fkie_cve-2022-48622
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-01-26 09:15
Modified
2024-11-21 07:33
Severity ?
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In GNOME GdkPixbuf (aka gdk-pixbuf) through 2.42.10, the ANI (Windows animated cursor) decoder encounters heap memory corruption (in ani_load_chunk in io-ani.c) when parsing chunks in a crafted .ani file. A crafted file could allow an attacker to overwrite heap metadata, leading to a denial of service or code execution attack. This occurs in gdk_pixbuf_set_option() in gdk-pixbuf.c.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdk-pixbuf/-/issues/202 | Exploit, Issue Tracking | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdk-pixbuf/-/issues/202 | Exploit, Issue Tracking |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:gnome:gdkpixbuf:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "FFAFB1D2-977E-4F83-A644-EC034FB0A447", versionEndIncluding: "2.42.10", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "In GNOME GdkPixbuf (aka gdk-pixbuf) through 2.42.10, the ANI (Windows animated cursor) decoder encounters heap memory corruption (in ani_load_chunk in io-ani.c) when parsing chunks in a crafted .ani file. A crafted file could allow an attacker to overwrite heap metadata, leading to a denial of service or code execution attack. This occurs in gdk_pixbuf_set_option() in gdk-pixbuf.c.", }, { lang: "es", value: "En GNOME GdkPixbuf (también conocido como gdk-pixbuf) hasta 2.42.10, el decodificador ANI (cursor animado de Windows) encuentra corrupción en la memoria del montón (en ani_load_chunk en io-ani.c) al analizar fragmentos en un archivo .ani manipulado. Un archivo manipulado podría permitir a un atacante sobrescribir metadatos del montón, lo que provocaría una denegación de servicio o un ataque de ejecución de código. Esto ocurre en gdk_pixbuf_set_option() en gdk-pixbuf.c.", }, ], id: "CVE-2022-48622", lastModified: "2024-11-21T07:33:37.483", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 7.8, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "REQUIRED", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 5.9, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 7.8, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "REQUIRED", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 5.9, source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", type: "Secondary", }, ], }, published: "2024-01-26T09:15:07.570", references: [ { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking", ], url: "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdk-pixbuf/-/issues/202", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking", ], url: "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdk-pixbuf/-/issues/202", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org", vulnStatus: "Modified", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-787", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-787", }, ], source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", type: "Secondary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.