CWE-862
Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
14839 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-5FQ6-9G2X-QXJ3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-07 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in Saad Iqbal Advanced File Manager allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Advanced File Manager: from n/a through 5.3.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-47688"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-07T15:16:20Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Saad Iqbal Advanced File Manager allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Advanced File Manager: from n/a through 5.3.1.",
"id": "GHSA-5fq6-9g2x-qxj3",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:05Z",
"published": "2025-05-07T15:31:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-47688"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/file-manager-advanced/vulnerability/wordpress-advanced-file-manager-plugin-5-3-1-broken-access-control-to-notice-dismissal-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5FRQ-M9MF-R3G2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-31 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Missing Authorization vulnerability in merkulove Headinger for Elementor allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Headinger for Elementor: from n/a through 1.1.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-66153"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-31T19:15:44Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in merkulove Headinger for Elementor allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Headinger for Elementor: from n/a through 1.1.4.",
"id": "GHSA-5frq-m9mf-r3g2",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:30Z",
"published": "2025-12-31T21:30:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/headinger-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-headinger-for-elementor-plugin-1-1-4-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/headinger-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-headinger-for-elementor-plugin-1-1-4-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5FRW-R2FH-CMVG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-05 12:31 – Updated: 2025-03-05 12:31The Lafka - Multi Store Burger - Pizza & Food Delivery WooCommerce Theme theme for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access due to a missing capability check on the 'lafka_import_lafka' AJAX actions in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to import demo data that overrides the site.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-13811"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-05T10:15:17Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Lafka - Multi Store Burger - Pizza \u0026 Food Delivery WooCommerce Theme theme for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access due to a missing capability check on the \u0027lafka_import_lafka\u0027 AJAX actions in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to import demo data that overrides the site.",
"id": "GHSA-5frw-r2fh-cmvg",
"modified": "2025-03-05T12:31:11Z",
"published": "2025-03-05T12:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13811"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://themeforest.net/item/lafka-fast-food-restaurant-woocommerce-theme/23969682"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/50d60e4f-7680-4ec0-9183-bdc8439679db?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5FVG-H778-JJJX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-19 19:00 – Updated: 2022-12-16 17:27Katalon Plugin 1.0.32 and earlier does not perform permission checks in several HTTP endpoints.
This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
Katalon Plugin 1.0.33 properly performs permission checks when accessing the affected HTTP endpoints.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:katalon"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.33"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-43417"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-19T21:24:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-19T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Katalon Plugin 1.0.32 and earlier does not perform permission checks in several HTTP endpoints.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.\n\nKatalon Plugin 1.0.33 properly performs permission checks when accessing the affected HTTP endpoints.",
"id": "GHSA-5fvg-h778-jjjx",
"modified": "2022-12-16T17:27:51Z",
"published": "2022-10-19T19:00:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43417"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/katalon-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2022-10-19/#SECURITY-2845%20(1)"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/10/19/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Missing permission checks in Jenkins Katalon Plugin allow capturing credentials"
}
GHSA-5FXQ-QCF3-244W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-14 16:33 – Updated: 2026-06-09 10:25Summary
Portainer enforces seven EndpointSecuritySettings restrictions that administrators configure to restrict the container configurations non-admin users can launch: privileged mode, host PID namespace, device mapping, capabilities, sysctls, security-opt (Seccomp / AppArmor), and bind mounts.
The vulnerability is exposed when a non-admin Portainer user (Standard User role, or any role granted endpoint-level access) has been given access to a Docker Swarm endpoint via Portainer RBAC. Admins and users without Swarm endpoint access are not affected.
These restrictions are enforced on the standard container creation path, but several of them are not applied on the Docker Swarm service API:
POST /services/create— 1 of 7 checks applied.CapabilityAdd,CapabilityDrop,Sysctls, andPrivileges(Seccomp / AppArmor) are not parsed from the request body and are forwarded to the Docker daemon without validation.POST /services/{id}/update— 0 of 7 checks applied. The route dispatches to the genericrestrictedResourceOperation, which validates RBAC ownership but does not inspect the request body or callfetchEndpointSecuritySettings().
