ubuntu-cve-2026-40290
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Starting in version 3.16.0 and prior to 4.11.0, a user-after-free (UAF) race condition exists in the shared memory teardown logic of FF-A within OP-TEE SPMC/SP flows. This only applies when OP-TEE is configured as an SPMC for S-EL0 SPs, that is, with CFG_SECURE_PARTITION=y. The function sp_mem_remove(), responsible for freeing entries in smem->receivers and smem->regions, fails to acquire the global sp_mem_lock before performing the free() operations. Concurrently, other code paths, such as sp_mem_get_receiver(), iterate over these same lists without holding a lock, or, like sp_mem_is_shared(), iterate while holding the lock but are not serialized against the unprotected free() in sp_mem_remove(). This creates a cross-thread race where a thread iterating the list can acquire a pointer to an entry (e.g., struct sp_mem_map_region or struct sp_mem_receiver), and then another thread calls sp_mem_remove(), freeing the object. When the first thread resumes and dereferences the pointer, it results in a Use-After-Free vulnerability. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "optee-os",
"binary_version": "4.7.0-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:25.10",
"name": "optee-os",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/optee-os@4.7.0-1?arch=source\u0026distro=questing"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"4.5.0-1",
"4.5.0-2",
"4.7.0-1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "optee-os",
"binary_version": "4.8.0-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:26.04:LTS",
"name": "optee-os",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/optee-os@4.8.0-1?arch=source\u0026distro=resolute"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"4.7.0-1",
"4.8.0-1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Starting in version 3.16.0 and prior to 4.11.0, a user-after-free (UAF) race condition exists in the shared memory teardown logic of FF-A within OP-TEE SPMC/SP flows. This only applies when OP-TEE is configured as an SPMC for S-EL0 SPs, that is, with `CFG_SECURE_PARTITION=y`. The function `sp_mem_remove()`, responsible for freeing entries in `smem-\u003ereceivers` and `smem-\u003eregions`, fails to acquire the global `sp_mem_lock` before performing the `free()` operations. Concurrently, other code paths, such as `sp_mem_get_receiver()`, iterate over these same lists without holding a lock, or, like `sp_mem_is_shared()`, iterate while holding the lock but are not serialized against the unprotected `free()` in `sp_mem_remove()`. This creates a cross-thread race where a thread iterating the list can acquire a pointer to an entry (e.g., `struct sp_mem_map_region` or `struct sp_mem_receiver`), and then another thread calls `sp_mem_remove()`, freeing the object. When the first thread resumes and dereferences the pointer, it results in a Use-After-Free vulnerability. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2026-40290",
"modified": "2026-06-11T13:04:28Z",
"published": "2026-06-03T18:16:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-40290"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40290"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/security/advisories/GHSA-332c-xr93-849m"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-40290"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.