Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-284

Discouraged

Improper Access Control

Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

8563 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-HP82-6QCX-X2XC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 00:34 – Updated: 2026-07-01 03:35
VLAI
Details

Inappropriate implementation in Passwords in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a local attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-13914"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-30T23:17:05Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Inappropriate implementation in Passwords in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a local attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: Medium)",
  "id": "GHSA-hp82-6qcx-x2xc",
  "modified": "2026-07-01T03:35:22Z",
  "published": "2026-07-01T00:34:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-13914"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0175352312.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/508273690"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HP9X-R9F2-X599

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-01 18:30 – Updated: 2025-07-01 21:32
VLAI
Details

Incorrect access control in Ullu (Android version v2.9.929 and IOS version v2.8.0) allows attackers to bypass parental pin feature via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-45083"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-01T18:15:25Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Incorrect access control in Ullu (Android version v2.9.929 and IOS version v2.8.0) allows attackers to bypass parental pin feature via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-hp9x-r9f2-x599",
  "modified": "2025-07-01T21:32:25Z",
  "published": "2025-07-01T18:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-45083"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pastebin.com/mFM1a3CP"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HPHC-R6JH-RC5X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:46 – Updated: 2024-04-04 00:43
VLAI
Details

Open-Xchange GmbH OX App Suite 7.8.3 and earlier is affected by: Incorrect Access Control.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-6912"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-05-22T20:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Open-Xchange GmbH OX App Suite 7.8.3 and earlier is affected by: Incorrect Access Control.",
  "id": "GHSA-hphc-r6jh-rc5x",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T00:43:05Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:46:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6912"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://documentation.open-xchange.com/7.10.0/release-notes/release-notes.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://open-xchange.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://ox.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HPMV-CMMM-3MQX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-02 21:32 – Updated: 2026-04-02 21:32
VLAI
Details

The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.1. A malicious application may be able to modify protected parts of the file system.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-44303"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-02T19:18:38Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.1. A malicious application may be able to modify protected parts of the file system.",
  "id": "GHSA-hpmv-cmmm-3mqx",
  "modified": "2026-04-02T21:32:52Z",
  "published": "2026-04-02T21:32:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44303"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/121564"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HPQM-FQWV-8FFG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:42 – Updated: 2022-09-21 00:00
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) for Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches in Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) mode could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to disable switching on a small form-factor pluggable (SFP) interface. This vulnerability is due to incomplete validation of the source of a received LLDP packet. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted LLDP packet on an SFP interface to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to disable switching on the SFP interface, which could disrupt network traffic.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-1231"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-346"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-02-24T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) for Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches in Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) mode could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to disable switching on a small form-factor pluggable (SFP) interface. This vulnerability is due to incomplete validation of the source of a received LLDP packet. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted LLDP packet on an SFP interface to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to disable switching on the SFP interface, which could disrupt network traffic.",
  "id": "GHSA-hpqm-fqwv-8ffg",
  "modified": "2022-09-21T00:00:42Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:42:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1231"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-apic-lldap-dos-WerV9CFj"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HPXW-6636-5H87

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-07 09:30 – Updated: 2023-04-13 18:30
VLAI
Details

Dell Power Manager, versions 3.10 and prior, contains an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low-privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to elevate privileges on the system.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-28051"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-04-07T08:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Dell Power Manager, versions 3.10 and prior, contains an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low-privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to elevate privileges on the system.",
  "id": "GHSA-hpxw-6636-5h87",
  "modified": "2023-04-13T18:30:28Z",
  "published": "2023-04-07T09:30:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28051"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000211891/dsa-2023-221-dell-power-manager"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQ33-8JGP-8QQ3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-28 22:03 – Updated: 2026-07-28 22:03
VLAI
Summary
goshs --no-delete WebDAV MOVE bypass allows file deletion/overwrite
Details

Summary

The WebDAV mode-flag guard added to fix GHSA-3whc-qvhv-xqjp still does not enforce --no-delete on the WebDAV MOVE verb. MOVE deletes the source file (rename removes it from its original path), and with Overwrite: T it additionally performs an explicit RemoveAll on the destination. Under -w --no-delete, DELETE is correctly blocked (403) but MOVE still destroys existing files, defeating the documented "Disable the delete option" boundary.

This is a residual of the parent fix: the guard classifies MOVE/COPY as write-only verbs (blocked only under --read-only) and never treats MOVE as a delete, so the --no-delete branch never covers it.

