GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-47155 (GCVE-0-2026-47155)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-22 22:20 – Updated: 2026-06-23 12:35
VLAI
Title
vLLM: Artifact Pin Decay in vLLM allows pinned deployments to load unpinned code, weights, and processors
Summary
vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.0, vLLM's revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies --revision or --code-revision can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision. This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-06-23 12:34 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
vllm-project vllm Affected: < 0.22.0
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-47155",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-06-23T12:34:39.566846Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T12:35:39.739Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "vllm",
          "vendor": "vllm-project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.22.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.0, vLLM\u0027s revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies --revision or --code-revision can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision. This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-345",
              "description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T22:20:10.793Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/42616",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/42616"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/d26a28ab033697f55a1414b5b0435de7cd6045b6",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/d26a28ab033697f55a1414b5b0435de7cd6045b6"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://huntr.com/bounties/3f1e24c0-87d2-4f6c-a705-820f380879ac",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/3f1e24c0-87d2-4f6c-a705-820f380879ac"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "vLLM: Artifact Pin Decay in vLLM allows pinned deployments to load unpinned code, weights, and processors"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-47155",
    "datePublished": "2026-06-22T22:20:10.793Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-18T21:25:34.496Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T12:35:39.739Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-47155",
      "date": "2026-09-13",
      "epss": "0.00249",
      "percentile": "0.16326"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-47155\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-06-22T23:16:30.357\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-24T16:49:17.960\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.0, vLLM\u0027s revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies --revision or --code-revision can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision. This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"vllm-project\",\"product\":\"vllm\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 0.22.0\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":4.2}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-06-23T12:34:39.566846Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-47155\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-345\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:vllm:vllm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.22.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"981922E2-F268-4829-9CDE-3A165F3808B9\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/d26a28ab033697f55a1414b5b0435de7cd6045b6\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/42616\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://huntr.com/bounties/3f1e24c0-87d2-4f6c-a705-820f380879ac\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-09-03T00:16:12+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-47155",
      "id": "CVE-2026-47155",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-06-22T22:20:10.793000+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "14",
      "product_status:known_affected": "9",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "5",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "vllm: vLLM: Supply-chain integrity issue due to inconsistent revision pinning controls",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-47155.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-47155\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-23T12:34:39.566846Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-23T12:35:33.893Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"vLLM: Artifact Pin Decay in vLLM allows pinned deployments to load unpinned code, weights, and processors\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"vllm-project\", \"product\": \"vllm\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 0.22.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/42616\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/42616\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/d26a28ab033697f55a1414b5b0435de7cd6045b6\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/d26a28ab033697f55a1414b5b0435de7cd6045b6\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://huntr.com/bounties/3f1e24c0-87d2-4f6c-a705-820f380879ac\", \"name\": \"https://huntr.com/bounties/3f1e24c0-87d2-4f6c-a705-820f380879ac\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.0, vLLM\u0027s revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies --revision or --code-revision can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision. This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-345\", \"description\": \"CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-22T22:20:10.793Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-47155\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-23T12:35:39.739Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-18T21:25:34.496Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-22T22:20:10.793Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.