Vulnerability-Lookup

BDU:2023-05920 (CVE-2023-4039)

Vulnerability from fstec – Published: 2023-09-21 – Updated: 2025-03-05 – View on bdu.fstec.ru Exploit publicly available Fixed

Title

Уязвимость функции защиты стека набора компиляторов для различных языков программирования GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), позволяющая нарушителю оказать воздействие на конфиденциальность, целостность и доступность защищаемой информации

Summary

Уязвимость функции защиты стека набора компиляторов для различных языков программирования GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) связана с нарушением механизма защиты данных. Эксплуатация уязвимости может позволить нарушителю, действующему удаленно, оказать воздействие на конфиденциальность, целостность и доступность защищаемой информации

Severity

4.0 (Medium) CVSS 2.0


                      
                        AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

4.8 (Medium) CVSS 3.0


                      
                        CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Class

Architecture vulnerability

Status

Confirmed by the vendor

Exploitation

Data structure manipulation

Incidents

Being clarified

Remediation

Software update

CWE

CWE-693 - Нарушение механизма защиты данных

Aliases

CVE-2023-4039

References

6 references

URL
https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vul…
https://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7…
https://vuldb.com/ru/?id.239654
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-4039
http://repo.red-soft.ru/redos/7.3c/x86_64/updates/
https://abf.rosa.ru/advisories/ROSA-SA-2024-2406

Impacted products

10 products from 5 vendors

Vendors

Red Hat, Inc., ООО «Ред Софт», АО «НТЦ ИТ РОСА», GNU General Public License

Products

Red Hat Enterprise Linux, РЕД ОС (запись в едином реестре российских программ №3751), Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers, Red Hat OpenShift Data Science (RHODS), Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, РОСА ХРОМ (запись в едином реестре российских программ №1607), Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces, GNU Compiler Collection

Versions

6 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), 7 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), 8 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), 7.3 (РЕД ОС), 2 (Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes), 3.11 (Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform), 4 (Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform), - (Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers), 9 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), - (Red Hat OpenShift Data Science (RHODS)), 4 (Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization), 12.4 (РОСА ХРОМ), - (Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces), до 2023-09-12 (GNU Compiler Collection)

Product types

Operating system, Network device, Network software, Application software, Virtualization software

Platforms

ООО «Ред Софт» РЕД ОС 7.3 (запись в едином реестре российских программ №3751), АО «НТЦ ИТ РОСА» РОСА ХРОМ 12.4 (запись в едином реестре российских программ №1607)

Mitigations

Использование рекомендаций: Для GNU Compiler Collection (GCC): https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64 Для программных продуктов Red Hat Inc.: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-4039 Для РедОС: http://repo.red-soft.ru/redos/7.3c/x86_64/updates/ Для операционной системы РОСА ХРОМ: https://abf.rosa.ru/advisories/ROSA-SA-2024-2406