Affected

goshs v2.1.3 (current release, commit ba00ce3). The guard was introduced when GHSA-3whc-qvhv-xqjp was fixed and carries the gap forward.

Details

httpserver/server.go, wdGuard (lines 237-254):

wdGuard := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    switch r.Method {
    case http.MethodPut, "MKCOL", "MOVE", "COPY":
        if fs.ReadOnly {
            http.Error(w, "read-only", http.StatusForbidden)
            return
        }
    case http.MethodDelete:
        if fs.ReadOnly || fs.UploadOnly || fs.NoDelete {
            http.Error(w, "delete disabled", http.StatusForbidden)
            return
        }
    case http.MethodGet, http.MethodHead:
        if fs.UploadOnly {
            http.Error(w, "upload-only", http.StatusForbidden)
            return
        }
    }
    ...

MOVE lives in the first case and is gated only by fs.ReadOnly. It is never checked against fs.NoDelete. But MOVE in golang.org/x/net/webdav (file.go, moveFiles) calls fs.Rename(ctx, src, dst), which removes the source from its original location, and when the Overwrite: T header is present it first calls fs.RemoveAll(ctx, dst) on an existing destination. Both are deletions. So --no-delete, whose help text reads "Disable the delete option", does not disable deletion via MOVE.

The .goshs ACL layer (webdav_acl.go) checks auth and block-lists only; it does not enforce the mode flags, so it does not close this gap.

Proof of concept

Reproduced live against goshs v2.1.3 on 2026-07-02. Server started with --no-delete and WebDAV enabled:

$ printf 'TOP-SECRET-CONTENTS\n' > webroot/secret.txt
$ printf 'VICTIM-EXISTING-FILE\n'  > webroot/victim.txt
$ goshs -d webroot -i 127.0.0.1 -p 18080 --webdav --webdav-port 18081 --no-delete
INFO  Serving WEBDAV on 127.0.0.1:18081 from webroot

Control - DELETE is correctly blocked:

$ curl -s -i -X DELETE http://127.0.0.1:18081/secret.txt
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Server: goshs/v2.1.3 (darwin; go1.26.1)

secret.txt still exists on disk.

Bypass 1 - MOVE removes the source file despite --no-delete:

$ curl -s -i -X MOVE -H 'Destination: http://127.0.0.1:18081/gone.txt' http://127.0.0.1:18081/secret.txt
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Server: goshs/v2.1.3 (darwin; go1.26.1)

secret.txt is now deleted from disk (its content is at gone.txt).

Bypass 2 - MOVE with Overwrite:T destroys an existing victim file:

# before: victim.txt = VICTIM-EXISTING-FILE
$ curl -s -i -X MOVE -H 'Destination: http://127.0.0.1:18081/victim.txt' -H 'Overwrite: T' http://127.0.0.1:18081/gone.txt
HTTP/1.1 204 No Content
Server: goshs/v2.1.3 (darwin; go1.26.1)
# after:  victim.txt = TOP-SECRET-CONTENTS   (original VICTIM-EXISTING-FILE destroyed via RemoveAll)

Impact

An operator running goshs -w --no-delete -d /srv/artifacts to deliver files that must not be removed still allows any WebDAV client to delete or clobber existing files via MOVE. Confidential existing files can be renamed away or overwritten. The --no-delete control is silently ineffective on the WebDAV port for the MOVE verb.

Suggested fix

Move MOVE (and COPY on collision-with-overwrite, which also deletes) into the delete-gated branch, or add fs.NoDelete to the write-verb branch for MOVE:

case http.MethodPut, "MKCOL", "COPY":
    if fs.ReadOnly {
        http.Error(w, "read-only", http.StatusForbidden)
        return
    }
case "MOVE":
    // MOVE renames (deletes source) and, with Overwrite:T, RemoveAll(dst).
    if fs.ReadOnly || fs.UploadOnly || fs.NoDelete {
        http.Error(w, "move disabled", http.StatusForbidden)
        return
    }
case http.MethodDelete:
    if fs.ReadOnly || fs.UploadOnly || fs.NoDelete {
        http.Error(w, "delete disabled", http.StatusForbidden)
        return
    }