The EndpointSecuritySettings checks apply when the administrator has configured any of AllowContainerCapabilitiesForRegularUsers, AllowSysctlSettingForRegularUsers, AllowSecurityOptForRegularUsers, or AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers to restrict standard users.
A regular user with access to a Docker Swarm endpoint can:
- Create a service with
CapabilityAdd: ["SYS_ADMIN", "NET_ADMIN", "SYS_PTRACE", …]orPrivileges.Seccomp.Mode: "unconfined". - Create a benign service that passes ownership checks, then update it to add
CapabilityAdd: ["ALL"]plus a bind mount of/, scale to one replica, and access the host filesystem from the running container (e.g. viachroot /host).
In addition, the partial Mounts[] struct used by the bind-mount check inspects only the top-level Type field. A mount with Type: "volume" and VolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Options: {type: "none", o: "bind", device: "<host path>"} is forwarded to the Docker daemon unchanged; the local volume driver then materialises it as a bind-equivalent mount, bypassing AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers. The same field path is accepted by the standalone POST /volumes/create endpoint, which never had any AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers check on any branch.
This undermines the administrator's configured security policy on Swarm-enabled endpoints.
Affected Versions
The vulnerability exists in every Portainer release with Docker Swarm support — the service-creation path has never checked CapabilityAdd, CapabilityDrop, Sysctls, or Privileges, and the service-update path has never performed any EndpointSecuritySettings validation. The VolumeOptions.DriverConfig field has never been parsed by the partial service struct on any branch, so the volume-driver-bind variant (service create/update and direct /volumes/create) shares the same affected range.
Fixes are included in the next release of each supported branch:
| Branch | First vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| 2.33.x (LTS) | 2.33.0 | 2.33.8 |
| 2.39.x (LTS) | 2.39.0 | 2.39.2 |
| 2.40.x (STS) | 2.40.0 | 2.41.0 |
Portainer LTS branches receive fixes for 6 months plus a 3-month overlap after the next LTS ships. STS releases are supported only until the next STS ships — the 2.40.x STS line ends with the 2.41.0 release. All releases prior to 2.33.0 are end-of-life and will not receive a fix; users on EOL versions should upgrade to a supported LTS branch.
Workarounds
Administrators who cannot immediately upgrade can reduce exposure with the following measures. None of these replaces the fix.
- Temporarily revoke Swarm endpoint access for non-admin users via Portainer RBAC until the patched release is deployed. This eliminates the attack surface without service disruption for administrators.
- Segregate manager and worker nodes with placement constraints so user workloads do not run on manager nodes. This limits the exposure of the Swarm control plane if the bypass is exploited against a worker.
- Block creation of local-driver volumes that use
type: none/o: bindon untrusted endpoints via a daemon-side allowlist. This closes the volume-driver-bind variant until the patched release is deployed.
Affected Code
Service creation — only Mounts inspected (1/7)
// api/http/proxy/factory/docker/services.go (pre-fix)
type PartialService struct {
TaskTemplate struct {
ContainerSpec struct {
Mounts []struct {
Type string
}
}
}
}
CapabilityAdd, CapabilityDrop, Sysctls, and Privileges are not declared in the struct, so json.Unmarshal does not include them in the validated view. The request body is then forwarded to the Docker daemon without those fields being checked.
Service update — no inspection (0/7)
// api/http/proxy/factory/docker/transport.go (pre-fix)
if match, _ := path.Match("/services/*/*", requestPath); match {
serviceID := path.Base(path.Dir(requestPath))
// ... no body inspection, no call to fetchEndpointSecuritySettings ...
return transport.restrictedResourceOperation(
request, serviceID, serviceID,
portainer.ServiceResourceControl, false,
)
}
fetchEndpointSecuritySettings() is called in three places in the codebase: container creation, service creation (bind-mount check only), and volume browsing. Service update is not among them.
