ghsa-wpw2-f6x3-8f7j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-02-05 06:30
Modified
2024-02-05 06:30
Severity ?
Details
Brandon Rothel from QED Secure Solutions has found that the VAPIX API tcptest.cgi did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible remote code execution. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator-privileged service account. The impact of exploiting this vulnerability is lower with operator-privileges compared to administrator-privileges service accounts. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-5677" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-78", "CWE-94" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-05T06:15:46Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Brandon\nRothel from QED Secure Solutions has found that the VAPIX API tcptest.cgi\ndid not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible remote code\nexecution. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an\noperator- or administrator-privileged service account. The impact of exploiting\nthis vulnerability is lower with operator-privileges compared to\nadministrator-privileges service accounts. Axis has released patched AXIS OS\nversions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory\nfor more information and solution. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "id": "GHSA-wpw2-f6x3-8f7j", "modified": "2024-02-05T06:30:29Z", "published": "2024-02-05T06:30:29Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5677" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.axis.com/dam/public/a9/dd/f1/cve-2023-5677-en-US-424335.pdf" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.