ubuntu-cve-2026-33895
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, Ed25519 signature verification accepts forged non-canonical signatures where the scalar S is not reduced modulo the group order (S >= L). A valid signature and its S + L variant both verify in forge, while Node.js crypto.verify (OpenSSL-backed) rejects the S + L variant, as defined by the specification. This class of signature malleability has been exploited in practice to bypass authentication and authorization logic (see CVE-2026-25793, CVE-2022-35961). Applications relying on signature uniqueness (i.e., dedup by signature bytes, replay tracking, signed-object canonicalization checks) may be bypassed. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libjs-node-forge",
"binary_version": "0.9.1~dfsg-1"
},
{
"binary_name": "node-node-forge",
"binary_version": "0.9.1~dfsg-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:20.04:LTS",
"name": "node-node-forge",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/node-node-forge@0.9.1~dfsg-1?arch=source\u0026distro=focal"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.8.5~dfsg-2",
"0.9.1~dfsg-1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libjs-node-forge",
"binary_version": "1.2.1~dfsg-2"
},
{
"binary_name": "node-node-forge",
"binary_version": "1.2.1~dfsg-2"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:22.04:LTS",
"name": "node-node-forge",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/node-node-forge@1.2.1~dfsg-2?arch=source\u0026distro=jammy"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.10.0~dfsg-3",
"1.2.1~dfsg-2"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, Ed25519 signature verification accepts forged non-canonical signatures where the scalar S is not reduced modulo the group order (`S \u003e= L`). A valid signature and its `S + L` variant both verify in forge, while Node.js `crypto.verify` (OpenSSL-backed) rejects the `S + L` variant, as defined by the specification. This class of signature malleability has been exploited in practice to bypass authentication and authorization logic (see CVE-2026-25793, CVE-2022-35961). Applications relying on signature uniqueness (i.e., dedup by signature bytes, replay tracking, signed-object canonicalization checks) may be bypassed. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue.",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2026-33895",
"modified": "2026-06-30T16:20:55Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T21:17:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-33895"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33895"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032#section-8.4"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/bdecf11571c9f1a487cc0fe72fe78ff6dfa96b85"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-33895"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.