fkie_cve-2011-0019
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2011-02-23 19:00
Modified
2024-11-21 01:23
Severity ?
Summary
slapd (aka ns-slapd) in 389 Directory Server 1.2.7.5 (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x or dirsrv) does not properly handle simple paged result searches, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via multiple search requests.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
fedoraproject | 389_directory_server | 1.2.7.5 | |
redhat | directory_server | 8.2 | |
redhat | directory_server | 8.2.3 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:fedoraproject:389_directory_server:1.2.7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "17C879AE-7435-43F5-94E5-A7ED84E46D0F", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:8.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "EDC61481-16C5-44EF-AA40-8423A40B2581", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:8.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "C92B4226-6D3D-4430-A753-92E828FBBB8C", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "slapd (aka ns-slapd) in 389 Directory Server 1.2.7.5 (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x or dirsrv) does not properly handle simple paged result searches, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via multiple search requests." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "slapd (tambi\u00e9n conocido como ns-slapd) en 389 Directory Server v1.2.7.5 (tambi\u00e9n conocido como Red Hat Directory Server v8.2.x o dirsrv) no gestiona correctamente las consultas paginadas simples, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (ca\u00edda de demonio) o posiblemente tengan un impacto no especificado a trav\u00e9s de peticiones de b\u00fasqueda m\u00faltiples." } ], "id": "CVE-2011-0019", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:23:08.203", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 7.5, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ] }, "published": "2011-02-23T19:00:01.670", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0293.html" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46489" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025102" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666076" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670914" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0293.html" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46489" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025102" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666076" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670914" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-20" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.