Bind-mount check — driver options ignored
// api/http/proxy/factory/docker/services.go (pre-fix — partial Mounts struct)
Mounts []struct {
Type string // only this field was read
}
Because VolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Options is not declared in the partial struct, a mount of Type: "volume" passes the Type != "bind" check and is forwarded to the daemon. The local volume driver treats {type: "none", o: "bind", device: "<host path>"} as a bind-equivalent mount, so the check is bypassed.
The fix extends the partial struct to carry VolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Options map[string]string, rejects service create/update requests where that map declares a bind-style driver, and adds a new CheckVolumeBodyRestrictions invocation on POST /volumes/create (which previously had no AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers check on any branch).
Impact
An authenticated, non-admin Portainer user with access to any Docker Swarm-enabled endpoint can configure a service with:
- Elevated Linux capabilities including
CAP_SYS_ADMIN,CAP_NET_ADMIN,CAP_SYS_PTRACE, orALL— not restricted byAllowContainerCapabilitiesForRegularUsers. - Disabled syscall filtering via
Privileges.Seccomp.Mode: "unconfined"— not restricted byAllowSecurityOptForRegularUsers. - Disabled AppArmor confinement via
Privileges.AppArmor.Mode: "disabled"— not restricted byAllowSecurityOptForRegularUsers. - Arbitrary sysctl values inside the container namespace — not restricted by
AllowSysctlSettingForRegularUsers. - Bind mounts of any host path, including
/,/var/run/docker.sock, SSH keys, or Portainer's own database — not restricted byAllowBindMountsForRegularUsers. - Bind-mount-equivalent host filesystem access via volume driver options — a
Type: "volume"mount whoseVolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Optionsdescribe a local-driver bind, or a directPOST /volumes/createwith the same payload, yields the same capability as a direct bind and is not restricted byAllowBindMountsForRegularUsers.
In combination (e.g. CapabilityAdd:["ALL"] + bind mount of /), this gives a user access equivalent to root on the Swarm manager host from a restricted account, overriding the administrator's security policy.
Timeline
2026-03-12— route2shell privately discloses the volume-driver local-bind variant.2026-04-05— JohannesLks disclosure of the Swarm service create/update bypass2026-04-18— Fix merged to develop.2026-04-29— 2.41.0 released.2026-05-07— 2.39.2-LTS and 2.33.8-LTS released.
Credit
- route2shell — disclosure of the volume-driver local-bind variant on both Swarm service creation/update and the standalone
/volumes/createendpoint. - JohannesLks — independent disclosure of the Swarm service create/update bypass
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/portainer/portainer"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.33.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.33.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/portainer/portainer"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.39.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.39.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/portainer/portainer"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.40.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.41.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44849"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-14T16:33:42Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-28T22:16:58Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nPortainer enforces seven `EndpointSecuritySettings` restrictions that administrators configure to restrict the container configurations non-admin users can launch: **privileged mode**, **host PID namespace**, **device mapping**, **capabilities**, **sysctls**, **security-opt (Seccomp / AppArmor)**, and **bind mounts**.\n\nThe vulnerability is exposed when a non-admin Portainer user (Standard User role, or any role granted endpoint-level access) has been given access to a Docker Swarm endpoint via Portainer RBAC. Admins and users without Swarm endpoint access are not affected.\n\nThese restrictions are enforced on the standard container creation path, but several of them are not applied on the Docker Swarm service API:\n\n- `POST /services/create` \u2014 **1 of 7** checks applied. `CapabilityAdd`, `CapabilityDrop`, `Sysctls`, and `Privileges` (Seccomp / AppArmor) are not parsed from the request body and are forwarded to the Docker daemon without validation.\n- `POST /services/{id}/update` \u2014 **0 of 7** checks applied. The route dispatches to the generic `restrictedResourceOperation`, which validates RBAC ownership but does not inspect the request body or call `fetchEndpointSecuritySettings()`.