ghsa-rhhp-94ch-9rf5
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sock_map: fix a NULL pointer dereference in sock_map_link_update_prog()
The following race condition could trigger a NULL pointer dereference:
sock_map_link_detach(): sock_map_link_update_prog(): mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex); ... sockmap_link->map = NULL; mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex); mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex); ... sock_map_prog_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map); mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
Fix it by adding a NULL pointer check. In this specific case, it makes no sense to update a link which is being released.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-50260", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-476", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-11-09T11:15:11Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsock_map: fix a NULL pointer dereference in sock_map_link_update_prog()\n\nThe following race condition could trigger a NULL pointer dereference:\n\nsock_map_link_detach():\t\tsock_map_link_update_prog():\n mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);\n ...\n sockmap_link->map = NULL;\n mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);\n \t\t\t\t mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);\n\t\t\t\t ...\n\t\t\t\t sock_map_prog_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map);\n\t\t\t\t mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);\n <continue>\n\nFix it by adding a NULL pointer check. In this specific case, it makes\nno sense to update a link which is being released.", id: "GHSA-rhhp-94ch-9rf5", modified: "2024-11-13T21:30:32Z", published: "2024-11-09T12:30:49Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50260", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/740be3b9a6d73336f8c7d540842d0831dc7a808b", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9afe35fdda16e09d5bd3c49a68ba8c680dd678bd", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.