Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-862

Allowed-with-Review

Missing Authorization

Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

14806 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-RGGM-WJVH-78R5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-08 00:00 – Updated: 2022-02-12 00:01
VLAI
Details

The Advanced Cron Manager WordPress plugin before 2.4.2, advanced-cron-manager-pro WordPress plugin before 2.5.3 does not have authorisation checks in some of its AJAX actions, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call them and add or remove events as well as schedules for example

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-25084"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-07T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Advanced Cron Manager WordPress plugin before 2.4.2, advanced-cron-manager-pro WordPress plugin before 2.5.3 does not have authorisation checks in some of its AJAX actions, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call them and add or remove events as well as schedules for example",
  "id": "GHSA-rggm-wjvh-78r5",
  "modified": "2022-02-12T00:01:07Z",
  "published": "2022-02-08T00:00:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-25084"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7c5c602f-499f-431b-80bc-507053984a06"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-RGJ7-VG8V-J4WR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-07 21:21 – Updated: 2026-05-07 21:21
VLAI
Summary
Ech0's Unauthenticated Like Endpoint Enables Arbitrary Engagement Metric Inflation
Details

Summary

No authentication is required to invoke PUT /api/echo/like/:id. The handler is registered on the public router group. The service increments fav_count for the given echo without checking identity, without a per-user limit, and without CSRF tokens. A remote client can arbitrarily inflate like metrics with repeated requests.

Description

Root cause: The like endpoint is explicitly public (PublicRouterGroup). LikeEcho in the service layer only runs a repository increment inside a transaction—no viewer/user binding.

Security boundary that fails: Integrity of engagement metrics (likes) and any trust that “likes” represent distinct or authenticated users.

Exploitation: Discover or guess a public echo UUID (timeline, API, share link) → send unauthenticated PUT repeatedly → fav_count increases linearly.

Affected files

| Public route registration | internal/router/echo.go | | Like mutation (no auth check) | internal/service/echo/echo.go | | Handler | internal/handler/echo/echo.go |

Vulnerable / relevant code

Public PUT route:

```11:13:Ech0/internal/router/echo.go // Public appRouterGroup.PublicRouterGroup.PUT("/echo/like/:id", h.EchoHandler.LikeEcho()) appRouterGroup.PublicRouterGroup.GET("/tags", h.EchoHandler.GetAllTags())


**Service does not use viewer / rate limit:**

```244:248:Ech0/internal/service/echo/echo.go
func (echoService *EchoService) LikeEcho(ctx context.Context, id string) error {
    return echoService.transactor.Run(ctx, func(txCtx context.Context) error {
        return echoService.echoRepository.LikeEcho(txCtx, id)
    })
}

Execution flow

  1. Client resolves ECHO_ID (e.g. GET /api/echo/page with any valid token, or from UI).
  2. Client sends PUT /api/echo/like/{ECHO_ID} with no Authorization header.
  3. Gin matches public route → handler → EchoService.LikeEcho → DB increments fav_count.
  4. Repeat N times → count increases by N.

Proof of concept

BASE="http://127.0.0.1:6277"

OWNER_TOKEN=$(curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/login" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"username":"owner","password":"OwnerPass123"}' | jq -r '.data')

ECHO_ID=$(curl -sS "$BASE/api/echo/page?page=1&page_size=1" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $OWNER_TOKEN" | jq -r '.data.items[0].id')

# Single unauthenticated like
curl -sS -w "\nHTTP:%{http_code}\n" -X PUT "$BASE/api/echo/like/$ECHO_ID"

# Inflate (e.g. 55 times); expect HTTP 200 each time
for i in $(seq 1 55); do
  curl -sS -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" -X PUT "$BASE/api/echo/like/$ECHO_ID"
done

# Observe fav_count
curl -sS "$BASE/api/echo/$ECHO_ID" | jq '.data | {id, fav_count}'

Observed proof (manual test):

  • Each unauthenticated PUT returned HTTP 200 with success JSON (e.g. 点赞Echo成功, code:1).
  • fav_count increased to 113 , demonstrating linear inflation from one client with no authentication. Screenshot 2026-04-01 105522

Impact

Like counts and ranking/social proof can be falsified; feeds or “popular” logic tied to fav_count are untrustworthy. high-volume loops add DB write load; possible abuse against availability at scale.

