CVE-2026-90651 (GCVE-0-2026-90651)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-12 23:55 – Updated: 2026-09-12 23:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Socket Firewall (socketdev/socket-registry-firewall) in registry mode before 2.0.0 does not verify upstream TLS certificates by default. When the api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify configuration keys are omitted from socket.yml, the generated configuration sets SOCKET_API_SSL_VERIFY='false' and UPSTREAM_SSL_VERIFY='false', and the OpenResty/Lua HTTP client used for outbound requests accepts any certificate, including self-signed and otherwise untrusted certificates, without validating the chain. An attacker positioned to intercept traffic between Socket Firewall and the Socket API or an upstream package registry can present a crafted certificate and modify responses in transit, including substituting malicious package content or altering the allow/block decisions the firewall enforces. Setting api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true enables verification; however, in versions before 1.1.334, the generated nginx configuration did not emit lua_ssl_trusted_certificate, and thus verification could not be used successfully without manually patching the generated configuration. Version 2.0.0 changes the default for both settings to true.
Severity
8.1 (High)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | Socket Firewall |
Affected:
0 , < 2.0.0
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://hub.docker.com",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"registry mode; outbound TLS to Socket API and upstream package registries (OpenResty/Lua HTTP client)"
],
"packageName": "socketdev/socket-registry-firewall",
"product": "Socket Firewall",
"vendor": "Socket",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Socket Firewall (socketdev/socket-registry-firewall) in registry mode before 2.0.0 does not verify upstream TLS certificates by default. When the api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify configuration keys are omitted from socket.yml, the generated configuration sets SOCKET_API_SSL_VERIFY=\u0027false\u0027 and UPSTREAM_SSL_VERIFY=\u0027false\u0027, and the OpenResty/Lua HTTP client used for outbound requests accepts any certificate, including self-signed and otherwise untrusted certificates, without validating the chain. An attacker positioned to intercept traffic between Socket Firewall and the Socket API or an upstream package registry can present a crafted certificate and modify responses in transit, including substituting malicious package content or altering the allow/block decisions the firewall enforces. Setting api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true enables verification; however, in versions before 1.1.334, the generated nginx configuration did not emit lua_ssl_trusted_certificate, and thus verification could not be used successfully without manually patching the generated configuration. Version 2.0.0 changes the default for both settings to true."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-12T23:55:41.065Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/SocketDev/socket-registry-firewall/releases/tag/v2.0.0"
},
{
"url": "https://docs.socket.dev/docs/registry-mode-configuration-reference"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 251)\"\u003eUpgrade to Socket Firewall 2.0.0 or later, where api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify default to true. Deployments that terminate TLS on an internal proxy or use a private CA must supply that CA via api_ssl_ca_cert / upstream_ssl_ca_cert, or explicitly disable verification for those connections.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Upgrade to Socket Firewall 2.0.0 or later, where api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify default to true. Deployments that terminate TLS on an internal proxy or use a private CA must supply that CA via api_ssl_ca_cert / upstream_ssl_ca_cert, or explicitly disable verification for those connections."
}
],
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 251)\"\u003eOn versions 1.1.334 through 1.1.x, explicitly set api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true in socket.yml. On versions before 1.1.334 this setting alone is not sufficient, because the generated nginx configuration omits lua_ssl_trusted_certificate; operators had to patch the generated configuration to inject lua_ssl_trusted_certificate and lua_ssl_verify_depth.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "On versions 1.1.334 through 1.1.x, explicitly set api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true in socket.yml. On versions before 1.1.334 this setting alone is not sufficient, because the generated nginx configuration omits lua_ssl_trusted_certificate; operators had to patch the generated configuration to inject lua_ssl_trusted_certificate and lua_ssl_verify_depth."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "CVE-Request-form 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-90651",
"datePublished": "2026-09-12T23:55:41.065Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-12T23:55:40.704Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-12T23:55:41.065Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-90651\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2026-09-13T00:17:07.203\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-09-13T00:17:07.203\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Socket Firewall (socketdev/socket-registry-firewall) in registry mode before 2.0.0 does not verify upstream TLS certificates by default. When the api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify configuration keys are omitted from socket.yml, the generated configuration sets SOCKET_API_SSL_VERIFY=\u0027false\u0027 and UPSTREAM_SSL_VERIFY=\u0027false\u0027, and the OpenResty/Lua HTTP client used for outbound requests accepts any certificate, including self-signed and otherwise untrusted certificates, without validating the chain. An attacker positioned to intercept traffic between Socket Firewall and the Socket API or an upstream package registry can present a crafted certificate and modify responses in transit, including substituting malicious package content or altering the allow/block decisions the firewall enforces. Setting api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true enables verification; however, in versions before 1.1.334, the generated nginx configuration did not emit lua_ssl_trusted_certificate, and thus verification could not be used successfully without manually patching the generated configuration. Version 2.0.0 changes the default for both settings to true.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Socket\",\"product\":\"Socket Firewall\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://hub.docker.com\",\"packageName\":\"socketdev/socket-registry-firewall\",\"modules\":[\"registry mode; outbound TLS to Socket API and upstream package registries (OpenResty/Lua HTTP client)\"],\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"2.0.0\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L\",\"baseScore\":8.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.3}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://docs.socket.dev/docs/registry-mode-configuration-reference\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/SocketDev/socket-registry-firewall/releases/tag/v2.0.0\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…