UBUNTU-CVE-2019-18792 (CVE-2019-18792)

Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu – Published: 2020-01-06 18:15 – Updated: 2025-10-24 04:47 – Source website
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in Suricata 5.0.0. It is possible to bypass/evade any tcp based signature by overlapping a TCP segment with a fake FIN packet. The fake FIN packet is injected just before the PUSH ACK packet we want to bypass. The PUSH ACK packet (containing the data) will be ignored by Suricata because it overlaps the FIN packet (the sequence and ack number are identical in the two packets). The client will ignore the fake FIN packet because the ACK flag is not set. Both linux and windows clients are ignoring the injected packet.

Severity
9.1 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
N/A (UNKNOWN)
medium
References
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "suricata",
            "binary_version": "3.0-1"
          }
        ]
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Ubuntu:16.04:LTS",
        "name": "suricata",
        "purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/suricata@3.0-1?arch=source\u0026distro=xenial"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "2.0.8-1build1",
        "2.0.9-1",
        "2.0.10-1",
        "2.0.10-2",
        "2.0.11-1",
        "3.0-1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "libhtp-0.5.23-1",
            "binary_version": "3.2-2ubuntu3"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "suricata",
            "binary_version": "3.2-2ubuntu3"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "suricata-hyperscan",
            "binary_version": "3.2-2ubuntu3"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "suricata-oinkmaster",
            "binary_version": "3.2-2ubuntu3"
          }
        ]
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Ubuntu:18.04:LTS",
        "name": "suricata",
        "purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/suricata@3.2-2ubuntu3?arch=source\u0026distro=bionic"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "3.2-2ubuntu3"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Suricata 5.0.0. It is possible to bypass/evade any tcp based signature by overlapping a TCP segment with a fake FIN packet. The fake FIN packet is injected just before the PUSH ACK packet we want to bypass. The PUSH ACK packet (containing the data) will be ignored by Suricata because it overlaps the FIN packet (the sequence and ack number are identical in the two packets). The client will ignore the fake FIN packet because the ACK flag is not set. Both linux and windows clients are ignoring the injected packet.",
  "id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2019-18792",
  "modified": "2025-10-24T04:47:57Z",
  "published": "2020-01-06T18:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2019-18792"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/1c63d3905852f746ccde7e2585600b2199cefb4b"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/fa692df37a796c3330c81988d15ef1a219afc006"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/3324"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/3394"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/1c63d3905852f746ccde7e2585600b2199cefb4b"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/fa692df37a796c3330c81988d15ef1a219afc006"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18792"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "schema_version": "1.7.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "medium",
      "type": "Ubuntu"
    }
  ],
  "upstream": [
    "CVE-2019-18792"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.