ghsa-x323-9hmm-gv8q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:18
Modified
2024-07-25 15:30
Severity ?
Details
Equation Editor in Microsoft Office 2007, Microsoft Office 2010, Microsoft Office 2013, and Microsoft Office 2016 allow a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way objects are handled in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE is unique from CVE-2018-0797 and CVE-2018-0812.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-0802", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2018-01-10T01:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Equation Editor in Microsoft Office 2007, Microsoft Office 2010, Microsoft Office 2013, and Microsoft Office 2016 allow a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way objects are handled in memory, aka \"Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability\". This CVE is unique from CVE-2018-0797 and CVE-2018-0812.", id: "GHSA-x323-9hmm-gv8q", modified: "2024-07-25T15:30:34Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:18:29Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0802", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://0patch.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-bug-that-killed-equation-editor-how.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/rxwx/CVE-2018-0802", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/zldww2011/CVE-2018-0802_POC", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2018-0802", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://research.checkpoint.com/another-office-equation-rce-vulnerability", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102347", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040153", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.