GHSA-MJQX-C6F6-7RC2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-09 23:19 – Updated: 2026-07-09 23:19
VLAI
Summary
mint: Content-Length header accepts non-RFC "+" sign prefix
Details

Summary

Mint's HTTP/1 client accepts Content-Length header values with a leading + sign (e.g. +0, +123), which RFC 7230 forbids (Content-Length = 1*DIGIT). On a connection shared with a strict fronting proxy or load balancer, this parser disagreement is a response-smuggling primitive: the proxy frames the body one way, Mint frames it another, and bytes meant for one response leak into the next consumer's response stream.

Details

'Elixir.Mint.HTTP1.Parse':content_length_header/1 in lib/mint/http1/parse.ex parses the header value with Integer.parse/1. By design, Integer.parse/1 accepts an optional + or - sign prefix. The length >= 0 guard rules out negatives, but inputs such as "+0", "+123", or "+1" pass through and are returned as valid lengths.

A strict proxy or load balancer rejects or reframes Content-Length: +0\r\n, while Mint silently treats it as 0. When Mint reuses the socket (keep-alive, pipelining, or any pooled connection) and the connection is shared with a proxy that frames the same bytes differently, trailing bytes the proxy attributes to response N are attributed by Mint to response N+1. Across trust boundaries (shared pools, multi-tenant fronting) this enables response smuggling.

PoC

  1. Stand up a raw TCP server that returns HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\nContent-Length: +0\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\n\r\n<smuggled bytes>.
  2. Connect a Mint HTTP/1 client to the server and issue a request.
  3. Observe that Mint reports the response as status 200 with Content-Length: "+0" and an empty body, leaving the smuggled bytes sitting in the socket buffer for the next response.

Impact

Response-smuggling / request-response desync primitive in Mint's HTTP/1 client parser. Anyone using Mint (directly or via Finch, Tesla's Mint adapter, Req, etc.) to talk through a shared or pooled connection where a fronting proxy enforces RFC 7230 strictly while Mint does not is exposed. The attacker is the response producer (a malicious or compromised upstream, or anything that can inject bytes into a shared origin response); exploitation into a cross-request data leak additionally requires the deployment to share a Mint connection across trust boundaries.

Resources

  • Introduction commit: https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/65e0e86d799a6d3b08e4372fccdd9747535e0dd6
  • Patch commit: https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/47e48027480228e4e32a0b4df39db497b4804921
Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Hex",
        "name": "mint"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.9.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-49753"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-444"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-09T23:19:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-02T16:16:44Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nMint\u0027s HTTP/1 client accepts `Content-Length` header values with a leading `+` sign (e.g. `+0`, `+123`), which RFC 7230 forbids (`Content-Length = 1*DIGIT`). On a connection shared with a strict fronting proxy or load balancer, this parser disagreement is a response-smuggling primitive: the proxy frames the body one way, Mint frames it another, and bytes meant for one response leak into the next consumer\u0027s response stream.\n\n### Details\n\n`\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1.Parse\u0027:content_length_header/1` in `lib/mint/http1/parse.ex` parses the header value with `Integer.parse/1`. By design, `Integer.parse/1` accepts an optional `+` or `-` sign prefix. The `length \u003e= 0` guard rules out negatives, but inputs such as `\"+0\"`, `\"+123\"`, or `\"+1\"` pass through and are returned as valid lengths.\n\nA strict proxy or load balancer rejects or reframes `Content-Length: +0\\r\\n`, while Mint silently treats it as `0`. When Mint reuses the socket (keep-alive, pipelining, or any pooled connection) and the connection is shared with a proxy that frames the same bytes differently, trailing bytes the proxy attributes to response N are attributed by Mint to response N+1. Across trust boundaries (shared pools, multi-tenant fronting) this enables response smuggling.\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Stand up a raw TCP server that returns `HTTP/1.1 200 OK\\r\\nContent-Length: +0\\r\\nConnection: keep-alive\\r\\n\\r\\n\u003csmuggled bytes\u003e`.\n2. Connect a Mint HTTP/1 client to the server and issue a request.\n3. Observe that Mint reports the response as status 200 with `Content-Length: \"+0\"` and an empty body, leaving the smuggled bytes sitting in the socket buffer for the next response.\n\n### Impact\n\nResponse-smuggling / request-response desync primitive in Mint\u0027s HTTP/1 client parser. Anyone using Mint (directly or via Finch, Tesla\u0027s Mint adapter, Req, etc.) to talk through a shared or pooled connection where a fronting proxy enforces RFC 7230 strictly while Mint does not is exposed. The attacker is the response producer (a malicious or compromised upstream, or anything that can inject bytes into a shared origin response); exploitation into a cross-request data leak additionally requires the deployment to share a Mint connection across trust boundaries.\n\n## Resources\n\n* Introduction commit: https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/65e0e86d799a6d3b08e4372fccdd9747535e0dd6\n* Patch commit: https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/47e48027480228e4e32a0b4df39db497b4804921",
  "id": "GHSA-mjqx-c6f6-7rc2",
  "modified": "2026-07-09T23:19:17Z",
  "published": "2026-07-09T23:19:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/security/advisories/GHSA-mjqx-c6f6-7rc2"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49753"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/47e48027480228e4e32a0b4df39db497b4804921"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-49753.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-49753"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "mint: Content-Length header accepts non-RFC \"+\" sign prefix"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.