CVE-2026-12383 (GCVE-0-2026-12383)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-27 19:12 – Updated: 2026-07-27 19:32
VLAI
Title
Eda-server: externaleventstreamviewset trusts subject header without validation and leaks expected dn
Summary
A flaw was found in the Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) server. The ExternalEventStreamViewSet uses permissive access controls (permission_classes=[AllowAny], authentication_classes=[]) and relies solely on the Subject HTTP header value for mTLS authentication without verifying that the header originated from a trusted proxy. Additionally, the expected certificate Distinguished Name is leaked in the 403 error response body. An attacker who can reach the EDA API endpoint with a spoofed Subject header can inject arbitrary events into mTLS-protected event streams, triggering downstream automation actions.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
URL Tags
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12383 vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489127 issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2     cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-07-27 19:04
Credits
This issue was discovered by Chris Meyers (Red Hat).
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-12383",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-27T19:31:53.427622Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T19:32:02.421Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-27/eda-controller-rhel9",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "automation-eda-controller",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This issue was discovered by Chris Meyers (Red Hat)."
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-07-27T19:04:53.794Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A flaw was found in the Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) server. The ExternalEventStreamViewSet uses permissive access controls (permission_classes=[AllowAny], authentication_classes=[]) and relies solely on the Subject HTTP header value for mTLS authentication without verifying that the header originated from a trusted proxy. Additionally, the expected certificate Distinguished Name is leaked in the 403 error response body. An attacker who can reach the EDA API endpoint with a spoofed Subject header can inject arbitrary events into mTLS-protected event streams, triggering downstream automation actions."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
              "value": "Important"
            },
            "type": "Red Hat severity rating"
          }
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-345",
              "description": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T19:12:29.271Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_REDHAT"
          ],
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12383"
        },
        {
          "name": "RHBZ#2489127",
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking",
            "x_refsource_REDHAT"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489127"
        }
      ],
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-06-16T10:09:09.069Z",
          "value": "Reported to Red Hat."
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-07-27T19:04:53.794Z",
          "value": "Made public."
        }
      ],
      "title": "Eda-server: externaleventstreamviewset trusts subject header without validation and leaks expected dn",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The following practices would help for avoiding exposure and mitigate this flaw:\n\n- Ensure the EDA server is not directly accessible from untrusted networks; all traffic should route through the AAP Gateway which should perform mTLS validation.\n- If possible, configure network-level access controls to restrict which source IPs can reach the EDA backend API.\n- Monitor EDA event streams for unexpected events_received counter changes.\n- Review and rotate mTLS client certificates if unauthorized access is suspected, as the expected DN may have been leaked via the 403 error response."
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
      },
      "x_redhatCweChain": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-12383",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-27T19:12:29.271Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-06-16T10:07:26.251Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T19:32:02.421Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-12383",
      "date": "2026-07-29",
      "epss": "0.00128",
      "percentile": "0.02822"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-12383\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2026-07-27T19:17:14.820\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-27T20:37:16.927\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A flaw was found in the Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) server. The ExternalEventStreamViewSet uses permissive access controls (permission_classes=[AllowAny], authentication_classes=[]) and relies solely on the Subject HTTP header value for mTLS authentication without verifying that the header originated from a trusted proxy. Additionally, the expected certificate Distinguished Name is leaked in the 403 error response body. An attacker who can reach the EDA API endpoint with a spoofed Subject header can inject arbitrary events into mTLS-protected event streams, triggering downstream automation actions.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Red Hat\",\"product\":\"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2\",\"defaultStatus\":\"affected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/\",\"packageName\":\"ansible-automation-platform-27/eda-controller-rhel9\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2\"]},{\"vendor\":\"Red Hat\",\"product\":\"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2\",\"defaultStatus\":\"affected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/\",\"packageName\":\"automation-eda-controller\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2\"]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-07-27T19:31:53.427622Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-12383\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-345\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12383\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489127\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-27T20:05:36+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-12383",
      "id": "CVE-2026-12383",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-07-27T19:04:53.794000+00:00",
      "product_status:known_affected": "2",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "eda-server: ExternalEventStreamViewSet trusts Subject header without validation and leaks expected DN",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-12383.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-12383\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-27T19:31:53.427622Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-27T19:31:55.988Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Eda-server: externaleventstreamviewset trusts subject header without validation and leaks expected dn\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"This issue was discovered by Chris Meyers (Red Hat).\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"Red Hat severity rating\", \"content\": {\"value\": \"Important\", \"namespace\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/\"}}}, {\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2\"], \"vendor\": \"Red Hat\", \"product\": \"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2\", \"packageName\": \"ansible-automation-platform-27/eda-controller-rhel9\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/\", \"defaultStatus\": \"affected\"}, {\"cpes\": [\"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2\"], \"vendor\": \"Red Hat\", \"product\": \"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2\", \"packageName\": \"automation-eda-controller\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/\", \"defaultStatus\": \"affected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-06-16T10:09:09.069Z\", \"value\": \"Reported to Red Hat.\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-07-27T19:04:53.794Z\", \"value\": \"Made public.\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-07-27T19:04:53.794Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12383\", \"tags\": [\"vdb-entry\", \"x_refsource_REDHAT\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489127\", \"name\": \"RHBZ#2489127\", \"tags\": [\"issue-tracking\", \"x_refsource_REDHAT\"]}], \"workarounds\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The following practices would help for avoiding exposure and mitigate this flaw:\\n\\n- Ensure the EDA server is not directly accessible from untrusted networks; all traffic should route through the AAP Gateway which should perform mTLS validation.\\n- If possible, configure network-level access controls to restrict which source IPs can reach the EDA backend API.\\n- Monitor EDA event streams for unexpected events_received counter changes.\\n- Review and rotate mTLS client certificates if unauthorized access is suspected, as the expected DN may have been leaked via the 403 error response.\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cvelib 1.8.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A flaw was found in the Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) server. The ExternalEventStreamViewSet uses permissive access controls (permission_classes=[AllowAny], authentication_classes=[]) and relies solely on the Subject HTTP header value for mTLS authentication without verifying that the header originated from a trusted proxy. Additionally, the expected certificate Distinguished Name is leaked in the 403 error response body. An attacker who can reach the EDA API endpoint with a spoofed Subject header can inject arbitrary events into mTLS-protected event streams, triggering downstream automation actions.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-345\", \"description\": \"Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"shortName\": \"redhat\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-27T19:12:29.271Z\"}, \"x_redhatCweChain\": \"CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity\"}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-12383\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-27T19:32:02.421Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-16T10:07:26.251Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-27T19:12:29.271Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"redhat\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…