\n\nThe `EndpointSecuritySettings` checks apply when the administrator has configured any of `AllowContainerCapabilitiesForRegularUsers`, `AllowSysctlSettingForRegularUsers`, `AllowSecurityOptForRegularUsers`, or `AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers` to restrict standard users.\n\nA regular user with access to a Docker Swarm endpoint can:\n\n- Create a service with `CapabilityAdd: [\"SYS_ADMIN\", \"NET_ADMIN\", \"SYS_PTRACE\", \u2026]` or `Privileges.Seccomp.Mode: \"unconfined\"`.\n- Create a benign service that passes ownership checks, then **update** it to add `CapabilityAdd: [\"ALL\"]` plus a bind mount of `/`, scale to one replica, and access the host filesystem from the running container (e.g. via `chroot /host`).\n\nIn addition, the partial `Mounts[]` struct used by the bind-mount check inspects only the top-level `Type` field. A mount with `Type: \"volume\"` and `VolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Options: {type: \"none\", o: \"bind\", device: \"\u003chost path\u003e\"}` is forwarded to the Docker daemon unchanged; the local volume driver then materialises it as a bind-equivalent mount, bypassing `AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers`. The same field path is accepted by the standalone `POST /volumes/create` endpoint, which never had any `AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers` check on any branch.\n\nThis undermines the administrator\u0027s configured security policy on Swarm-enabled endpoints.\n\n## Affected Versions\n\nThe vulnerability exists in every Portainer release with Docker Swarm support \u2014 the service-creation path has never checked `CapabilityAdd`, `CapabilityDrop`, `Sysctls`, or `Privileges`, and the service-update path has never performed any `EndpointSecuritySettings` validation. The `VolumeOptions.DriverConfig` field has never been parsed by the partial service struct on any branch, so the volume-driver-bind variant (service create/update and direct `/volumes/create`) shares the same affected range.\n\nFixes are included in the next release of each supported branch:\n\n| Branch | First vulnerable | Fixed in |\n|---------------------|------------------|------------|\n| 2.33.x (LTS) | 2.33.0 | **2.33.8** |\n| 2.39.x (LTS) | 2.39.0 | **2.39.2** |\n| 2.40.x (STS) | 2.40.0 | **2.41.0** |\n\nPortainer LTS branches receive fixes for 6 months plus a 3-month overlap after the next LTS ships. STS releases are supported only until the next STS ships \u2014 the 2.40.x STS line ends with the 2.41.0 release. All releases **prior to 2.33.0 are end-of-life** and will not receive a fix; users on EOL versions should upgrade to a supported LTS branch.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nAdministrators who cannot immediately upgrade can reduce exposure with the following measures. None of these replaces the fix.\n\n- **Temporarily revoke Swarm endpoint access for non-admin users** via Portainer RBAC until the patched release is deployed. This eliminates the attack surface without service disruption for administrators.\n- **Segregate manager and worker nodes** with placement constraints so user workloads do not run on manager nodes. This limits the exposure of the Swarm control plane if the bypass is exploited against a worker.\n- **Block creation of local-driver volumes that use `type: none` / `o: bind`** on untrusted endpoints via a daemon-side allowlist. This closes the volume-driver-bind variant until the patched release is deployed.\n\n## Affected Code\n\n### Service creation \u2014 only `Mounts` inspected (1/7)\n\n```go\n// api/http/proxy/factory/docker/services.go (pre-fix)\n\ntype PartialService struct {\n TaskTemplate struct {\n ContainerSpec struct {\n Mounts []struct {\n Type string\n }\n }\n }\n}\n```\n\n`CapabilityAdd`, `CapabilityDrop`, `Sysctls`, and `Privileges` are not declared in the struct, so `json.Unmarshal` does not include them in the validated view. The request body is then forwarded to the Docker daemon without those fields being checked.\n\n### Service update \u2014 no inspection (0/7)\n\n```go\n// api/http/proxy/factory/docker/transport.go (pre-fix)\n\nif match, _ := path.Match(\"/services/*/*\", requestPath); match {\n serviceID := path.Base(path.Dir(requestPath))\n // ... no body inspection, no call to fetchEndpointSecuritySettings ...\n return transport.restrictedResourceOperation(\n request, serviceID, serviceID,\n portainer.ServiceResourceControl, false,\n )\n}\n```\n\n`fetchEndpointSecuritySettings()` is called in three places in the codebase: container creation, service creation (bind-mount check only), and volume browsing. Service update is not among them.\n\n### Bind-mount check \u2014 driver options ignored\n\n```go\n// api/http/proxy/factory/docker/services.go (pre-fix \u2014 partial Mounts struct)\n\nMounts []struct {\n Type string // only this field was read\n}\n```\n\nBecause `VolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Options` is not declared in the partial struct, a mount of `Type: \"volume\"` passes the `Type != \"bind\"` check and is forwarded to the daemon. The local volume driver treats `{type: \"none\", o: \"bind\", device: \"\u003chost path\u003e\"}` as a bind-equivalent mount, so the check is bypassed.