nThe response contains a new authority whose `authority_certificate` is signed by `\u003cPARENT_AUTHORITY_ID\u003e`\u0027s private key. The caller is recorded as creator and holds `\u003cATTACKER_ROLE\u003e` on it, so `POST /api/1/certificates` against the new authority succeeds (and skips `allowed_issuance_for_domain` because `is_private_authority` is true).\n\nStatic-trace validation command from the source report:\n\n```bash\ngrep -n \u0027parent\u0027 lemur/authorities/schemas.py lemur/authorities/views.py lemur/authorities/service.py \\\n  \u0026\u0026 sed -n \u002737,55p\u0027 lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py\n```\n\nSource artifact: `audit/harnesses/public-repo-threat-model-harness/results/netflix-lemur-100run-mythos-20260627T051129Z/findings.jsonl` (run_022, finding cluster `lemur-subca-parent-authz`, 5/100 runs).\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nIn `AuthoritiesList.post` (or `authorities.service.create`), when `data.get(\u0027parent\u0027)` is present, enforce `AuthorityPermission(parent.id, [r.name for r in parent.roles]).can()` before invoking the issuer plugin, regardless of `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION`. Additionally, update the `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION` documentation to state that disabling it currently grants every authenticated user the ability to chain sub-CAs off any internal root whose private key Lemur holds. Consider also requiring admin (or an explicit per-parent capability) for any `type=subca` creation independent of the global flag.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2026-3677",
  "modified": "2026-08-19T12:16:27.512565Z",
  "published": "2026-08-19T11:56:28.516318Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/security/advisories/GHSA-g7p5-89mh-248h"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/commit/8669011203ca3dd89d9e39bab9ef6850eca723f9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Netflix/lemur"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/releases/tag/v1.9.3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/lemur"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-g7p5-89mh-248h"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-71317"
    }
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Lemur: Sub-CA creation never checks `AuthorityPermission` on the parent authority"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…