Attacker capability: Anyone on the network can manipulate public engagement metrics for any known echo id. Combined with permissive CORS browsers could automate cross-origin requests.

Remediation

Require authentication for likes and enforce one like per principal, or keep anonymous likes but add rate limiting, proof-of-work / captcha, or signed tokens tied to anon sessions; document that counts are not auditor-grade metrics.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/lin-snow/ech0"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.4.8-0.20260503040728-a7e8b8e84bd1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-07T21:21:21Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n**No authentication** is required to invoke **`PUT /api/echo/like/:id`**. The handler is registered on the **public** router group. The service increments **`fav_count`** for the given echo **without** checking identity, **without** a per-user limit, and **without** CSRF tokens. A remote client can **arbitrarily inflate** like metrics with repeated requests.\n\n### Description\n\n**Root cause:** The like endpoint is explicitly public (`PublicRouterGroup`). `LikeEcho` in the service layer only runs a repository increment inside a transaction\u2014no viewer/user binding.\n\n**Security boundary that fails:** **Integrity** of engagement metrics (likes) and any trust that \u201clikes\u201d represent distinct or authenticated users.\n\n**Exploitation:** Discover or guess a public echo UUID (timeline, API, share link) \u2192 send **unauthenticated** `PUT` repeatedly \u2192 **`fav_count`** increases linearly.\n\n### Affected files\n\n| Public route registration | `internal/router/echo.go` |\n| Like mutation (no auth check) | `internal/service/echo/echo.go` |\n| Handler | `internal/handler/echo/echo.go` |\n\n### Vulnerable / relevant code\n\n**Public PUT route:**\n\n```11:13:Ech0/internal/router/echo.go\n\t// Public\n\tappRouterGroup.PublicRouterGroup.PUT(\"/echo/like/:id\", h.EchoHandler.LikeEcho())\n\tappRouterGroup.PublicRouterGroup.GET(\"/tags\", h.EchoHandler.GetAllTags())\n```\n\n**Service does not use viewer / rate limit:**\n\n```244:248:Ech0/internal/service/echo/echo.go\nfunc (echoService *EchoService) LikeEcho(ctx context.Context, id string) error {\n\treturn echoService.transactor.Run(ctx, func(txCtx context.Context) error {\n\t\treturn echoService.echoRepository.LikeEcho(txCtx, id)\n\t})\n}\n```\n\n### Execution flow\n\n1. Client resolves `ECHO_ID` (e.g. `GET /api/echo/page` with any valid token, or from UI).\n2. Client sends **`PUT /api/echo/like/{ECHO_ID}`** with **no** `Authorization` header.\n3. Gin matches **public** route \u2192 handler \u2192 `EchoService.LikeEcho` \u2192 DB increments **`fav_count`**.\n4. Repeat N times \u2192 count increases by N.\n\n### Proof of concept\n\n```bash\nBASE=\"http://127.0.0.1:6277\"\n\nOWNER_TOKEN=$(curl -sS -X POST \"$BASE/api/login\" \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\"username\":\"owner\",\"password\":\"OwnerPass123\"}\u0027 | jq -r \u0027.data\u0027)\n\nECHO_ID=$(curl -sS \"$BASE/api/echo/page?page=1\u0026page_size=1\" \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Bearer $OWNER_TOKEN\" | jq -r \u0027.data.items[0].id\u0027)\n\n# Single unauthenticated like\ncurl -sS -w \"\\nHTTP:%{http_code}\\n\" -X PUT \"$BASE/api/echo/like/$ECHO_ID\"\n\n# Inflate (e.g. 55 times); expect HTTP 200 each time\nfor i in $(seq 1 55); do\n  curl -sS -o /dev/null -w \"%{http_code}\\n\" -X PUT \"$BASE/api/echo/like/$ECHO_ID\"\ndone\n\n# Observe fav_count\ncurl -sS \"$BASE/api/echo/$ECHO_ID\" | jq \u0027.data | {id, fav_count}\u0027\n```\n\n**Observed proof (manual test):**\n\n- Each unauthenticated `PUT` returned **HTTP `200`** with success JSON (e.g. `\u70b9\u8d5eEcho\u6210\u529f`, `code:1`).\n- **`fav_count`** increased to **113** , demonstrating **linear inflation from one client** with **no authentication**.\n\u003cimg width=\"1109\" height=\"188\" alt=\"Screenshot 2026-04-01 105522\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a725cf10-d20b-45a1-95bb-2e8ea396c08c\" /\u003e\n\n\n### Impact\n\n**Like counts and ranking/social proof** can be falsified; feeds or \u201cpopular\u201d logic tied to `fav_count` are untrustworthy. \nhigh-volume loops add DB write load; possible abuse against availability at scale. \n\n**Attacker capability:** Anyone on the network can manipulate **public** engagement metrics for any known echo id. Combined with permissive **CORS** browsers could automate cross-origin requests.\n\n## Remediation \n Require authentication for likes and enforce **one like per principal**, **or** keep anonymous likes but add **rate limiting**, **proof-of-work / captcha**, or **signed tokens** tied to anon sessions; document that counts are **not** auditor-grade metrics.",
  "id": "GHSA-rgj7-vg8v-j4wr",
  "modified": "2026-05-07T21:21:21Z",
  "published": "2026-05-07T21:21:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lin-snow/Ech0/security/advisories/GHSA-rgj7-vg8v-j4wr"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lin-snow/Ech0/commit/a7e8b8e84bd1e3db090dfb720f2c6c433356b442"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/lin-snow/Ech0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Ech0\u0027s Unauthenticated Like Endpoint Enables Arbitrary Engagement Metric Inflation"
}