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "CVSS 2.0": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
  "CVSS 3.0": "AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
  "CVSS 4.0": null,
  "remediation_\u0418\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440": null,
  "remediation_\u041d\u0430\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435": null,
  "\u0412\u0435\u043d\u0434\u043e\u0440 \u041f\u041e": "Red Hat, Inc., \u041e\u041e\u041e \u00ab\u0420\u0435\u0434 \u0421\u043e\u0444\u0442\u00bb, \u0410\u041e \u00ab\u041d\u0422\u0426 \u0418\u0422 \u0420\u041e\u0421\u0410\u00bb, GNU General Public License",
  "\u0412\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f \u041f\u041e": "6 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), 7 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), 8 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), 7.3 (\u0420\u0415\u0414 \u041e\u0421), 2 (Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes), 3.11 (Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform), 4 (Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform), - (Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers), 9 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), - (Red Hat OpenShift Data Science (RHODS)), 4 (Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization), 12.4 (\u0420\u041e\u0421\u0410 \u0425\u0420\u041e\u041c), - (Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces), \u0434\u043e 2023-09-12 (GNU Compiler Collection)",
  "\u0412\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u0440\u044b \u043f\u043e \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e": "\u0418\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0439:\n\u0414\u043b\u044f GNU Compiler Collection (GCC):\nhttps://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64\n\n\u0414\u043b\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0432 Red Hat Inc.:\nhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-4039\n\n\u0414\u043b\u044f \u0420\u0435\u0434\u041e\u0421: http://repo.red-soft.ru/redos/7.3c/x86_64/updates/\n\n\u0414\u043b\u044f \u043e\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u044b \u0420\u041e\u0421\u0410 \u0425\u0420\u041e\u041c: https://abf.rosa.ru/advisories/ROSA-SA-2024-2406",
  "\u0414\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0432\u044b\u044f\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f": "12.09.2023",
  "\u0414\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f": "05.03.2025",
  "\u0414\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438": "21.09.2023",
  "\u0418\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440": "BDU:2023-05920",
  "\u0418\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "CVE-2023-4039",
  "\u0418\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u043e\u0431 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438": "\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0430",
  "\u041a\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0441 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0440\u044b",
  "\u041d\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u041f\u041e": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux, \u0420\u0415\u0414 \u041e\u0421 (\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c \u0432 \u0435\u0434\u0438\u043d\u043e\u043c \u0440\u0435\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0435 \u0440\u043e\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0439\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c \u21163751), Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers, Red Hat OpenShift Data Science (RHODS), Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, \u0420\u041e\u0421\u0410 \u0425\u0420\u041e\u041c (\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c \u0432 \u0435\u0434\u0438\u043d\u043e\u043c \u0440\u0435\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0435 \u0440\u043e\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0439\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c \u21161607), Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces, GNU Compiler Collection",
  "\u041d\u0430\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u041e\u0421 \u0438 \u0442\u0438\u043f \u0430\u043f\u043f\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043b\u0430\u0442\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u044b": "\u041e\u041e\u041e \u00ab\u0420\u0435\u0434 \u0421\u043e\u0444\u0442\u00bb \u0420\u0415\u0414 \u041e\u0421 7.3  (\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c \u0432 \u0435\u0434\u0438\u043d\u043e\u043c \u0440\u0435\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0435 \u0440\u043e\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0439\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c \u21163751), \u0410\u041e \u00ab\u041d\u0422\u0426 \u0418\u0422 \u0420\u041e\u0421\u0410\u00bb \u0420\u041e\u0421\u0410 \u0425\u0420\u041e\u041c 12.4  (\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c \u0432 \u0435\u0434\u0438\u043d\u043e\u043c \u0440\u0435\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0435 \u0440\u043e\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0439\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c \u21161607)",
  "\u041d\u0430\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0444\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u044b \u0441\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u0438\u043b\u044f\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043b\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u044f\u0437\u044b\u043a\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0449\u0430\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044e \u043e\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0444\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c, \u0446\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0449\u0430\u0435\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438",
  "\u041d\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0447\u0438\u0435 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442\u0430": "\u0421\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0435\u0442 \u0432 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0440\u044b\u0442\u043e\u043c \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0435",
  "\u041e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 CWE": "\u041d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u044b \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 (CWE-693)",
  "\u041e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0444\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u044b \u0441\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u0438\u043b\u044f\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043b\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u044f\u0437\u044b\u043a\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u0441 \u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u044b \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445. \u042d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0443\u0430\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044e, \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0435\u043c\u0443 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e, \u043e\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0444\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c, \u0446\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0449\u0430\u0435\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438",
  "\u041f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u044f \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0443\u0430\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": null,
  "\u041f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f": null,
  "\u0421\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u0441 \u0438\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0418\u0411": "\u0414\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0443\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f",
  "\u0421\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u041e\u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0430",
  "\u0421\u043f\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0431 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f": "\u041e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f",
  "\u0421\u043f\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0431 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0443\u0430\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438": "\u041c\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043f\u0443\u043b\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0443\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0440\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445",
  "\u0421\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64\nhttps://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7ch-h5rf-w2mf\nhttps://vuldb.com/ru/?id.239654\nhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-4039\nhttp://repo.red-soft.ru/redos/7.3c/x86_64/updates/\nhttps://abf.rosa.ru/advisories/ROSA-SA-2024-2406",
  "\u0421\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0443\u0441 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u041f\u043e\u0434\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043c",
  "\u0422\u0438\u043f \u041f\u041e": "\u041e\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u0430, \u0421\u0435\u0442\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0435 \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u0421\u0435\u0442\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u041f\u0440\u0438\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u041f\u041e \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c, \u041f\u041e \u0432\u0438\u0440\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438/\u041f\u041e \u0432\u0438\u0440\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c\u043d\u043e-\u0430\u043f\u043f\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430",
  "\u0422\u0438\u043f \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 CWE": "CWE-693",
  "\u0423\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043d\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u0421\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0443\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043d\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 (\u0431\u0430\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u044f \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u0430 CVSS 2.0 \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442 4)\n\u0421\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0443\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043d\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 (\u0431\u0430\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u044f \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u0430 CVSS 3.0 \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442 4,8)"
}

