GHSA-93J5-89VC-PPH4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-18 16:32 – Updated: 2026-08-18 16:32
VLAI
Summary
RabbitMQ Java client ValueReader: Unbounded recursive table/array nesting causes StackOverflowError DoS
Details

Summary

ValueReader.readTable() and readArray() recursively call readFieldValue() with no depth limit. A malicious AMQP peer can crash the client JVM by sending a deeply nested table structure.

Vulnerable Code

src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/ValueReader.java lines 139-155 and 237-249:

private static Map<String, Object> readTable(DataInputStream in) throws IOException {
    long tableLength = unsignedExtend(in.readInt());
    // ...
    while(tableIn.available() > 0) {
        String name = readShortstr(tableIn);
        Object value = readFieldValue(tableIn);  // recursive call
    }
}

static Object readFieldValue(DataInputStream in) throws IOException {
    switch(in.readUnsignedByte()) {
      case 'F': value = readTable(in);  // mutual recursion
      case 'A': value = readArray(in);  // mutual recursion
    }
}

Attack Scenario

A malicious AMQP server (or MitM) sends a connection.start frame with ~580 levels of nested tables. Each level costs ~7 bytes (4-byte length + 1-byte key length + 1-byte key + 1-byte type tag), totaling ~4060 bytes within the 131,072 byte max frame size. With the default JVM stack (~512KB, ~864 bytes/frame), this triggers StackOverflowError, killing the I/O thread.

Exploitable pre-authentication since connection.start is the very first server frame.

Impact

Denial of service. StackOverflowError kills the client I/O thread.

CWE

CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion

Remediation

Add a depth counter to readTable/readArray/readFieldValue and throw MalformedFrameException when exceeding a threshold (e.g., 32).

Severity
8.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.33.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.rabbitmq:amqp-client"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.33.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-69220"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-18T16:32:12Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\n`ValueReader.readTable()` and `readArray()` recursively call `readFieldValue()` with no depth limit. A malicious AMQP peer can crash the client JVM by sending a deeply nested table structure.\n\n## Vulnerable Code\n\n`src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/ValueReader.java` lines 139-155 and 237-249:\n\n```java\nprivate static Map\u003cString, Object\u003e readTable(DataInputStream in) throws IOException {\n    long tableLength = unsignedExtend(in.readInt());\n    // ...\n    while(tableIn.available() \u003e 0) {\n        String name = readShortstr(tableIn);\n        Object value = readFieldValue(tableIn);  // recursive call\n    }\n}\n\nstatic Object readFieldValue(DataInputStream in) throws IOException {\n    switch(in.readUnsignedByte()) {\n      case \u0027F\u0027: value = readTable(in);  // mutual recursion\n      case \u0027A\u0027: value = readArray(in);  // mutual recursion\n    }\n}\n```\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\nA malicious AMQP server (or MitM) sends a `connection.start` frame with ~580 levels of nested tables. Each level costs ~7 bytes (4-byte length + 1-byte key length + 1-byte key + 1-byte type tag), totaling ~4060 bytes within the 131,072 byte max frame size. With the default JVM stack (~512KB, ~864 bytes/frame), this triggers `StackOverflowError`, killing the I/O thread.\n\nExploitable pre-authentication since `connection.start` is the very first server frame.\n\n## Impact\n\nDenial of service. `StackOverflowError` kills the client I/O thread.\n\n## CWE\n\nCWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion\n\n## Remediation\n\nAdd a depth counter to `readTable`/`readArray`/`readFieldValue` and throw `MalformedFrameException` when exceeding a threshold (e.g., 32).",
  "id": "GHSA-93j5-89vc-pph4",
  "modified": "2026-08-18T16:32:12Z",
  "published": "2026-08-18T16:32:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client/security/advisories/GHSA-93j5-89vc-pph4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client/pull/2007"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client/pull/2008"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client/commit/09af76fce136f3136931654a0a1d43095c80e2f0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client/commit/db89e34809fbc6ba4e946615f297f3684ccd0acc"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client/releases/tag/v5.33.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "RabbitMQ Java client ValueReader: Unbounded recursive table/array nesting causes StackOverflowError DoS"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.