GHSA-RGQ3-Q5RC-MJC3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-18 06:30 – Updated: 2026-02-18 06:30
VLAI
Details

The PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.0 via the wpo_ips_edi_save_order_customer_peppol_identifiers AJAX action due to missing capability checks and order ownership validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify Peppol/EDI endpoint identifiers (peppol_endpoint_id, peppol_endpoint_eas) for any customer by specifying an arbitrary order_id parameter on systems using Peppol invoicing. This can affect order routing on the Peppol network and may result in payment disruptions and data leakage.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-1906"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-18T06:16:34Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The PDF Invoices \u0026 Packing Slips for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.0 via the `wpo_ips_edi_save_order_customer_peppol_identifiers` AJAX action due to missing capability checks and order ownership validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify Peppol/EDI endpoint identifiers (`peppol_endpoint_id`, `peppol_endpoint_eas`) for any customer by specifying an arbitrary `order_id` parameter on systems using Peppol invoicing. This can affect order routing on the Peppol network and may result in payment disruptions and data leakage.",
  "id": "GHSA-rgq3-q5rc-mjc3",
  "modified": "2026-02-18T06:30:19Z",
  "published": "2026-02-18T06:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1906"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/woocommerce-pdf-invoices-packing-slips/tags/5.6.0/includes/Admin.php#L72"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/woocommerce-pdf-invoices-packing-slips/tags/5.6.0/includes/Admin.php#L895"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/woocommerce-pdf-invoices-packing-slips/#developers"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2e1922c6-e63b-47aa-97de-1e2382fa25d3?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-RGQF-3H7J-XMQ2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-05 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in VillaTheme HAPPY allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects HAPPY: from n/a through 1.0.6.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-53571"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-05T17:15:38Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in VillaTheme HAPPY allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects HAPPY: from n/a through 1.0.6.",
  "id": "GHSA-rgqf-3h7j-xmq2",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:07Z",
  "published": "2025-09-05T18:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-53571"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/happy-helpdesk-support-ticket-system/vulnerability/wordpress-happy-plugin-1-0-6-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-RGQG-HGW2-9CWW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-09 18:30 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:32
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in PenciDesign PenNews pennews allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects PenNews: from n/a through < 6.7.4.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-67572"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-09T16:18:34Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in PenciDesign PenNews pennews allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects PenNews: from n/a through \u003c 6.7.4.",
  "id": "GHSA-rgqg-hgw2-9cww",
  "modified": "2026-01-20T15:32:12Z",
  "published": "2025-12-09T18:30:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-67572"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/pennews/vulnerability/wordpress-pennews-theme-6-7-4-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/pennews/vulnerability/wordpress-pennews-theme-6-7-4-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-RH29-F327-4HGQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-07 12:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in DeannaS Embed RSS allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Embed RSS: from n/a through 3.1.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-25081"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-07T10:15:13Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in DeannaS Embed RSS allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Embed RSS: from n/a through 3.1.",
  "id": "GHSA-rh29-f327-4hgq",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:34Z",
  "published": "2025-02-07T12:31:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25081"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/embed-rss/vulnerability/wordpress-embed-rss-plugin-3-1-arbitrary-shortcode-execution-vulnerability-2?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-RH3P-JX4J-WJ9V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-02 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:33
VLAI
Details

