fkie_cve-2024-45679
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-09-18 04:15
Modified
2024-09-20 12:30
Severity ?
Summary
Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Assimp versions prior to 5.4.3 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code by importing a specially crafted file into the product.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Assimp versions prior to 5.4.3 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code by importing a specially crafted file into the product." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "La vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en mont\u00f3n en versiones de Assimp anteriores a 5.4.3 permite a un atacante local ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario importando un archivo especialmente manipulado en el producto." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-45679", "lastModified": "2024-09-20T12:30:51.220", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.4, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.5, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-09-18T04:15:42.080", "references": [ { "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "url": "https://github.com/assimp/assimp/releases/tag/v5.4.3" }, { "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN42386607/" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-122" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.