Add an integration test covering MOVE under --no-delete (the current testWebdavMoveCopy only exercises MOVE/COPY in unrestricted mode).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.1.3"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "goshs.de/goshs/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.1.3"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/patrickhener/goshs/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "goshs.de/goshs"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.1.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/patrickhener/goshs"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.1.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64863"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-28T22:03:12Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nThe WebDAV mode-flag guard added to fix GHSA-3whc-qvhv-xqjp still does not enforce `--no-delete` on the WebDAV `MOVE` verb. `MOVE` deletes the source file (rename removes it from its original path), and with `Overwrite: T` it additionally performs an explicit `RemoveAll` on the destination. Under `-w --no-delete`, `DELETE` is correctly blocked (403) but `MOVE` still destroys existing files, defeating the documented \"Disable the delete option\" boundary.\n\nThis is a residual of the parent fix: the guard classifies `MOVE`/`COPY` as write-only verbs (blocked only under `--read-only`) and never treats `MOVE` as a delete, so the `--no-delete` branch never covers it.\n\n## Affected\n\ngoshs v2.1.3 (current release, commit `ba00ce3`). The guard was introduced when GHSA-3whc-qvhv-xqjp was fixed and carries the gap forward.\n\n## Details\n\n`httpserver/server.go`, `wdGuard` (lines 237-254):\n\n```go\nwdGuard := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {\n    switch r.Method {\n    case http.MethodPut, \"MKCOL\", \"MOVE\", \"COPY\":\n        if fs.ReadOnly {\n            http.Error(w, \"read-only\", http.StatusForbidden)\n            return\n        }\n    case http.MethodDelete:\n        if fs.ReadOnly || fs.UploadOnly || fs.NoDelete {\n            http.Error(w, \"delete disabled\", http.StatusForbidden)\n            return\n        }\n    case http.MethodGet, http.MethodHead:\n        if fs.UploadOnly {\n            http.Error(w, \"upload-only\", http.StatusForbidden)\n            return\n        }\n    }\n    ...\n```\n\n`MOVE` lives in the first case and is gated only by `fs.ReadOnly`. It is never checked against `fs.NoDelete`. But `MOVE` in `golang.org/x/net/webdav` (`file.go`, `moveFiles`) calls `fs.Rename(ctx, src, dst)`, which removes the source from its original location, and when the `Overwrite: T` header is present it first calls `fs.RemoveAll(ctx, dst)` on an existing destination. Both are deletions. So `--no-delete`, whose help text reads \"Disable the delete option\", does not disable deletion via `MOVE`.\n\nThe `.goshs` ACL layer (`webdav_acl.go`) checks auth and block-lists only; it does not enforce the mode flags, so it does not close this gap.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\nReproduced live against goshs v2.1.3 on 2026-07-02. Server started with `--no-delete` and WebDAV enabled:\n\n```\n$ printf \u0027TOP-SECRET-CONTENTS\\n\u0027 \u003e webroot/secret.txt\n$ printf \u0027VICTIM-EXISTING-FILE\\n\u0027  \u003e webroot/victim.txt\n$ goshs -d webroot -i 127.0.0.1 -p 18080 --webdav --webdav-port 18081 --no-delete\nINFO  Serving WEBDAV on 127.0.0.1:18081 from webroot\n```\n\nControl - DELETE is correctly blocked:\n\n```\n$ curl -s -i -X DELETE http://127.0.0.1:18081/secret.txt\nHTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden\nContent-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\nServer: goshs/v2.1.3 (darwin; go1.26.1)\n```\n\nsecret.txt still exists on disk.\n\nBypass 1 - MOVE removes the source file despite --no-delete:\n\n```\n$ curl -s -i -X MOVE -H \u0027Destination: http://127.0.0.1:18081/gone.txt\u0027 http://127.0.0.1:18081/secret.txt\nHTTP/1.1 201 Created\nServer: goshs/v2.1.3 (darwin; go1.26.1)\n```\n\nsecret.txt is now deleted from disk (its content is at gone.txt).\n\nBypass 2 - MOVE with Overwrite:T destroys an existing victim file:\n\n```\n# before: victim.txt = VICTIM-EXISTING-FILE\n$ curl -s -i -X MOVE -H \u0027Destination: http://127.0.0.1:18081/victim.txt\u0027 -H \u0027Overwrite: T\u0027 http://127.0.0.1:18081/gone.txt\nHTTP/1.1 204 No Content\nServer: goshs/v2.1.3 (darwin; go1.26.1)\n# after:  victim.txt = TOP-SECRET-CONTENTS   (original VICTIM-EXISTING-FILE destroyed via RemoveAll)\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nAn operator running `goshs -w --no-delete -d /srv/artifacts` to deliver files that must not be removed still allows any WebDAV client to delete or clobber existing files via `MOVE`. Confidential existing files can be renamed away or overwritten. The `--no-delete` control is silently ineffective on the WebDAV port for the `MOVE` verb.\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nMove `MOVE` (and `COPY` on collision-with-overwrite, which also deletes) into the delete-gated branch, or add `fs.NoDelete` to the write-verb branch for `MOVE`:\n\n```go\ncase http.MethodPut, \"MKCOL\", \"COPY\":\n    if fs.ReadOnly {\n        http.Error(w, \"read-only\", http.StatusForbidden)\n        return\n    }\ncase \"MOVE\":\n    // MOVE renames (deletes source) and, with Overwrite:T, RemoveAll(dst).\n    if fs.ReadOnly || fs.UploadOnly || fs.NoDelete {\n        http.Error(w, \"move disabled\", http.StatusForbidden)\n        return\n    }\ncase http.MethodDelete:\n    if fs.ReadOnly || fs.UploadOnly || fs.NoDelete {\n        http.Error(w, \"delete disabled\", http.StatusForbidden)\n        return\n    }\n```\n\nAdd an integration test covering `MOVE` under `--no-delete` (the current `testWebdavMoveCopy` only exercises MOVE/COPY in unrestricted mode).",
  "id": "GHSA-hq33-8jgp-8qq3",
  "modified": "2026-07-28T22:03:12Z",
  "published": "2026-07-28T22:03:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/goshs-labs/goshs/security/advisories/GHSA-hq33-8jgp-8qq3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/goshs-labs/goshs/commit/0444ac6b1a8176ddae70d940adf7a26b2e5a6c29"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/goshs-labs/goshs"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/goshs-labs/goshs/releases/tag/v2.1.4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "goshs --no-delete WebDAV MOVE bypass allows file deletion/overwrite"
}

