UBUNTU-CVE-2020-5249 (CVE-2020-5249)
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu – Published: 2020-03-02 16:15 – Updated: 2025-07-16 04:55 – Source websiteIn Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting. While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS). This is related to CVE-2020-5247, which fixed this vulnerability but only for regular responses. This has been fixed in 4.3.3 and 3.12.4.
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "puma",
"binary_version": "3.12.4-1ubuntu2"
},
{
"binary_name": "puma-dbgsym",
"binary_version": "3.12.4-1ubuntu2"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:20.04:LTS",
"name": "puma",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/puma@3.12.4-1ubuntu2?arch=source\u0026distro=focal"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.12.4-1ubuntu2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"3.12.0-2ubuntu1",
"3.12.0-4ubuntu1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting. While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS). This is related to CVE-2020-5247, which fixed this vulnerability but only for regular responses. This has been fixed in 4.3.3 and 3.12.4.",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2020-5249",
"modified": "2025-07-16T04:55:31Z",
"published": "2020-03-02T16:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2020-5249"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-33vf-4xgg-9r58"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/commit/c22712fc93284a45a93f9ad7023888f3a65524f3"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-84j7-475p-hp8v"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/HTTP_Response_Splitting"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-5249"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2020-5249"
],
"withdrawn": "2025-07-18T16:45:41Z"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.