ghsa-4whv-g373-hpgc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-12-27 15:31
Modified
2025-01-06 21:30
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: DR, prevent potential error pointer dereference
The dr_domain_add_vport_cap() function generally returns NULL on error but sometimes we want it to return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY) so the caller can retry. The problem here is that "ret" can be either -EBUSY or -ENOMEM and if it's and -ENOMEM then the error pointer is propogated back and eventually dereferenced in dr_ste_v0_build_src_gvmi_qpn_tag().
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-56660" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-27T15:15:25Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5: DR, prevent potential error pointer dereference\n\nThe dr_domain_add_vport_cap() function generally returns NULL on error\nbut sometimes we want it to return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY) so the caller can\nretry. The problem here is that \"ret\" can be either -EBUSY or -ENOMEM\nand if it\u0027s and -ENOMEM then the error pointer is propogated back and\neventually dereferenced in dr_ste_v0_build_src_gvmi_qpn_tag().", "id": "GHSA-4whv-g373-hpgc", "modified": "2025-01-06T21:30:50Z", "published": "2024-12-27T15:31:56Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56660" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/11776cff0b563c8b8a4fa76cab620bfb633a8cb8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/325cf73a1b449fea3158ab99d03a7a717aad1618" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/61f720e801443d4e2a3c0261eda4ad8431458dca" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a59c61a1869ceefc65ef02886f91e8cd0062211f" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.