CVE-2023-4039 (GCVE-0-2023-4039)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-09-13 08:05 – Updated: 2026-06-23 17:19 Disputed

Title

GCC's-fstack-protector fails to guard dynamically-sized local variables on AArch64

Summary

**DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself.

Severity

4.8 (Medium)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

SSVC

Exploitation: poc Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2025-06-03 16:04 UTC

CWE

CWE-693 - Protection Mechanism Failure

Assigner

Arm mitre root

References

2 references

URL	Tags
https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center…
https://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosur…

Impacted products

2 products

Vendor	Product	Version
Arm Ltd	Arm GNU Toolchain	Affected: All versions where option -fstack-protector is used
GNU	GCC	Affected: All versions of GCC that target AArch64 when option -fstack-protector is used

Date Public

2023-09-12 09:00

Credits

Tom Hebb from Meta Red Team X and Maria Markstedter from Azeria Labs

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:17:11.837Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7ch-h5rf-w2mf"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2023-4039",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-06-03T16:04:55.934999Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T17:19:09.321Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Arm GNU Toolchain",
          "vendor": "Arm Ltd",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All versions where option -fstack-protector is used"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "GCC",
          "vendor": "GNU",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All versions of GCC that target AArch64 when option -fstack-protector is used"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "The specific conditions where the stack-protector fails to give the desired level of protection are when:\n\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n    \u003cli\u003eusing GCC (all unpatched versions) targeting AArch64\u003c/li\u003e\n    \u003cli\u003eand when the -fstack-protector option is used\u003c/li\u003e\n    \u003cli\u003eand when the program uses C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or alloca()\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnd to be exploitable there must also be a prior vulnerability in the\n program such that an attacker can cause a buffer overflow in these \nlocal variables that overwrites saved register values in the stack.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The specific conditions where the stack-protector fails to give the desired level of protection are when:\n\n\n\n      *  using GCC (all unpatched versions) targeting AArch64\n\n      *  and when the -fstack-protector option is used\n\n      *  and when the program uses C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or alloca()\n\n\n\n\nAnd to be exploitable there must also be a prior vulnerability in the\n program such that an attacker can cause a buffer overflow in these \nlocal variables that overwrites saved register values in the stack."
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Tom Hebb from Meta Red Team X and Maria Markstedter from Azeria Labs"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2023-09-12T09:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e**DISPUTED** A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains \nthat target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer \noverflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application \nwithout this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies \nto C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using \nalloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized \nlocal variables.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe default behavior when the stack-protector \ndetects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in \ncontrolled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer \noverflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change \nprogram flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to\n go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "**DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains \nthat target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer \noverflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application \nwithout this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies \nto C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using \nalloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized \nlocal variables.\n\nThe default behavior when the stack-protector \ndetects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in \ncontrolled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer \noverflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change \nprogram flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to\n go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.8,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-693",
              "description": "CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-06-13T22:20:07.881Z",
        "orgId": "56a131ea-b967-4a0d-a41e-5f3549952846",
        "shortName": "Arm"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7ch-h5rf-w2mf"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Recompile vulnerable code using an updated toolchain.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Recompile vulnerable code using an updated toolchain."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ],
      "title": "GCC\u0027s-fstack-protector fails to guard dynamically-sized local variables on AArch64",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      },
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "arm-security@arm.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2023-4039",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Arm GNU Toolchain",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "All versions of GCC that target AArch64 when option -fstack-protector is used"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "Arm Ltd"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "5.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "**DISPUTED** A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "GCC\u0027s-fstack-protector fails to guard dynamically-sized local variables on AArch64"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "56a131ea-b967-4a0d-a41e-5f3549952846",
    "assignerShortName": "Arm",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-4039",
    "datePublished": "2023-09-13T08:05:10.274Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-08-01T10:38:03.032Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T17:19:09.321Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.