GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2026-84779

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-03 17:17 - Updated: 2026-09-03 18:17
Severity
8.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Summary
Subscriber Broken Access Control in Agentimus – AI SEO, llms.txt &amp; MCP for AI Agents <= 1.51.0 versions.
References
audit@patchstack.comhttps://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/agentimus/vulnerability/wordpress-agentimus-ai-seo-llms-txt-mcp-for-ai-agents-plugin-1-51-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "agentimus",
          "product": "Agentimus \u2013 AI SEO, llms.txt \u0026amp; MCP for AI Agents",
          "vendor": "Sheikh Heera",
          "versions": [
            {
              "changes": [
                {
                  "at": "1.51.1",
                  "status": "unaffected"
                }
              ],
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.51.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Subscriber Broken Access Control in Agentimus \u2013 AI SEO, llms.txt \u0026amp; MCP for AI Agents \u003c= 1.51.0 versions."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-84779",
  "lastModified": "2026-09-03T18:17:31.760",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 8.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-84779",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-09-03T17:33:53.735897Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-09-03T17:17:28.880",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/agentimus/vulnerability/wordpress-agentimus-ai-seo-llms-txt-mcp-for-ai-agents-plugin-1-51-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.