CVE-2026-10860 (GCVE-0-2026-10860)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-04 13:34 – Updated: 2026-06-11 13:24
VLAI
Title
MISP CRUDComponent delete validation bypass via operator precedence error
Summary
A logic error in the MISP CRUD component delete handler allowed validation failures to be bypassed when requests used the HTTP DELETE method. Due to missing parentheses in the delete condition, the expression was evaluated as ($validationError === null && POST) || DELETE, meaning a DELETE request could proceed even when the delete validation callback had rejected the operation. An authenticated attacker with access to an affected delete endpoint could abuse this flaw to delete records that should have been protected by application-level validation or authorization checks.
Severity
7.9 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
misp misp Affected: 0 , ≤ 2.5.38 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
🕵️‍♂️ Jeroen Pinoy 🐞 Andras Iklody (the Insomniac MISP lead dev) Fase Rais Baradika
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-10860",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-06-04T17:12:22.589498Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T17:16:34.986Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "misp",
          "vendor": "misp",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.5.38",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Andras Iklody"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Fase Rais Baradika"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "A logic error in the MISP CRUD component delete handler allowed validation failures to be bypassed when requests used the HTTP DELETE method. Due to missing parentheses in the delete condition, the expression was evaluated as \u003ccode\u003e($validationError === null \u0026amp;\u0026amp; POST) || DELETE\u003c/code\u003e, meaning a DELETE request could proceed even when the delete validation callback had rejected the operation. An authenticated attacker with access to an affected delete endpoint could abuse this flaw to delete records that should have been protected by application-level validation or authorization checks."
            }
          ],
          "value": "A logic error in the MISP CRUD component delete handler allowed validation failures to be bypassed when requests used the HTTP DELETE method. Due to missing parentheses in the delete condition, the expression was evaluated as ($validationError === null \u0026\u0026 POST) || DELETE, meaning a DELETE request could proceed even when the delete validation callback had rejected the operation. An authenticated attacker with access to an affected delete endpoint could abuse this flaw to delete records that should have been protected by application-level validation or authorization checks."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-122",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-122 Privilege Abuse"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-87",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-87 Forceful Browsing"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 7.9,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-863",
              "description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T13:24:54.103Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/a5877559dc88ad7a0c935910a652c130489ae2bd"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "MISP CRUDComponent delete validation bypass via operator precedence error",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-10860",
    "datePublished": "2026-06-04T13:34:27.444Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-06-04T13:25:04.022Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T13:24:54.103Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-10860",
      "date": "2026-08-06",
      "epss": "0.00197",
      "percentile": "0.09628"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-10860\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\",\"published\":\"2026-06-04T15:16:49.433\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-22T20:10:00.127\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A logic error in the MISP CRUD component delete handler allowed validation failures to be bypassed when requests used the HTTP DELETE method. Due to missing parentheses in the delete condition, the expression was evaluated as ($validationError === null \u0026\u0026 POST) || DELETE, meaning a DELETE request could proceed even when the delete validation callback had rejected the operation. An authenticated attacker with access to an affected delete endpoint could abuse this flaw to delete records that should have been protected by application-level validation or authorization checks.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Un error l\u00f3gico en el gestor de eliminaci\u00f3n del componente CRUD de MISP permit\u00eda eludir fallos de validaci\u00f3n cuando las solicitudes utilizaban el m\u00e9todo HTTP DELETE. Debido a la falta de par\u00e9ntesis en la condici\u00f3n de eliminaci\u00f3n, la expresi\u00f3n se evaluaba como ($validationError === null \u0026\u0026 POST) || DELETE, lo que significaba que una solicitud DELETE pod\u00eda continuar incluso cuando la devoluci\u00f3n de llamada de validaci\u00f3n de eliminaci\u00f3n hab\u00eda rechazado la operaci\u00f3n. Un atacante autenticado con acceso a un punto final de eliminaci\u00f3n afectado pod\u00eda abusar de esta vulnerabilidad para eliminar registros que deber\u00edan haber estado protegidos por validaciones o comprobaciones de autorizaci\u00f3n a nivel de aplicaci\u00f3n.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"misp\",\"product\":\"misp\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"2.5.38\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":7.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-06-04T17:12:22.589498Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-10860\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-863\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:misp-project:misp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.5.39\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F36ADE45-6CDA-466B-B002-321EA1414EB4\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/a5877559dc88ad7a0c935910a652c130489ae2bd\",\"source\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-06-05T19:18:55+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-10860",
      "id": "CVE-2026-10860",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "MISP CRUDComponent delete validation bypass via operator precedence error",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-10860.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-10860\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-04T17:12:22.589498Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-04T17:16:30.678Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"MISP CRUDComponent delete validation bypass via operator precedence error\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Jeroen Pinoy\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Andras Iklody\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Fase Rais Baradika\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-122\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-122 Privilege Abuse\"}]}, {\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-87\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-87 Forceful Browsing\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 7.9, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"misp\", \"product\": \"misp\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"2.5.38\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/a5877559dc88ad7a0c935910a652c130489ae2bd\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A logic error in the MISP CRUD component delete handler allowed validation failures to be bypassed when requests used the HTTP DELETE method. Due to missing parentheses in the delete condition, the expression was evaluated as ($validationError === null \u0026\u0026 POST) || DELETE, meaning a DELETE request could proceed even when the delete validation callback had rejected the operation. An authenticated attacker with access to an affected delete endpoint could abuse this flaw to delete records that should have been protected by application-level validation or authorization checks.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"A logic error in the MISP CRUD component delete handler allowed validation failures to be bypassed when requests used the HTTP DELETE method. Due to missing parentheses in the delete condition, the expression was evaluated as \u003ccode\u003e($validationError === null \u0026amp;\u0026amp; POST) || DELETE\u003c/code\u003e, meaning a DELETE request could proceed even when the delete validation callback had rejected the operation. An authenticated attacker with access to an affected delete endpoint could abuse this flaw to delete records that should have been protected by application-level validation or authorization checks.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-863\", \"description\": \"CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\", \"shortName\": \"CIRCL\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-11T13:24:54.103Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-10860\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-11T13:24:54.103Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-04T13:25:04.022Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-04T13:34:27.444Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"CIRCL\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.