fkie_cve-2025-0394
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-14 09:15
Modified
2025-01-14 09:15
Summary
The WordPress CRM, Email & Marketing Automation for WordPress | Award Winner — Groundhogg plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the gh_big_file_upload() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.7.3.5. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The WordPress CRM, Email \u0026 Marketing Automation for WordPress | Award Winner \u2014 Groundhogg plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the gh_big_file_upload() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.7.3.5. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site\u0027s server which may make remote code execution possible."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin WordPress CRM, Email \u0026amp; Marketing Automation para WordPress | Award Winner: Groundhogg es vulnerable a la carga de archivos arbitrarios debido a la falta de validaci\u00f3n del tipo de archivo en la funci\u00f3n gh_big_file_upload() en todas las versiones hasta la 3.7.3.5 incluida. Esto hace posible que atacantes autenticados, con acceso de nivel de autor y superior, carguen archivos arbitrarios en el servidor del sitio afectado, lo que puede hacer posible la ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-0394",
  "lastModified": "2025-01-14T09:15:21.430",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-01-14T09:15:21.430",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/groundhogg/tags/3.7.3.5/includes/big-file-uploader.php#L117"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3221208/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/groundhogg/#developers"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/b2cf3b85-2e2d-43dc-9877-9a740d4fd2fb?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-434"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.