The MailerLite – Signup forms (official) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized plugin setting changes due to a missing capability check on the toggleRolesAndPermissions and editAllowedRolesAndPermissions functions in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to allow lower level users to modify forms.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-2797"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-02T17:15:19Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The MailerLite \u2013 Signup forms (official) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized plugin setting changes due to a missing capability check on the toggleRolesAndPermissions and editAllowedRolesAndPermissions functions in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to allow lower level users to modify forms.",
  "id": "GHSA-rh3p-jx4j-wj9v",
  "modified": "2026-04-08T18:33:04Z",
  "published": "2024-05-02T18:30:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-2797"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/official-mailerlite-sign-up-forms/trunk/src/Admin/Actions.php#L41"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3070584/official-mailerlite-sign-up-forms/trunk?contextall=1\u0026old=3045803\u0026old_path=%2Fofficial-mailerlite-sign-up-forms%2Ftrunk"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/a03b4c19-85fa-47ad-b9ae-b466f8e5ca96?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-RH44-7W5Q-MCQG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-15 12:01 – Updated: 2022-10-18 12:00
VLAI
Details

In Music service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service in Music service with no additional execution privileges needed.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-39112"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-10-14T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In Music service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service in Music service with no additional execution privileges needed.",
  "id": "GHSA-rh44-7w5q-mcqg",
  "modified": "2022-10-18T12:00:32Z",
  "published": "2022-10-15T12:01:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39112"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.unisoc.com/en_us/secy/announcementDetail/1575654905820020738"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-RH69-24X3-3WF7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-01 15:31 – Updated: 2024-11-01 15:31
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Tyche Softwares Arconix FAQ allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Arconix FAQ: from n/a through 1.9.4.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-38783"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-01T15:15:35Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Tyche Softwares Arconix FAQ allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Arconix FAQ: from n/a through 1.9.4.",
  "id": "GHSA-rh69-24x3-3wf7",
  "modified": "2024-11-01T15:31:58Z",
  "published": "2024-11-01T15:31:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38783"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/arconix-faq/wordpress-arconix-faq-plugin-1-9-4-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-RH97-2GQ2-WWV2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 21:30 – Updated: 2026-06-15 21:30
VLAI
Details

Subscriber Broken Access Control in Classified Listing <= 5.3.9 versions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-42651"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-15T21:16:54Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Subscriber Broken Access Control in Classified Listing \u003c= 5.3.9 versions.",
  "id": "GHSA-rh97-2gq2-wwv2",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T21:30:47Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T21:30:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42651"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/classified-listing/vulnerability/wordpress-classified-listing-plugin-5-3-9-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].

Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration Installation

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws

An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.