GHSA-WJ23-FX8V-7598
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-04 18:31 – Updated: 2026-09-04 18:31IBM UCD - IBM UrbanCode Deploy 7.2 through 7.2.3.25, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.20 and IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.15, 8.1 through 8.1.2.8, and 8.2 through 8.2.2.1 IBM DevOps Deploy / IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) is susceptible to an formation disclosure vulnerability when processing redacted property values. If a deployment is configured with a secure property that starts with certain non-ASCII characters, the redaction engine may fail to mask subsequent ASCII secure values embedded inside unsecure properties. An authenticated user with permissions to view deployment request details could exploit this flaw via the UI or API to view sensitive values in plain text that should otherwise be redacted.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-78658"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-212"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-04T16:17:59Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM UCD - IBM UrbanCode Deploy 7.2 through 7.2.3.25, and 7.3 through 7.3.2.20 and IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.15, 8.1 through 8.1.2.8, and 8.2 through 8.2.2.1 IBM DevOps Deploy / IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) is susceptible to an formation disclosure vulnerability when processing redacted property values. If a deployment is configured with a secure property that starts with certain non-ASCII characters, the redaction engine may fail to mask subsequent ASCII secure values embedded inside unsecure properties. An authenticated user with permissions to view deployment request details could exploit this flaw via the UI or API to view sensitive values in plain text that should otherwise be redacted.",
"id": "GHSA-wj23-fx8v-7598",
"modified": "2026-09-04T18:31:24Z",
"published": "2026-09-04T18:31:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78658"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286256"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.