usn-2469-1
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Jedediah Smith discovered that Django incorrectly handled underscores in WSGI headers. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to spoof headers in certain environments. (CVE-2015-0219)
Mikko Ohtamaa discovered that Django incorrectly handled user-supplied redirect URLs. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a cross-site scripting attack. (CVE-2015-0220)
Alex Gaynor discovered that Django incorrectly handled reading files in django.views.static.serve(). A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Django to consume resources, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2015-0221)
Keryn Knight discovered that Django incorrectly handled forms with ModelMultipleChoiceField. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a large number of SQL queries, resulting in a database denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.10. (CVE-2015-0222)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"cves_map": {
"cves": [
{
"id": "CVE-2015-0219",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2015-0220",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2015-0221",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2015-0222",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
}
],
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS"
}
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "python-django",
"binary_version": "1.6.1-2ubuntu0.6"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS",
"name": "python-django",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/python-django@1.6.1-2ubuntu0.6?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.6.1-2ubuntu0.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.5.4-1ubuntu1",
"1.6-1",
"1.6.1-1",
"1.6.1-2",
"1.6.1-2ubuntu0.1",
"1.6.1-2ubuntu0.2",
"1.6.1-2ubuntu0.3",
"1.6.1-2ubuntu0.4",
"1.6.1-2ubuntu0.5"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "Jedediah Smith discovered that Django incorrectly handled underscores in\nWSGI headers. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to spoof\nheaders in certain environments. (CVE-2015-0219)\n\nMikko Ohtamaa discovered that Django incorrectly handled user-supplied\nredirect URLs. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a\ncross-site scripting attack. (CVE-2015-0220)\n\nAlex Gaynor discovered that Django incorrectly handled reading files in\ndjango.views.static.serve(). A remote attacker could possibly use this\nissue to cause Django to consume resources, resulting in a denial of\nservice. (CVE-2015-0221)\n\nKeryn Knight discovered that Django incorrectly handled forms with\nModelMultipleChoiceField. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue\nto cause a large number of SQL queries, resulting in a database denial of\nservice. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.10.\n(CVE-2015-0222)\n",
"id": "USN-2469-1",
"modified": "2026-02-10T04:40:51Z",
"published": "2015-01-13T19:40:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-2469-1"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-0219"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-0220"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-0221"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2015-0222"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"summary": "python-django vulnerabilities",
"upstream": [
"UBUNTU-CVE-2015-0219",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2015-0220",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2015-0221",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2015-0222"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.