CNVD-2017-10694

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-06-22
VLAI
Title
Red Hat 389-ds-base远程拒绝服务漏洞
Description
Red Hat 389-ds-base是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司的针对Linux的企业级开源LDAP服务器。它通过现实世界的使用而强化,功能齐全,支持多主复制,并且已经处理了世界上许多最大的LDAP部署。 Red Hat 389-ds-base存在远程拒绝服务漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞造成受影响应用程序崩溃,导致拒绝服务。
Severity
中
Patch Name
Red Hat 389-ds-base远程拒绝服务漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
Red Hat 389-ds-base是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司的针对Linux的企业级开源LDAP服务器。它通过现实世界的使用而强化,功能齐全,支持多主复制,并且已经处理了世界上许多最大的LDAP部署。 Red Hat 389-ds-base存在远程拒绝服务漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞造成受影响应用程序崩溃,导致拒绝服务。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

用户可参考如下厂商提供的安全补丁以修复该漏洞: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436575

Reference
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97524
Impacted products
Name
Red Hat 389-ds-base
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "97524"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2017-2668"
    }
  },
  "description": "Red Hat 389-ds-base\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u9488\u5bf9Linux\u7684\u4f01\u4e1a\u7ea7\u5f00\u6e90LDAP\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u3002\u5b83\u901a\u8fc7\u73b0\u5b9e\u4e16\u754c\u7684\u4f7f\u7528\u800c\u5f3a\u5316\uff0c\u529f\u80fd\u9f50\u5168\uff0c\u652f\u6301\u591a\u4e3b\u590d\u5236\uff0c\u5e76\u4e14\u5df2\u7ecf\u5904\u7406\u4e86\u4e16\u754c\u4e0a\u8bb8\u591a\u6700\u5927\u7684LDAP\u90e8\u7f72\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat 389-ds-base\u5b58\u5728\u8fdc\u7a0b\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u53d7\u5f71\u54cd\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5d29\u6e83\uff0c\u5bfc\u81f4\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Joachim Jabs",
  "formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u53c2\u8003\u5982\u4e0b\u5382\u5546\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff1a\r\nhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436575",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-10694",
  "openTime": "2017-06-22",
  "patchDescription": "Red Hat 389-ds-base\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u9488\u5bf9Linux\u7684\u4f01\u4e1a\u7ea7\u5f00\u6e90LDAP\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u3002\u5b83\u901a\u8fc7\u73b0\u5b9e\u4e16\u754c\u7684\u4f7f\u7528\u800c\u5f3a\u5316\uff0c\u529f\u80fd\u9f50\u5168\uff0c\u652f\u6301\u591a\u4e3b\u590d\u5236\uff0c\u5e76\u4e14\u5df2\u7ecf\u5904\u7406\u4e86\u4e16\u754c\u4e0a\u8bb8\u591a\u6700\u5927\u7684LDAP\u90e8\u7f72\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat 389-ds-base\u5b58\u5728\u8fdc\u7a0b\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u53d7\u5f71\u54cd\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5d29\u6e83\uff0c\u5bfc\u81f4\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Red Hat 389-ds-base\u8fdc\u7a0b\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Red Hat 389-ds-base"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97524",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2017-05-24",
  "title": "Red Hat 389-ds-base\u8fdc\u7a0b\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…