GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-4VR9-8CJF-VF9C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-10-12 16:00 – Updated: 2021-10-08 22:14
VLAI
Summary
Async-h1 request smuggling possible with long unread bodies
Details

Impact

This vulnerability affects any webserver that uses async-h1 behind a reverse proxy, including all such Tide applications.

If the server does not read the body of a request which is longer than some buffer length, async-h1 will attempt to read a subsequent request from the body content starting at that offset into the body.

One way to exploit this vulnerability would be for an adversary to craft a request such that the body contains a request that would not be noticed by a reverse proxy, allowing it to forge forwarded/x-forwarded headers. If an application trusted the authenticity of these headers, it could be misled by the smuggled request.

Another potential concern with this vulnerability is that if a reverse proxy is sending multiple http clients' requests along the same keep-alive connection, it would be possible for the smuggled request to specify a long content and capture another user's request in its body. This content could be captured in a post request to an endpoint that allows the content to be subsequently retrieved by the adversary.

Patches

This has been addressed in async-h1 2.3.0 and previous versions have been yanked.

Workarounds

none

References

https://github.com/http-rs/async-h1/releases/tag/v2.3.0

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in async-h1 * Contact a core team member on zulip or discord

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "async-h1"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-26281"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-444"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-10-08T22:14:28Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-12-21T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nThis vulnerability affects any webserver that uses async-h1 behind a reverse proxy, including all such Tide applications.\n\nIf the server does not read the body of a request which is longer than some buffer length, async-h1 will attempt to read a subsequent request from the body content starting at that offset into the body.\n\nOne way to exploit this vulnerability would be for an adversary to craft a request such that the body contains a request that would not be noticed by a reverse proxy, allowing it to forge forwarded/x-forwarded headers. If an application trusted the authenticity of these headers, it could be misled by the smuggled request.\n\nAnother potential concern with this vulnerability is that if a reverse proxy is sending multiple http clients\u0027 requests along the same keep-alive connection, it would be possible for the smuggled request to specify a long content and capture another user\u0027s request in its body. This content could be captured in a post request to an endpoint that allows the content to be subsequently retrieved by the adversary.\n\n\n### Patches\nThis has been addressed in async-h1 2.3.0 and previous versions have been yanked.\n\n### Workarounds\nnone\n\n### References\nhttps://github.com/http-rs/async-h1/releases/tag/v2.3.0\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [async-h1](https://github.com/http-rs/async-h1)\n* Contact a core team member on [zulip](https://http-rs.zulip-chat.com) or [discord](https://discord.gg/x2gKzst)",
  "id": "GHSA-4vr9-8cjf-vf9c",
  "modified": "2021-10-08T22:14:28Z",
  "published": "2021-10-12T16:00:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/http-rs/async-h1/security/advisories/GHSA-4vr9-8cjf-vf9c"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-26281"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/http-rs/async-h1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/http-rs/async-h1/releases/tag/v2.3.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2020-0093.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Async-h1 request smuggling possible with long unread bodies"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…