\n\nThe fix extends the partial struct to carry `VolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Options map[string]string`, rejects service create/update requests where that map declares a bind-style driver, and adds a new `CheckVolumeBodyRestrictions` invocation on `POST /volumes/create` (which previously had no `AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers` check on any branch).\n\n## Impact\n\nAn authenticated, non-admin Portainer user with access to any Docker Swarm-enabled endpoint can configure a service with:\n\n- **Elevated Linux capabilities** including `CAP_SYS_ADMIN`, `CAP_NET_ADMIN`, `CAP_SYS_PTRACE`, or `ALL` \u2014 not restricted by `AllowContainerCapabilitiesForRegularUsers`.\n- **Disabled syscall filtering** via `Privileges.Seccomp.Mode: \"unconfined\"` \u2014 not restricted by `AllowSecurityOptForRegularUsers`.\n- **Disabled AppArmor confinement** via `Privileges.AppArmor.Mode: \"disabled\"` \u2014 not restricted by `AllowSecurityOptForRegularUsers`.\n- **Arbitrary sysctl values** inside the container namespace \u2014 not restricted by `AllowSysctlSettingForRegularUsers`.\n- **Bind mounts of any host path**, including `/`, `/var/run/docker.sock`, SSH keys, or Portainer\u0027s own database \u2014 not restricted by `AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers`.\n- **Bind-mount-equivalent host filesystem access via volume driver options** \u2014 a `Type: \"volume\"` mount whose `VolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Options` describe a local-driver bind, or a direct `POST /volumes/create` with the same payload, yields the same capability as a direct bind and is not restricted by `AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers`.\n\nIn combination (e.g. `CapabilityAdd:[\"ALL\"]` + bind mount of `/`), this gives a user access equivalent to root on the Swarm manager host from a restricted account, overriding the administrator\u0027s security policy.\n\n## Timeline\n\n- `2026-03-12` \u2014 route2shell privately discloses the volume-driver local-bind variant.\n- `2026-04-05` \u2014 JohannesLks disclosure of the Swarm service create/update bypass\n- `2026-04-18` \u2014 Fix merged to develop.\n- `2026-04-29` \u2014 2.41.0 released.\n- `2026-05-07` \u2014 2.39.2-LTS and 2.33.8-LTS released.\n## Credit\n\n- **route2shell** \u2014 disclosure of the volume-driver local-bind variant on both Swarm service creation/update and the standalone `/volumes/create` endpoint.\n- **JohannesLks** \u2014 independent disclosure of the Swarm service create/update bypass",
"id": "GHSA-5fxq-qcf3-244w",
"modified": "2026-06-09T10:25:03Z",
"published": "2026-05-14T16:33:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/portainer/portainer/security/advisories/GHSA-5fxq-qcf3-244w"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44849"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/portainer/portainer"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/portainer/portainer/releases/tag/2.33.8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/portainer/portainer/releases/tag/2.39.2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/portainer/portainer/releases/tag/2.41.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Portainer has an endpoint security bypass via Swarm service create/update"
}
GHSA-5G3G-9C8X-WH8J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-30 15:31 – Updated: 2025-01-30 15:31The zStore Manager Basic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the zstore_clear_cache() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.311. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to clear the plugin's cache.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-13715"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-30T14:15:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The zStore Manager Basic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the zstore_clear_cache() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.311. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to clear the plugin\u0027s cache.",
"id": "GHSA-5g3g-9c8x-wh8j",
"modified": "2025-01-30T15:31:39Z",
