FKIE_CVE-2026-59151
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-10 19:17 - Updated: 2026-07-10 19:20
Severity
Summary
Prowler is a cloud security platform. Prior to 5.30.3, Prowler's SAML authentication flow trusted the email domain asserted in a SAMLResponse when deciding which tenant should receive the final token, and the ACS finish logic in api/src/backend/api/v1/views.py recalculated the tenant from user.email instead of binding token issuance to the validated SAML configuration. An authenticated attacker with a controlled SAML IdP could complete a valid SAML flow for an attacker-controlled domain while asserting an email address from another configured domain, causing a SAMLToken and tenant-scoped JWT to be issued for the wrong tenant and enabling cross-tenant account takeover. This issue is fixed in version 5.30.3.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "prowler",
"vendor": "prowler-cloud",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 5.30.3"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Prowler is a cloud security platform. Prior to 5.30.3, Prowler\u0027s SAML authentication flow trusted the email domain asserted in a SAMLResponse when deciding which tenant should receive the final token, and the ACS finish logic in api/src/backend/api/v1/views.py recalculated the tenant from user.email instead of binding token issuance to the validated SAML configuration. An authenticated attacker with a controlled SAML IdP could complete a valid SAML flow for an attacker-controlled domain while asserting an email address from another configured domain, causing a SAMLToken and tenant-scoped JWT to be issued for the wrong tenant and enabling cross-tenant account takeover. This issue is fixed in version 5.30.3."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-59151",
"lastModified": "2026-07-10T19:20:15.180",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.6,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
"impactScore": 5.8,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-07-10T19:17:26.780",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/commit/bf3b5c2ba713e533014927141b64948c82c8f32e"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/commit/f5ff30ad175bd2edf02cd28872653c1cda5867b7"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11650"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases/tag/5.30.3"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/security/advisories/GHSA-h8m9-jgf8-vwvp"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Undergoing Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-287"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…