GHSA-GCR7-HVF6-PH59

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-14 21:32 – Updated: 2025-04-14 21:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ceph: fix possible deadlock when holding Fwb to get inline_data

1, mount with wsync. 2, create a file with O_RDWR, and the request was sent to mds.0:

ceph_atomic_open()--> ceph_mdsc_do_request(openc) finish_open(file, dentry, ceph_open)--> ceph_open()--> ceph_init_file()--> ceph_init_file_info()--> ceph_uninline_data()--> { ... if (inline_version == 1 || / initial version, no data / inline_version == CEPH_INLINE_NONE) goto out_unlock; ... }

The inline_version will be 1, which is the initial version for the new create file. And here the ci->i_inline_version will keep with 1, it's buggy.

3, buffer write to the file immediately:

ceph_write_iter()--> ceph_get_caps(file, need=Fw, want=Fb, ...); generic_perform_write()--> a_ops->write_begin()--> ceph_write_begin()--> netfs_write_begin()--> netfs_begin_read()--> netfs_rreq_submit_slice()--> netfs_read_from_server()--> rreq->netfs_ops->issue_read()--> ceph_netfs_issue_read()--> { ... if (ci->i_inline_version != CEPH_INLINE_NONE && ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline(subreq)) return; ... } ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, Fwb);

The ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline() will send a getattr(Fsr) request to mds.1.

4, then the mds.1 will request the rd lock for CInode::filelock from the auth mds.0, the mds.0 will do the CInode::filelock state transation from excl --> sync, but it need to revoke the Fxwb caps back from the clients.

While the kernel client has aleady held the Fwb caps and waiting for the getattr(Fsr).

It's deadlock!

URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55377

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49296"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:01:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nceph: fix possible deadlock when holding Fwb to get inline_data\n\n1, mount with wsync.\n2, create a file with O_RDWR, and the request was sent to mds.0:\n\n   ceph_atomic_open()--\u003e\n     ceph_mdsc_do_request(openc)\n     finish_open(file, dentry, ceph_open)--\u003e\n       ceph_open()--\u003e\n         ceph_init_file()--\u003e\n           ceph_init_file_info()--\u003e\n             ceph_uninline_data()--\u003e\n             {\n               ...\n               if (inline_version == 1 || /* initial version, no data */\n                   inline_version == CEPH_INLINE_NONE)\n                     goto out_unlock;\n               ...\n             }\n\nThe inline_version will be 1, which is the initial version for the\nnew create file. And here the ci-\u003ei_inline_version will keep with 1,\nit\u0027s buggy.\n\n3, buffer write to the file immediately:\n\n   ceph_write_iter()--\u003e\n     ceph_get_caps(file, need=Fw, want=Fb, ...);\n     generic_perform_write()--\u003e\n       a_ops-\u003ewrite_begin()--\u003e\n         ceph_write_begin()--\u003e\n           netfs_write_begin()--\u003e\n             netfs_begin_read()--\u003e\n               netfs_rreq_submit_slice()--\u003e\n                 netfs_read_from_server()--\u003e\n                   rreq-\u003enetfs_ops-\u003eissue_read()--\u003e\n                     ceph_netfs_issue_read()--\u003e\n                     {\n                       ...\n                       if (ci-\u003ei_inline_version != CEPH_INLINE_NONE \u0026\u0026\n                           ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline(subreq))\n                         return;\n                       ...\n                     }\n     ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, Fwb);\n\nThe ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline() will send a getattr(Fsr) request to\nmds.1.\n\n4, then the mds.1 will request the rd lock for CInode::filelock from\nthe auth mds.0, the mds.0 will do the CInode::filelock state transation\nfrom excl --\u003e sync, but it need to revoke the Fxwb caps back from the\nclients.\n\nWhile the kernel client has aleady held the Fwb caps and waiting for\nthe getattr(Fsr).\n\nIt\u0027s deadlock!\n\nURL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55377",
  "id": "GHSA-gcr7-hvf6-ph59",
  "modified": "2025-04-14T21:32:20Z",
  "published": "2025-04-14T21:32:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49296"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/292b7a7275ce535a1abfa4dd0b2e586162aaae1e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/825978fd6a0defc3c29d8a38b6cea76a0938d21e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…