"published": "2025-01-30T15:31:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13715"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/zstore-manager-basic/trunk/zstore-manager.php#L441"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/974ffc87-369a-431e-b601-8c6679d963c3?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5G4H-3XJ2-7JR8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-14 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThemeLocation Custom WooCommerce Checkout Fields Editor.This issue affects Custom WooCommerce Checkout Fields Editor: from n/a through 1.3.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-33956"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-14T15:38:23Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThemeLocation Custom WooCommerce Checkout Fields Editor.This issue affects Custom WooCommerce Checkout Fields Editor: from n/a through 1.3.0.",
"id": "GHSA-5g4h-3xj2-7jr8",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:08Z",
"published": "2024-05-14T18:30:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-33956"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/add-fields-to-checkout-page-woocommerce/wordpress-custom-woocommerce-checkout-fields-editor-plugin-1-3-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5G4Q-5R23-WRRP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-13 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in Webcodin WCP Contact Form allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WCP Contact Form: from n/a through 3.1.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-32520"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-13T15:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Webcodin WCP Contact Form allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WCP Contact Form: from n/a through 3.1.0.",
"id": "GHSA-5g4q-5r23-wrrp",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:23Z",
"published": "2024-12-13T15:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32520"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wcp-contact-form/vulnerability/wordpress-wcp-contact-form-plugin-3-1-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability-2?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5G72-9H25-J64H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-12 06:30 – Updated: 2026-02-12 06:30The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the load_step() function in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view booking information including customer names, email addresses, phone numbers, appointment times, and service details.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-1537"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-12T04:15:47Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The LatePoint \u2013 Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the load_step() function in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view booking information including customer names, email addresses, phone numbers, appointment times, and service details.",
"id": "GHSA-5g72-9h25-j64h",
"modified": "2026-02-12T06:30:13Z",
"published": "2026-02-12T06:30:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1537"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/latepoint/tags/5.2.5/lib/helpers/steps_helper.php#L231"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/latepoint/tags/5.2.5/lib/models/model.php#L562"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c18ad885-52a8-467b-83f2-aeb0c8be8be0?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5G73-69P4-7GVX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-22 03:30 – Updated: 2024-01-29 21:53GenerateSDFPipeline in synthetic_dataframe in PandasAI (aka pandas-ai) through 1.5.17 allows attackers to trigger the generation of arbitrary Python code that is executed by SDFCodeExecutor. An attacker can create a dataframe that provides an English language specification of this Python code. NOTE: the vendor previously attempted to restrict code execution in response to a separate issue, CVE-2023-39660.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "pandasai"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.5.17"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-23752"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-01-22T21:28:23Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-22T01:15:08Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "GenerateSDFPipeline in synthetic_dataframe in PandasAI (aka pandas-ai) through 1.5.17 allows attackers to trigger the generation of arbitrary Python code that is executed by SDFCodeExecutor. An attacker can create a dataframe that provides an English language specification of this Python code. NOTE: the vendor previously attempted to restrict code execution in response to a separate issue, CVE-2023-39660.",
"id": "GHSA-5g73-69p4-7gvx",
"modified": "2024-01-29T21:53:03Z",
"published": "2024-01-22T03:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23752"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gventuri/pandas-ai/issues/868"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/gventuri/pandas-ai"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Code execution in pandasai"
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.