GHSA-HQ3P-78FH-V8QW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-14 21:31 – Updated: 2023-11-14 21:31
VLAI
Details

Improper access control for some Intel Unison software may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via network access.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-39228"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-11-14T19:15:29Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Improper access control for some Intel Unison software may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via network access.",
  "id": "GHSA-hq3p-78fh-v8qw",
  "modified": "2023-11-14T21:31:02Z",
  "published": "2023-11-14T21:31:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-39228"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00963.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQ52-6C88-JQQ6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-28 12:30 – Updated: 2025-09-28 12:30
VLAI
Details

A security vulnerability has been detected in Projectworlds Online Tours and Travels 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/change-image.php. The manipulation of the argument packageimage leads to unrestricted upload. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-11103"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-28T11:15:31Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A security vulnerability has been detected in Projectworlds Online Tours and Travels 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/change-image.php. The manipulation of the argument packageimage leads to unrestricted upload. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.",
  "id": "GHSA-hq52-6c88-jqq6",
  "modified": "2025-09-28T12:30:25Z",
  "published": "2025-09-28T12:30:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11103"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Landjun/CVE/issues/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.326184"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.326184"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.662395"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQC9-64CV-8VVF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-11 12:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:55
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CN 4100 (All versions < V2.5). Affected device consists of improper access controls in the configuration files that leads to privilege escalation. An attacker could gain admin access with this vulnerability leading to complete device control.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-29130"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-07-11T10:15:10Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CN 4100 (All versions \u003c V2.5). Affected device consists of improper access controls in the configuration files that leads to privilege escalation. An attacker could gain admin access with this vulnerability leading to complete device control.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqc9-64cv-8vvf",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T05:55:21Z",
  "published": "2023-07-11T12:30:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-29130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-313488.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-1
Architecture and Design Operation

Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.

Mitigation MIT-46
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Separation of Privilege

  • Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts

An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.

CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion

An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.

CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.

CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.

CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof

An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.

CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure

An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.

CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration

An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.

CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment

An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.

CAPEC-550: Install New Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.

CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.

CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit

An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.

CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers

When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.

CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable

An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.

CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File

An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.

CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot

An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.

CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon

Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.

CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.