FKIE_CVE-2018-10767
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2018-05-06 23:29 - Updated: 2026-06-17 01:34
Severity
Summary
There is a stack-based buffer over-read in calling GLib in the function gxps_images_guess_content_type of gxps-images.c in libgxps through 0.3.0 because it does not reject negative return values from a g_input_stream_read call. A crafted input will lead to a remote denial of service attack.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| cve@mitre.org | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327 | Third Party Advisory | |
| cve@mitre.org | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3140 | Third Party Advisory | |
| cve@mitre.org | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 | Third Party Advisory | |
| cve@mitre.org | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575188 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327 | Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3140 | Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 | Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575188 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnome | libgxps | * | |
| redhat | ansible_tower | 3.3 | |
| redhat | enterprise_linux_desktop | 7.0 | |
| redhat | enterprise_linux_server | 7.0 | |
| redhat | enterprise_linux_workstation | 7.0 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:gnome:libgxps:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "26C6A5A1-E85A-4A37-AF7F-E2C2E6F5D0BF",
"versionEndIncluding": "0.3.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:ansible_tower:3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A5319543-0143-4E2E-AA77-B7F116C1336C",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "33C068A4-3780-4EAB-A937-6082DF847564",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "51EF4996-72F4-4FA4-814F-F5991E7A8318",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "825ECE2D-E232-46E0-A047-074B34DB1E97",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "There is a stack-based buffer over-read in calling GLib in the function gxps_images_guess_content_type of gxps-images.c in libgxps through 0.3.0 because it does not reject negative return values from a g_input_stream_read call. A crafted input will lead to a remote denial of service attack."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Hay una sobrelectura de b\u00fafer basada en pila en la llamada a GLib en la funci\u00f3n gxps_images_guess_content_type de gxps-images.c en libgxps hasta la versi\u00f3n 0.3.0 debido a que no rechaza los valores de retorno de una llamada g_input_stream_read. Se podr\u00eda realizar un ataque de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio remoto con una entrada especialmente manipulada."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2018-10767",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T01:34:38.700",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2018-05-06T23:29:00.237",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3140"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575188"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3140"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575188"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…