fkie_cve-2016-0791
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2016-04-07 23:59
Modified
2024-11-21 02:42
Severity ?
Summary
Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 do not use a constant-time algorithm to verify CSRF tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force approach.
References
Impacted products
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift:3.1:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F8E35FAB-695F-44DA-945D-60B47C1F200B",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:jenkins:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "18F2C087-76F7-40F2-83DA-4C643363629C",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.649",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:jenkins:1.642.1:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8B87EA57-C12B-4329-B969-2867803D0BA0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 do not use a constant-time algorithm to verify CSRF tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force approach."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Jenkins en versiones anteriores a 1.650 y LTS en versiones anteriores a 1.642.2 no utiliza un algoritmo de tiempo constante para verificar tokens CSRF, lo que hace m\u00e1s f\u00e1cil para atacantes remotos eludir el mecanismo de protecci\u00f3n CSRF a trav\u00e9s de una aproximaci\u00f3n por fuerza bruta."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2016-0791",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:42:23.403",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2016-04-07T23:59:02.863",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1773.html"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0711"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/SECURITY/Jenkins+Security+Advisory+2016-02-24"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1773.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0711"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/SECURITY/Jenkins+Security+Advisory+2016-02-24"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.