GHSA-6QMP-H3RM-PC99
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:36 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:36
VLAI
Details
An Improper Access Control issue was discovered in LCDS - Leao Consultoria e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas LTDA ME LAquis SCADA. The following versions are affected: Versions 4.1 and prior versions released before January 20, 2017. An Improper Access Control vulnerability has been identified, which may allow an authenticated user to modify application files to escalate privileges.
Severity
7.3 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-6016"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-05-19T03:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An Improper Access Control issue was discovered in LCDS - Leao Consultoria e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas LTDA ME LAquis SCADA. The following versions are affected: Versions 4.1 and prior versions released before January 20, 2017. An Improper Access Control vulnerability has been identified, which may allow an authenticated user to modify application files to escalate privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-6qmp-h3rm-pc99",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:36:36Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:36:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6016"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-17-075-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96942"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…