ghsa-8w56-gqrj-2wfg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:17
Modified
2024-07-24 18:31
Severity ?
8.1 (High) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Details

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2017-0144",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-20",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2017-03-17T00:59:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka \"Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.\" This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148.",
   id: "GHSA-8w56-gqrj-2wfg",
   modified: "2024-07-24T18:31:13Z",
   published: "2022-05-14T03:17:16Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-0144",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-701903.pdf",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-966341.pdf",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-0144",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41891",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41987",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42030",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42031",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154690/DOUBLEPULSAR-Payload-Execution-Neutralization.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/156196/SMB-DOUBLEPULSAR-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96704",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037991",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.