Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-97FV-H8PQ-9GRG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-15 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-15 18:32

Details

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.

Only IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.

This issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward.

Severity

9.0 (Critical)


                  
                    CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-77866"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-636"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-15T16:17:24Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\n\nOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\n\nThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward.",
  "id": "GHSA-97fv-h8pq-9grg",
  "modified": "2026-09-15T18:32:26Z",
  "published": "2026-09-15T18:32:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-77866"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir/commit/feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77866.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77866"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

CVE-2026-77866 (GCVE-0-2026-77866)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-15 15:38 – Updated: 2026-09-15 15:39

Title

SSRF protection bypass in safeurl via IPv6 addresses and unresolvable hosts

Summary

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block. Only IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected. This issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward.

Severity

9 (Critical)


                        
                          CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N

CWE

CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE-636 - Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')

Assigner

EEF mitre root

References

3 references

URL	Tags
https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77866.html	relatedthird-party-advisory
https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77866	related
https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir/commit/fea…	related

Impacted products

2 products

Vendor	Product	Version
Slab	safeurl	Affected: 0.1.0 , < * (semver) cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl::::::::
Slab	safeurl	Affected: feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70 , < * (git) cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl::::::::

Date Public

2026-09-15 15:38

Credits

Mathias Polligkeit Jonatan Männchen / EEF

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027"
          ],
          "packageName": "safeurl",
          "packageURL": "pkg:hex/safeurl",
          "product": "safeurl",
          "programFiles": [
            "lib/safeurl/safeurl.ex"
          ],
          "programRoutines": [
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:validate/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:allowed?/2"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "vendor": "Slab",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027"
          ],
          "packageName": "slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "packageURL": "pkg:github/slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "product": "safeurl",
          "programFiles": [
            "lib/safeurl/safeurl.ex"
          ],
          "programRoutines": [
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:validate/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:allowed?/2"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "vendor": "Slab",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ],
          "operator": "AND"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Mathias Polligkeit"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "coordinator",
          "value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-09-15T15:38:16.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward.\u003c/p\u003e"
            },
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/markdown",
              "value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\n\nOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\n\nThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\n\nOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\n\nThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-664",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 9,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-918",
              "description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-636",
              "description": "CWE-636 Not Failing Securely (\u0027Failing Open\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T15:39:37.321Z",
        "orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
        "shortName": "EEF"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "EEF CNA record for CVE-2026-77866",
          "tags": [
            "related",
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77866.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "OSV record EEF-CVE-2026-77866",
          "tags": [
            "related"
          ],
          "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77866"
        },
        {
          "name": "Introducing commit feabbd0 in slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "tags": [
            "related"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir/commit/feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "SSRF protection bypass in safeurl via IPv6 addresses and unresolvable hosts"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
    "assignerShortName": "EEF",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-77866",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-15T15:38:15.886Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-30T00:00:01.985Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T15:39:37.321Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.